Skip to main content

Part of the book series: The History of British Women’s Writing ((HBWW))

  • 178 Accesses

Abstract

Women’s writing during the period covered by this volume, 1610–1690, is marked by the great variety in kinds and genres, in manuscript and in print: from literary works such as poetry, drama, and fiction, to memoirs, letters, pamphlets, and broadsides. Their authors span the social spectrum from aristocratic women writing memoirs and letters to lower-rank women petitioning Parliament on behalf of their imprisoned husbands. The religious and political allegiances of these authors range from strict Anglicans and monarchists to dissenters and supporters of Parliament and even Catholics who were persecuted for their faith. Although the greatest number of publications appeared during the central years of the Civil War and Interregnum (1642–60), the decades before 1640 as well as the years following the Restoration of Charles II in 1660 also constitute significant periods for women’s writing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Susanne Woods, ed., The Poems of Aemilia Lanyer: Salve Deus Rex Judaeorum (New York: Oxford University Press, 1993). Barry Weller and Margaret W. Ferguson, eds, The Tragedy of Mariam with The Lady Falkland Her Life (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Excerpts from Swetnam’s text as well as from Sowernam, Munda, Hic Mulier, and Haec Vir are included in Katherine Usher Henderson and Barbara F. McManus, eds, Half Humankind: Contexts and Texts of the Controversy About Women in England, 1540–1640 (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1985). For Speght, see Barbara Kiefer Lewalski, ed., The Polemics and Poems of Rachel Speght (New York: Oxford University Press, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  3. D. J. H. Clifford, ed., The Diaries of Lady Anne Clifford (Stroud: Sutton, 1990). For the portion of the ‘Great Book’ not included in D. J. H. Clifford’s edition, see Hilda L. Smith, Mihoko Suzuki, and Susan Wiseman, eds, Women’s Political Writings, 1610–1725 (London: Pickering and Chatto, 2007), I: 5–107.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Josephine Roberts, ed., The First Part of the Countess of Montgomery’s Urania (Binghamton, NY: Center for Medieval and Early Renaissance Studies, 1995); Roberts, ed., completed by Suzanne Gossett and Janel Mueller, The Second Part of the Countess of Montgomery’s Urania (Tempe, AZ: Renaissance English Text Society, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  5. See Mihoko Suzuki, ‘Elizabeth, Gender and the Political Imaginary in Seventeenth-Century England’, in Debating Gender in Early Modern England, 1500–1700, ed. Cristina Malcolmson and Mihoko Suzuki (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2002), 231–53.

    Google Scholar 

  6. The texts by Leigh, Clinton, and Jocelin are included in Betty S. Travitsky, ed., Mother’s Advice Books (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Patricia Crawford, ‘Women’s Published Writings, 1600–1700’, in Women in English Society, 1500–1800, ed. Mary Prior (London: Methuen, 1985), 211–82.

    Google Scholar 

  8. See Mihoko Suzuki, Subordinate Subjects: Gender, the Political Nation, and Literary Form in England, 1588–1688 (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2003), 145–51.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Katharine Gillespie, ed., Katherine Chidley (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2009), xi.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Anna Weamys, The Continuation of Sir Philip Sidney’s Arcadia, ed. Patrick Cullen (New York: Oxford University Press, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  11. For excerpts from Cavendish’s works, see Sylvia Bowerbank and Sara Mendelson, eds, Paper Bodies: A Margaret Cavendish Reader (Peterborough, ON: Broadview, 2000). See also Anne Shaver, ed., The Convent of Pleasure and Other Plays (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  12. S. P. Cerasano and Marion Wynne-Davies, eds, Renaissance Drama by Women: Texts and Documents (New York and London: Routledge, 1996), 127–56.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Excerpts from Pulter’s poetry can be found in Jill Seal Millman and Gillian Wright, eds, Early Modern Women’s Manuscript Poetry (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2005), 111–27; and Jane Stevenson and Peter Davidson, eds, Early Modern Women Poets: An Anthology (New York: Oxford University Press, 2001), 187–95.

