Advertisement

Bent: Non-Normative Embodiment as Lived Intersectionality

  • Kay Inckle
Part of the Genders and Sexualities in the Social Sciences book series (GSSS)

Abstract

Intersectionality explores how systems of oppression ‘mutually construct one another’ (Collins, 1998: 63 cited in Bredström, 2006) and, in doing so, challenges universalist analyses of power, inequality, identity and marginalisation. Intersectionality has traditionally been concerned with the ways in which gender, race and social class interact and construct diversities of experience which cannot be fully conceptualised, or properly responded to, by simply ‘adding on’ categories of oppression (Bredström, 2006; Yuval-Davis, 2006; Davis, 2008). In this chapter I explore the ‘other social divisions’ (Yuval-Davis, 2006: 194) of sexuality, disability and mental-health diagnosis/ status through a methodology, or a position, of non-normative embodiment, which also reflects the intersectional project. Kathy Davis describes the methodological imperative of intersectionality as one which embodies ‘a commitment to the situatedness of all knowledge, promising to enhance the theorist’s reflexivity by allowing her to incorporate her own intersectional location in the production of self-critical and accountable feminist theory’ (2008: 71). In this way, intersectionality ‘can — by definition — be employed by any (feminist) scholar willing to use her own social location, whatever it may be, as an analytic resource than just an identity marker’ (2008: 72). In my research I use my own non-normative, queer, disabled and gendered embodiment to interrogate the parallel intersections between the experiences of gender, sexuality (or gendered sexuality/sexualised gender), mental-health diagnosis/status and physical disability — when the latter have visible cues which are read and responded to. Visible or corporeal difference is central to ‘policing and shaming’ (Butler, 1993: 238) by which norms of oppression are reiterated.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Alexander, N. and Clare, L. (2004) ‘You Still Feel Different: The Experience and Meaning of Women’s Self-Injury in the Context of Lesbian and Bi-Sexual Identity’, Journal of Applied and Community Social Psychology 14: 70–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Angrossino, M. V. (1998) Opportunity House: Ethnographic Studies of Mental Retardation. Walnut Creek: Altamira Press.Google Scholar
  3. Babiker, G. and Arnold, L. (1997) The Language of Injury. Leicester: BPS Publications.Google Scholar
  4. Blackman, L. (2007) ‘Psychiatric Culture and Bodies of Resistance’, Body and Society 13(2): 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bracken, P. and Thomas, P. (2005) Postpsychiatiy: Mental Health in a Postmodern World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bredström, A. (2006) ‘Intersectionality: A Challenge for Feminist HIV/AIDS Research?’ European Journal of Women’s Studies 13(3): 229–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Butler, J. (1993) Bodies that Matter. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Butler, J. (2004a) Undoing Gender. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Butler, J. (2004b) Precarious Life: The Powers of Mourning and Violence. London and New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  10. Davis, K. (2008) ‘Intersectionality as a Buzzword: A Sociology of Science Perspective on What makes a Feminist Theory Successful’, Feminist Theory 9(1): 67–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Davis, K. (1995) Reshaping the Female Body: The Dilemma of Cosmetic Surgery. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Denzin, N. K. (2003) Performance Ethnography Critical Pedagogy and the Cultural Politics of Culture. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  13. Field, N. (1989) ‘Listening with the Body: An Exploration in Counter Transference’, British Journal of Psychotherapy 5(4): 512–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Frank, A. (1995) The Wounded Storyteller: Body, Illness and Ethics. London: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Garland-Thomson, R. (1997) Extraordinary Bodies: Figuring Disability in American Culture and Literature. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Inckle, K. (2005) ‘Who’s Hurting Who? The Ethics of Engaging the Marked Body’, Auto/biography 13(3): 227–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Inckle, K. (2006) ‘Off the Straight and Narrow: Or, What Happens When Embodied, Feminist Sociology Meets Queer Ethics’, unpublished seminar paper.Google Scholar
  18. Inckle, K. (2007) Writing on the Body? Thinking Through Gendered Embodiment and Marked Flesh. Newcastle-Upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
  19. Inckle, K. (2008) ‘Policing the Body: A Conversation from the Edge of Normative Femininity’, in A. Sparkes (ed.) Auto/Biography Yearbook 2007. Southampton: Cleo Publishing.Google Scholar
  20. Inckle, K. (2010) ‘Telling Tales? Using Ethnographic Fiction to Speak Embodied Truth’, Qualitative Research 10(1): 27–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kennedy Bergen, R. (1993) ‘Interviewing Survivors of Marital Rape’, in C. M. Renzetti and R. M. Lee Researching Sensitive Topics. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  22. LifeSIGNS. (2004) The LifeSIGNS Self-Injury Awareness Booklet: Information for People who Self-Injure/Self-Harm, their Friends, Family Teachers and Healthcare Professionals (UK: LifeSIGNS).Google Scholar
  23. NSHN (1996) Cutting the Risk: Self-Harm, Self-Care and Risk Reduction. (Nottingham: NSHN).Google Scholar
  24. Pembroke, L. R. (1996) Self-Harm: Perspectives from Personal Experience. London: Survivors Speak Out.Google Scholar
  25. Proctor, G. (2007) ‘Disordered Boundaries? A Critique of “Borderline Personality Disorder”’ in H. Spandler and S. Warner (eds) Beyond Fear and Control: Working with Young People who Self-Harm. Ross-on-Wye: PCCS Books.Google Scholar
  26. Ramet, S. P. (1996) (ed.) Gender Reversals and Gender Culture: Anthropological and Historical Perspectives. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Reinharz, S. (1992) Feminist Methods in Social Research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Sedgwick, P. (1982) Psycho Politics. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  29. Shakespeare, Tom, Kath Gillespie-Sells and Dominic Davies (1996) The Sexual Politics of Disability: Untold Desires. London: Cassell Press.Google Scholar
  30. Shaw, C. and Shaw, T. (2007) ‘A Dialogue of Hope and Survival’, in H. Spandler and S. Warner (eds) Beyond Fear and Control: Working with Young People Who Self-Harm. Ross-on-Wye: PCCS Books.Google Scholar
  31. Spandler, H. (1996) Who’s Hurting Who? Young People, Self-Harm, and Suicide. Manchester: 42nd Street.Google Scholar
  32. Spandler, H. and Warner, S. (eds) 2007. Beyond Fear and Control: Working with Young People Who Self-Harm. Ross-on-Wye: PCCS Books.Google Scholar
  33. Steinbugler, A. C., Press, J. E. and Johnson, D. J. (2006) ‘Gender, Race, and Affirmative Action: Operationalizing Intersectionality in Survey Research’, Gender and Society Gender and Society 20(6): 805–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sullivan, N. (2002) ‘Fleshy (Dis)figuration, or How to Make the Body Matter’, Critical Psychology: The International Journal of Critical Psychology 5: 12–29.Google Scholar
  35. Szasz, T. (2007) The Medicalization of Everyday Life. New York: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Ussher, J. (1991) Women’s Madness: Misogyny or Mental Illness? Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar
  37. Williams, S. J. and Bendelow, G. (1998) The Lived Body: Sociological Themes, Embodied Issues. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Yuval-Davis, N. (2006) ‘Intersectionality and Feminist Politics’, European Journal of Women’s Studies 13(3): 193–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kay Inckle 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kay Inckle

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations