Abstract
Balinese actors often say they much prefer performing before live audiences than in recording studios. In this chapter I shall examine some of the differences discernible in the same plays as acted in front of Balinese village audiences and as broadcast on Indonesian state television. Balinese theatre involves not just the ad-libbed exchanges between the actors, but also a — less obvious — overlapping dialogue between actors and audience. In a different and little remarked-upon way, the audience also performs. Acting to camera, with or without a tame studio audience, therefore transforms the occasion. In this instance, ‘mediatizing’ is a more complex issue than just the effect of television recording and broadcasting on theatre. For a start, it invites us to consider what is involved in dialogic models of social action and in communication itself.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Ang, I. (1991) Desperately Seeking the Audience. London: Routledge.
Bakhtin, M.M. (1984) Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics, C. Emerson (trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Bakhtin, M.M. (1984–5) ‘Towards a Philosophy of the Act’ (‘K filosofii postupka’), in Filosofiia i sotsiologiia nauki i tekhniki, A Yearbook of the Soviet Academy of Sciences, G.S. Morson and C. Emerson (trans.). Moscow: Nauka.
Baudrillard, J. (1993) ‘I Don’t Belong to the Club, To the Seraglio’, in M. Gane (ed.), Baudrillard Live: Selected Interviews. London: Routledge.
Baudrillard, J. (1995) The Gulf War Did Not Take Place, P. Patton (trans.). Sydney: Power Publications.
Becker, A.L. (1979) ‘Text-building, Epistemology and Aesthetics in Javanese Shadow Theatre’, in A.L. Becker and A.A. Yengoyan (eds), The Imagination of Reality: Essays in Southeast Asian Coherence Systems. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Collingwood, R.G. (1942) The New Leviathan or Man, Society, Civilization and Barbarism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Deleuze, G. (1994) Difference and Repetition, P. Patton (trans.). New York: Columbia University Press.
Fabian, J. (1991) ‘Dilemmas of Critical Anthropology’, in L. Nencel and P. Pels (eds), Constructing Knowledge: Authority and Critique in Social Science. London: Sage.
Geertz, C. (1973) The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.
Geertz, C. (1991) ‘An Interview with Clifford Geertz’, Current Anthropology, 32(5), 603–13.
Goodman, N. (1972) Problems and Projects. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
Gramsci, A. (1971) Selections from the Prison Notebooks. New York: International Publishers.
Hirsch, E. (1967) Validity in Interpretation. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Hobart, M. (1982) ‘Is Interpretation Incompatible with Knowledge? The Problem of Whether the Javanese Shadow Play Has Meaning’, in The Interpretive Study of Java. Second Bielefeld Colloquium on South East Asia, University of Bielefeld, May. Available at http://eprints.soas.ac.uk/7134/1/Is_interpretation_incompatible_with_knowledge.pdf, date accessed 29 October 2010.
Hobart, M. (1985) ‘Anthropos through the Looking-Glass: Or How to Teach the Balinese to Bark’, in J. Overing (ed.), Reason and Morality, ASA Monographs in Social Anthropology 24. London: Tavistock, pp. 104–34.
Hobart, M. (1990a) ‘Who Do You Think You Are? The Authorized Balinese’, in R. Fardon (ed.), Localizing Strategies: Regional Traditions of Ethnographic Writing. Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press and Washington: Smithsonian Institute, pp. 303–38.
Hobart, M. (1990b) ‘The Patience of Plants: A Note on Agency in Bali’, Review of Indonesian and Malaysian Affairs, 24(2), 90–135.
Hobart, M. (1991) ‘Criticizing Genres: Bakhtin and Bali’, in P. Baxter and R. Fardon (eds), Voice, Genre, Text — Anthropological Essays in Africa and Beyond. Manchester: Bulletin of the John Ryland Library, University of Manchester, 73(3), 195–216.
Hobart, M. (1999a) ‘The End of the World News: Articulating Television in Bali’, in L. Connor and R. Rubinstein (eds), Staying Local in the Global Village: Bali in the Twentieth Century. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
Hobart, M. (1999b) ‘As They Like It: Overinterpretation and Hyporeality in Bali’, in R. Dilley (ed), Interpretation and Context. Oxford: Berghahn.
Hough, B. (1992) Contemporary Balinese Dance Spectacles as National Ritual, Monash Centre of Southeast Asian Studies, Working Paper 74.
Hughes-Freeland, F. (1992) ‘Representation by the Other: Indonesian Cultural Documentation’, in P. Crawford and D. Turton (eds), Film as Ethnography. Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press.
Inden, R. (1990) Imagining India. Oxford: Blackwell.
Matilal, B.K. (1986) Perception: An Essay on Classical Indian Theories of Knowledge. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Poster, M. (1990) The Mode of Information. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Poster, M. (1995) The Second Media Age. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Ricoeur, P. (1976) Interpretation Theory: Discourse and the Surplus of Meaning. Fort Worth: Texas Christian University Press.
Rorty, R. (1980) Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Oxford: Blackwell.
Sokal, A. and Bricmont, J. (1998) Intellectual Impostures: Postmodern Philosopher’s Abuse of Science. London: Profile.
Spies, W. and de Zoete, B. (1938) Dance and Drama in Bali, reprinted 2002. Hong Kong: Periplus.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2011 Mark Hobart
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hobart, M. (2011). Live or Dead? Televised Theatre and its Audiences in Bali. In: Chan, F., Karpovich, A., Zhang, X. (eds) Genre in Asian Film and Television. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230301900_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230301900_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-32303-6
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-30190-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Media & Culture CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)