    Google Scholar 

  14. The Blazing World and selections from the Orations can be found in Susan James, ed., Margaret Cavendish Political Writings (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2003). See also Kate Lilly, ed., The Blazing World and Other Writings (London: Penguin, 1992) and James Fitzmaurice, ed., Sociable Letters (Peterborough, ON: Broadview, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  15. N. H. Keeble, ed., Memoirs of the Life of Colonel Hutchinson with a Fragment of Autobiography (London: J. M. Dent; Rutland, VT: Everyman, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  16. David Norbrook, ed., Order and Disorder (Oxford: Blackwell, 2000), includes both the published cantos and those that remained in manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hugh de Quehen, ed., Lucy Hutchinson’s Translation of Lucretius: De rerum natura (London: Duckworth; Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1996); David Norbrook, ‘Lucy Hutchinson’s Elegies and the Situation of the Republican Woman Writer (with text)’, English Literary Renaissance 27 (1997): 468–521.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Joseph R. McElrath, Jr. and Allan P. Robb, eds, The Complete Works of Anne Bradstreet (Boston: Twayne, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Patrick Thomas, ed., The Collected Works of Katherine Philips (Stump Cross: Stump Cross Books, 1993), vol. III.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mihoko Suzuki, ed., Mary Carleton (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mihoko Suzuki, ed., Elizabeth Cellier (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Margaret W. Ferguson, ed., Works by and attributed to Elizabeth Cary (Aldershot: Ashgate, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  23. For selections of Russell’s letters, 1671–91, see Women’s Political Writings, ed. Smith et al., III: 83–108. See also Lois G. Schwoerer, Lady Rachel Russell, ‘One of the Best of Women’ (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Paula McDowell, ed., Elinor James (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2005), 62–79.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Virginia Woolf, A Room of One’s Own (New York: Harcourt Brace, 1927), 47. Subsequent references are cited parenthetically in the text. A question similar to Woolf’s was asked by art historian Linda Nochlin in ‘Why Have There Been No Great Women Artists?’ Art News 69 (January 1971): 22–39, 67–71, reprinted in Women, Art, and Power and Other Essays (Boulder: Westview Press, 1988), 147–58. Challenging the notion of ‘genius’ and ‘greatness’ ascribed to male artists, Nochlin, like Woolf, called attention to the institutional obstacles women faced in entering the artistic profession.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Margaret J. M. Ezell, Writing Women’s Literary History (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1998), 18–23. Subsequent references are cited parenthetically in the text.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ibid., 68: ‘Between 1675 and 1875, there were at least twenty-five biographical encyclopedias and anthologies specifically devoted to chronicling the lives and labors of literary Englishwomen.’

    Google Scholar 

  28. George Ballard, Memoirs of Several ladies of Great Britain Who have been Celebrated for their Writings or Skill in the Learned Languages, Arts and Sciences, ed. Ruth Perry (Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Nicky Hallett, ‘Anne Clifford as Orlando: Virginia Woolf’s Feminist Historiology and Women’s Biography’, Women’s History Review 4 (1995): 505–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Hilda L. Smith, ‘Regionalism, Feminism, Class: The Development of a Feminist Historian’, in Voices of Women Historians: The Personal, the Political, and the Professional, ed. Eileen Boris and Nupur Chaudhuri (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1999), 30–42.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Sara Mendelson, The Mental World of Stuart Women: Three Studies (Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 1987), 61.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Elaine Hobby, Virtue of Necessity: English Women’s Writing, 1648–88 (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Hilda L. Smith and Susan Cardinale, eds, Women and the Literature of the Seventeenth Century: An Annotated Bibliography based on Wing’s Short-title Catalogue (New York: Greenwood, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Germaine Greer, Susan Hastings, Jeslyn Medoff, and Melissa Sansone, eds, Kissing the Rod: An Anthology of Seventeenth-Century Women’s Verse (New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux, 1988), 1. The landmark nature of this publication event can be gleaned from its commemoration by an international conference held at St. Hilda’s College, Oxford: Still Kissing the Rod?: Early Modern Women’s Writing, in 2005, and in the special issue of Women’s Writing (14.2 [2007]), Still Kissing the Rod?: Early Modern Women’s Writing, ed. Elizabeth Clarke and Lynn Robson.

    Google Scholar 

  35. The ‘Centuries’ of Julia Palmer, ed. Victoria Burke and Elizabeth Clarke (Nottingham: Trent Editions, 2001); The Southwell-Sibthorpe Commonplace Book: Folger Ms. V.B. 198, ed. Jean Klene (Tempe, AZ: Medieval and Renaissance Texts and Studies, 1997). On the importance of Pulter, see Nigel Smith, ‘The Rod and the Canon’, Women’s Writing 14.2 (2007): 232–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Elaine Beilin, Redeeming Eve: Women Writers of the English Renaissance (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1987). Beilin’s final chapter discusses defenses of women and mother’s advice books.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Barbara Lewalski, Writing Women in Jacobean England (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Wendy Wall, Imprint of Gender: Authorship and Publication in the English Renaissance (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1993), 289.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Greer, in Kissing the Rod, ed. Greer et al., 20; Diane Purkiss, ‘Material Girls: The Seventeenth-Century Woman Debate’, in Women, Texts and Histories, 1575–1760, ed. Clare Brant and Diane Purkiss (London: Routledge, 1992), 71.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Susan Wiseman, ‘Gender and Status in Dramatic Discourse: Margaret Cavendish, Duchess of Newcastle’, in Women, History, Writing, 1640–1740, ed. Isobel Grundy and Susan Wiseman (Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press, 1992), 177.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Lisa Schnell, ‘“So Great a Diffrence is There in Degree”: Aemilia Lanyer and the Aims of Feminist Criticism’, Modern Language Quarterly 57.1 (1996): 23–35; Lisa Schnell, ‘Breaking “the rule of Cortezia”: Aemilia Lanyer’s Dedications to Salve Deus Rex Judaeorum’, Journal of Medieval and Renaissance Studies 27.1 (1997): 77–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Hero Chalmers, Royalist Women Writers, 1650–1689 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2004). For discussion of Cavendish’s ‘ambiguous royalism’, see Suzuki, Subordinate Subjects, 182–202.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  43. See also Margo Hendricks, ‘Alliance and Exile: Aphra Behn’s Racial Identity’, in Maids and Mistresses, Cousins and Queens: Women’s Alliances in Early Modern England, ed. Susan Frye and Karen Robertson (New York: Oxford University Press, 1998), 259–73. On Wroth, see Kim Hall, Things of Darkness: Economies of Race and Gender in Early Modern England (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1995), chapter 4, ‘Race and the English Woman Writer’.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Bernadette Andrea, ‘Black Skin, the Queen’s Masques: Africanist Ambivalence and Feminine Author(ity) in the Masques of Blackness and Beauty’, English Literary Renaissance 29 (1999): 246–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Bernadette Andrea, Women and Islam in Early Modern English Literature (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Joyce Green MacDonald, Women and Race in Early Modern Texts (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002), 7n.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  47. Theodora Jankowski, Pure Resistance: Queer Virginity in Early Modern English Drama (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Harriette Andreadis, Sappho in Early Modern England: Female Same-Sex Literary Erotics 1550–1714 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2001); Valerie Traub, The Renaissance of Lesbianism in Early Modern England (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Margaret W. Ferguson, Dido’s Daughters: Literacy, Gender, and Empire in Early Modern England and France (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2003). See also Eve Rachele Sanders, Gender and Literacy on Stage in Early Modern England (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998); Heidi Brayman Hackel, Reading Material in Early Modern England: Print, Gender, Literacy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  50. Margaret J. M. Ezell, ‘Never Boring: Or Imagine my Surprise: Interregnum Women and the Culture of Reading Practices’, in Imagining Selves: Essays in Honor of Patricia Meyer Spacks, ed. Rivka Swenson and Elise Lauterbach (Newark: University of Delaware Press, 2009), 155–69.

    Google Scholar 

  51. See Lisa Forman Cody, ed., Writings on Medicine (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  52. For more on this subject, see Margaret Ferguson and Mihoko Suzuki, ‘Literacy, Literature and Social Status’, in Palgrave Advances in Early Modern Women’s Writing, ed. Suzanne Trill (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, forthcoming, 2011).

    Google Scholar 

  53. On the Swetnam controversy, see Linda Woodbridge, Women and the English Renaissance: Literature and the Nature of Womenkind, 1540–1620 (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1984), 81–103; Cristina Malcolmson and Mihoko Suzuki, Debating Gender in Early Modern England, 1500–1700 (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Maureen Bell, ‘Women in the English Book Trade, 1557–1700’, Leipziger Jahrbuch zur Buchgeschichte 6 (1996): 13–45; ‘Women and the Opposition Press after the Restoration’, in Writing and Radicalism, ed. John Lucas (London: Longman, 1996), 39–60; ‘Mary Westwood, Quaker Publisher’, Publishing History 23 (1988): 5–66; ‘Hannah Allen and the Development of a Puritan Publishing Business, 1646–51’, Publishing History 26 (1989): 5–66; ‘Elizabeth Calvert and the Confederates’, Publishing History 32 (1992): 5–49; ‘“Her usual practices”: The Later Career of Elizabeth Calvert’, Publishing History 35 (1994): 5–64.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Margaret J. M. Ezell, The Patriarch’s Wife: Literary Evidence and the History of the Family (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1987), 144–60.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Margaret J. M. Ezell, Social Authorship and the Advent of Print (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Jill Seal Millman and Gillian Wright, eds, Early Modern Women’s Manuscript Poetry (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2005); Helen Ostovich and Elizabeth Sauer, eds, Reading Early Modern Women: An Anthology of Texts in Manuscript and Print, 1550–1700 (New York and London: Routledge, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Victoria E. Burke and Jonathan Gibson, eds, Early Modern Women’s Manuscript Writing: Selected Papers from the Trinity/Trent Colloquium (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Barbara Smith and Ursula Appelt, eds, Write or be Written: Early Modern Women Poets and Cultural Constraints (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2001); Pamela Hammons, Poetic Resistance: English Women Writers and the Early Modern Lyric (Aldershot: Ashgate: 2002). For poetry from later in the century, see Carol Barash, English Women’s Poetry, 1649–1714: Politics, Community, and Linguistic Authority (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996); Sarah Prescott and David Shuttleton, eds, Women and Poetry, 1660–1750 (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Nancy Cotton, Women Playwrights in England, c.1363–1750 (Lewisburg, PA: Bucknell University Press, 1980); Jacqueline Pearson, The Prostituted Muse: Images of Women and Women Dramatists, 1642–1737 (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Marta Straznicky, Privacy, Playreading, and Women’s Closet Drama, 1550–1700 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004); Karen Raber, Dramatic Difference: Gender, Class, Genre in the Early Modern Closet Drama (Newark: University of Delaware Press, 2001). On the performability of closet drama, see Alison Findlay and Stephanie Hodgson-Wright, with Gweno Williams, Women and Dramatic Production, 1550–1700 (Harlow: Longman, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  62. On memoirs, or ‘life-writing’, see Elspeth Graham, Hilary Hinds, Elaine Hobby, and Helen Wilcox, eds, Her Own Life: Autobiographical Writings by Seventeenth-Century Englishwomen (New York: Routledge, 1989); Sharon Seelig, Autobiography and Gender in Early Modern Literature: Reading Women’s Lives, 1600–1680 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006); Michelle M. Dowd and Julie A. Eckerle, eds, Genre and Women’s Life Writing in Early Modern England (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  63. James Daybell, ed., Early Modern Women’s Letter Writing, 1450–1700 (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  64. On sectarian women, see Phyllis Mack, Visionary Women: Ecstatic Prophecy in Seventeenth-Century England (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1992); Hilary Hinds, God’s Englishwomen: Seventeenth-Century Radical Sectarian Writing and Feminist Criticism (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1996); Teresa Feroli, Political Speaking Justified: Women Prophets in the English Revolution (Newark: University of Delaware Press, 2006). On Catholic women, see Frances Dolan, Whores of Babylon: Catholicism, Gender, and Seventeenth-Century Print Culture (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1999). On Quaker women, see Mary Garman, Judith Applegate, Margaret Benefiel, and Dortha Meredith, eds, Hidden in Plain Sight: Quaker Women’s Writings (Wallingford, PA: Pendle Hill, 1996); Bonnelyn Young Kunze, Margaret Fell and the Rise of Quakerism (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1994); Catie Gill, Women in the Seventeenth-Century Quaker Community: A Literary Study of Political Identities 1650–1700 (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Patricia Crawford, Women and Religion in England, 1500–1720 (London and New York: Routledge, 1993), 210.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Erica Longfellow, Women and Religious Writing in Early Modern England (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004); Shannon Miller, Engendering the Fall: John Milton and Seventeenth-Century Women Writers (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2008).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  67. Katharine Gillespie, Domesticity and Dissent in the Seventeenth Century: English Women’s Writing and the Public Sphere (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004), 10.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  68. For a more extended discussion on this topic, see Mihoko Suzuki, ‘What’s Political in Seventeenth-Century Women’s Political Writing?’ Literature Compass 6 (2009): 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. See, for example, Hilda L. Smith, ed., Women Writers and the Early Modern British Political Tradition (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  70. Carol Barash, English Women’s Poetry, 1649–1714: Politics, Community, and Linguistic Authority (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996). Danielle Clarke, The Politics of Early Modern Women’s Writing (Harlow: Longman, 2001) focuses on the period 1558–1640, to examine the ‘writers’ engagement, through literary means, with matters of state, culture, religion, and subjecthood … [and] the process of political signification in which women’s texts participate, whether consciously or not’, as well as whether ‘politics might be encoded in generic choices, forms of circulation and exchange, and modes of articulation’ (1). Catharine Gray, Women Writers and Public Debate in Seventeenth-Century Britain (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007) suggests that women were ‘reliant on private affiliation to ground their public identity’, emphasizing the multiplicity of ‘politically marked communities’ (3).

