Skip to main content

The Weight of Argument

  • Chapter
Fundamental Uncertainty

Abstract

In Chapter 6 of A Treatise on Probability (1973 [1921], hereafter TP), John Maynard Keynes raised a question he described as “somewhat novel.” This concerned the problem he labeled “The weight of arguments.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Good, I. J. (1981), ‘An Error by Peirce Concerning Weight of Evidence,’ Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 13, pp. 155–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — (1983), Good Thinking: The Foundations of Probability and Its Applications, Minneapolis: Minnesota, University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keynes, J.M. (1973 [1921]), A Treatise on Probability, vol. VIII of The Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes, London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi, I. (1967), Gambling with Truth, New York: Knopf, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. Paperback edn 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1974), ‘On Indeterminate Probabilities’, Journal of Philosophy, 71 (July), pp. 391–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — (1980), The Enterprise of Knowledge, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. Paperback edn. 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1984), Decisions and Revisions, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • — (1996), For the Sake of the Argument, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • — (2001), ‘Inductive Expansion and Nonmonotonic Reasoning,’ in M. A. Williams and H. Rott (eds), Frontiers in Belief Revision, Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 7–56.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, C. S. (1867), ‘Review of 1866 Edition of The Logic of Chance by J. Venn,’ in E. C. Moore (ed.), Writings of Charles S. Peirce, 2 Bloomington, Ind., Indiana University Press (1984), pp. 98–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1878), ‘Probability of Induction,’ in C. J. W. Kloessel, (ed.), Writings of Charles S. Peirce, 3, Bloomington, Ind.: Indiana University Press (1986), pp. 290–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1883), ‘A Theory of Probable Inference’, in C. J. W. Kloessel, (ed.), Writings of Charles S. Peirce, 4, Bloomington, Ind.: Indiana University Press (1986), 408–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey, F. P. (1990a), Philosophical Papers, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1990b), ‘Weight or Value of Knowledge,’ British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 41, pp. 1–4, with a preamble by N.-E. Sahlin.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savage, L. J. (1954), The Foundations of Statistics, New York: Wiley; 2nd revised edn 1972, New York: Dover.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shackle, G. L. S. (1952), Expectation in Economics, 2nd edn (1st edn 1949), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1961), Decision, Order and Time, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skyrms, B. (1990), The Dynamics of Rational Deliberation, Cambridge. Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venn, J. (1888), The Logic of Chance, 4th edition.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2011 Isaac Levi

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Levi, I. (2011). The Weight of Argument. In: Brandolini, S.M.D., Scazzieri, R. (eds) Fundamental Uncertainty. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230305687_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics