Abstract
So spoke a winning John Major of himself and a losing Neil Kinnock in 1992 (Cockerell, 2010). He demonstrated a consistent belief in the theory five years later, when — behind in the polls — he eventually spoke up in favour of election debates between himself and Tony Blair. Perhaps the ‘trick’ in 2010 was that the debates only happened because none of the party leaders was confident of victory. At least since the legendary encounter between Kennedy and Nixon in 1960, British general elections have tiptoed into the foothills of discussions about holding debates, only for one or more of those involved to trip over the complicated undergrowth, fall out with each other — or simply reassert selfinterest. There is no discussion here of the debates themselves, or any conclusion about whether television election debates are right for the UK or not. This chapter looks at the main hurdles that stood in the way of debates for fifty years and how and why they were overcome at this election. In its conclusion, it briefly assesses the impact of the debates from an audience perspective. But it also analyses some of the objectives of both the broadcasters and the political parties and offers a firsthand account of the negotiations which brought about this UK first.
Every party politician that expects to lose tries that trick of debates and every politician who expects to win says no.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Ashcroft, M. (2010) Minority Verdict: The Conservative Party, The Voters and the 2010 Election. London: Biteback.
Bailey, R. (2011) ‘The Prime Ministerial Debates — are they here to stay?’, Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, due Summer 2011.
Butler, D. and Kavanagh, D. (1980) The British General Election of 1997. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Cockerell, M. (2010) ‘Why 2010 will see the first TV leaders election debate’, BBC Online, 9 April.
Coleman, S. (1997) Televised Leaders’ Debates — an Evaluation and a Proposal. London: Hansard Society, March.
Coleman, S. (2001) Televised Leaders’ Debates Revisited: UK 2001 — A Debate Odyssey. London: Hansard Society, March.
Coleman, S. (ed.) (2011) Leaders in the Living Room: Prime Ministerial Debates of 2010: Evidence, Evaluation and Some Recommendations. Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.
Kavanagh, D. and Cowley, P. (2010) The British General Election of 2010. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Mandelson, P. (2010) The Third Man. London: Harper Press.
Price, L. (2005) The Spin Doctor’s Diary. London: Hodder & Stoughton.
Schroeder, A. (2008) Presidential Debates: Fifty Years of High Risk TV. 2nd edn. New York: Columbia University Press.
Sloman, A. (1997) ‘Party Leader Debates’, internal memorandum, BBC archive, 9 January.
Tait, R. (1998) ‘The Debate That Never Happened: Television and the Party Leaders, 1997’, in Crewe, I. Gosschalk, B. and Bartle, J. (eds) Political Communications — Why Labour Won the General Election of 1997. London: Frank Cass.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2011 Ric Bailey
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bailey, R. (2011). What Took So Long? The Late Arrival of TV Debates in the UK General Election of 2010. In: Wring, D., Mortimore, R., Atkinson, S. (eds) Political Communication in Britain. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230305045_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230305045_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-230-30146-7
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-30504-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)