    Google Scholar 

  71. Susan Wiseman, Conspiracy and Virtue: Women, Writing, and Politics in Seventeenth-Century England (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007), 3, 2.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Yet even this volume does not quite indicate the wide-ranging political import of Cavendish’s plays, essays in The Worlds Olio, and her other writings. See Mihoko Suzuki, ‘The Essay Form as Critique: Reading Cavendish’s The Worlds Olio through Montaigne and Bacon (and Adorno)’, Prose Studies 22.3 (December 1999): 1–16; Joanne H. Wright, ‘Reading the Private in Margaret Cavendish: Conversations in Political Thought’, in British Political Thought in History, Literature and Theory, ed. David Armitage (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006), 212–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Amy Louise Erickson, Women and Property in Early Modern England (London and New York: Routledge, 1993); Barbara J. Todd, ‘The Remarrying Widow: A Stereotype Reconsidered’, in Women in English Society, ed. Prior, 54–92.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Mihoko Suzuki, ‘Anne Clifford and the Gendering of History’, CLIO: A Journal of Literature, History, and the Philosophy of History 30.2 (Winter 2001): 215–16. See also Mary Chan and Nancy E. Wright, ‘Marriage, Identity, and the Pursuit of Property in Seventeenth-Century England: The Cases of Anne Clifford and Elizabeth Wiseman’ and Paul Salzman, ‘Early Modern (Aristocratic) Women and Textual Property’, in Women, Property, and the Letters of the Law in Early Modern England, ed. Nancy E. Wright, Margaret W. Ferguson, and A. R. Buck (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2004), 162–82; 281–95.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Natalie Zemon Davis, ‘Gender and Genre: Women as Historical Writers, 1400–1820’, in Beyond their Sex: Learned Women of the European Past, ed. Patricia H. Labalme (New York: New York University Press, 1980), 153–82; Helen Wilcox and Sheila Otway, ‘Women’s Histories’, in Cambridge Companion to Writing of the English Revolution, ed. N. H. Keeble (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001), 148–61. On Hutchinson, see also Devoney Looser, British Women Writers and the Writing of History, 1620–1820 (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2000), 28–60. On Clifford’s reading and writing of history, see Suzuki, ‘Anne Clifford’.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Megan Matchinske, Women Writing History in Early Modern England (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009), 162n.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Elaine Hobby, ed., The Midwives Book: Or the Whole Art of Midwifry Discovered (New York: Oxford University Press, 1999);Rebecca Laroche, Medical Authority and Englishwomen’s Herbal Texts, 1550–1650 (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2009).

    Google Scholar 

  78. Londa Schiebinger, The Mind has No Sex? Women in the Origins of Modern Science (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  79. Alice T. Friedman, ‘Constructing an Identity in Prose, Plaster, and Paint: Lady Anne Clifford as Writer and Patron of the Arts’, in Albion’s Classicism: The Visual Arts in Britain, 1550–1660, ed. Lucy Gent (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1995), 359–76; Anne Myers, ‘Construction Sites: The Architecture of Anne Clifford’s Diaries’, ELH 73 (2006): 581–600. Both are reprinted in Ashgate Critical Essays on Women Writers in English 1550–1700, vol. 5: Anne Clifford and Lucy Hutchinson, ed. Mihoko Suzuki (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2009).

    Google Scholar 

  80. Patricia Phillippy, Painting Women: Cosmetics, Canvases, and Early Modern Culture (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  81. Jane Stevenson, ‘Still Kissing the Rod? Whither Next?’ Women’s Writing 14.2 (2007): 290–305; Merry E. Wiesner-Hanks, ‘A Renaissance Woman (Still) Adrift in the World’, Early Modern Women: An Interdisciplinary Journal 1 (2006): 137–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Stevenson, ‘Still Kissing the Rod?’, 291. Stevenson has contributed to this investigation through her Women Latin Poets: Language, Gender, and Authority from Antiquity to the Eighteenth Century (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005) and her anthology co-edited with Peter Davidson, Early Modern Women Poets, which includes works in Latin. Wiesner-Hanks discusses the various pressures, including pedagogical ones (the need to teach ‘world history’ and the mandate ‘to prepare students for the “global” economy’) behind the ‘transcultural’ direction scholarship is taking (‘A Renaissance Woman’, 138–39]).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  83. David Norbrook, ‘Women, the Republic of Letters, and the Public Sphere in the Mid-Seventeenth Century’, Criticism 46.2 (2004): 223–40; Julie Campbell and Anne Larsen, eds, Early Modern Women and Transnational Communities of Letters (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Bernadette Andrea, Women and Islam in Early Modern English Literature (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007); Kate Chedgzoy, Women’s Writing in the British Atlantic World: Memory, Place and History, 1550–1700 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  85. Janet Todd, ed., The Works of Aphra Behn, 7 vols. (Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  86. James Fitzmaurice, Carol L. Barash, Eugene R. Cunnar, Nancy A. Gutierrez, and Josephine A. Roberts, eds, Major Women Writers of Seventeenth-Century England (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1997); Paul Salzman, ed., Early Modern Women’s Writing: An Anthology, 1560–1700 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000); Stephanie Hodgson-Wright, ed., Women’s Writing of the Early Modern Period, 1588–1688: An Anthology (New York: Columbia University Press, 2002). On poetry, see: Marion Wynne-Davies, ed., Women Poets of the Renaissance (London and New York: Routledge, 1999); Danielle Clarke, ed., Isabella Whitney, Mary Sidney and Aemilia Lanyer: Renaissance Women Poets (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 2000). On drama, see: S. P. Cerasano and Marion Wynne-Davies, eds, Renaissance Drama by Women: Texts and Documents (London and New York: Routledge, 1996); Cerasano and Wynne-Davies, eds, Readings in Renaissance Women’s Drama: Criticism, History, and Performance (London and New York: Routledge, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  87. On this last period, see Susan Staves, A Literary History of Women’s Writing in Britain, 1660–1789 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006), chapter 1: ‘The Restoration to the death of Behn, 1660–1689’.

    Google Scholar 

  88. Margaret J. M. Ezell, ‘Domestic Papers: Manuscript Culture and Early Modern Women’s Life Writing’, in Genre and Women’s Life Writing in Early Modern England, ed. Julie A. Eckerle and Michelle M. Dowd (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2007), 33.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2011 Mihoko Suzuki

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Suzuki, M. (2011). Introduction. In: Suzuki, M. (eds) The History of British Women’s Writing, 1610–1690. The History of British Women’s Writing. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230305502_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics