Virtual Action Learning: A New Genre for Powerful Learning



Over the last four years the practice of Action Learning at Ashridge Consulting has gone through a considerable change, namely a significant amount of Action Learning sessions are now delivered virtually. Since 2005 we have worked with more than 12 global organisations and more than 1,200 participants. Action Learning has in itself a long, successful tradition. Originated by Professor Reginald Revans in the United Kingdom in the 1940s this learning format enables groups of up to six managers to present their respective ‘issues’ (an issue can be, for example, a strategic decision that one needs to take, a challenging operational problem, or an interpersonal difficulty with a colleague) and through a process of questioning and feedback by peers the ‘issue holder’ (the person presenting the issue) obtains useful challenge and support to develop a deeper understanding of the issue at hand, which often results in finding a different approach to address it. The process is usually facilitated by an experienced process consultant. In some cases Action Learning groups carry on for several years and self-facilitate.


Action Learn Virtual Space Learning Format Critical Success Factor Virtual Team 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. D. Casey, ‘Breaking the shell that encloses your understanding’, Journal of Management Development, Vol. 6, No. 2 (1987).Google Scholar
  2. G. Caulat, ‘Creating trust in intimacy in the virtual world’, Converse, Issue 4 (2006), 8–10.Google Scholar
  3. G. Caulat, and E. De Haan, ‘Virtual peer consultation: How virtual leaders learn’, Organization and People, November, Vol. 13, No. 4 (2006).Google Scholar
  4. M. Dickenson, M. Pedler and J. Burgoyne, ‘Virtual action learning – A new frontier?’, in S. Voller, E. Blass, and V. Culpin (eds), The Future of Learning: Innovations and Insights from Executive Education (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010).Google Scholar
  5. S.H. Foulkes, Group Analytic Psychotherapy, Method and Principles (London: Gordon & Breach, 1975).Google Scholar
  6. C. Gilligan, In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development (Cambridge Mass: Harvard University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
  7. W.B. Gudykunst and T. Nishida, ‘Individual and cultural influences on uncertainty reduction’, Communication Monographs, 51 (1984), 26–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. C. Handy, ‘Trust and the virtual organization’, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 73, No. 3 (1995), 40–50.Google Scholar
  9. J. Heron, The Complete Facilitator’s Handbook (London: Kogan Page, 1999).Google Scholar
  10. C. Hine, Virtual Ethnography (London: Sage Publications Ltd, 2000).Google Scholar
  11. B. Kirkman, B. Rosen, C. Gibson, P. Teshik and S. Mcpherson, ‘Five challenges to virtual team success: Lessons from Sabre, Inc.’, Academy of Management Executive, Vol. 16, No. 3 (2002), 67–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. J. Lipnack and J. Stamps, Virtual Teams: Reaching Across Space, Time, and Organizations with Technology (London: John Wiley & Sons, 1997).Google Scholar
  13. E. McFadzean and J. McKenzie, ‘Facilitating virtual learning groups: A practical approach’, Journal of Management Development, Vol. 20, No. 6 (2001).Google Scholar
  14. A. Mehrabian, Silent Messages: Implicit Communication of Emotions and Attitudes (Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 1971).Google Scholar
  15. H. Morschbach, ‘Aspects of nonverbal communication in Japan’, The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 157 (1973), 266–277.Google Scholar
  16. N. Panteli and S. Fineman, ‘The sound of silence: The case of virtual team organizing’, Behaviour & Information Technology, Vol. 24, No. 5 (2005), 347–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. N. Sano, S. Yamaguschi and D. Mutsumoto, ‘Is silence golden? A cross-cultural study on the meaning of silence’, Progress in Asian Social Psychology: Theoretical and Empirical Contributions, T. Sugiman, M. Karasawa, J. Liu and C. Ward (eds), 145–155 (New York: Wiley, 1999).Google Scholar
  18. J. Suler, CyberPsychology and Behavior, Vol. 7 (2004), 321–326. Available from: Google Scholar
  19. H. Weinberg, ‘Group analysis, large group and the internet unconscious’, PhD thesis (Manchester: Metropolitan University, 2006).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© the contributors 2011

Authors and Affiliations

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations