Abstract
Take the vague expression “tall.” Two outstanding phenomena of its vagueness seem to be:
Sorites Susceptibility. One is inclined to accept the soritical principle: (S0) For every x and y, if x is tall and y is 1 inch shorter than x, then y is tall,
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
DeRose, K. (2008). Gradable adjectives: a defense of pluralism. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 86: 141–60.
Enç, M. (1986). Towards a referential analysis of temporal expressions. Linguistics and Philosophy, 9: 405–26.
Fara, D. (2000). Shifting sands: an interest-relative theory of vagueness. Philosophical Topics, 28: 45–81.
Fara, D. (2008a). Profiling interest relativity. Analysis, 21: 1–8.
Fara, D. (2008b). Generalizing from the instances within “contextualist” accounts of vagueness. MS, Princeton University. http://www.princeton.edu/∼dfara/papers/generalize.pdf
Fine, K. (1975). Vagueness, truth and logic. Synthese, 30: 265–300.
Gaifman, H. (2002). Vagueness, tolerance and contextual logic. MS, Columbia University http://www.columbia.edu/∼hg17/VTC-latest.pdf
Heck, R. (2003). Semantic accounts of vagueness. In Beall, J. C. (ed.), Liars and Heaps, pp. 106–27. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Kamp, H. (1981). The paradox of the heap. In Mönnich, U. (ed.), Aspects of Philosophical Logic, pp. 225–77. Reidel, Dordrecht.
Kaplan, D. (1989). Demonstratives. In Almong, J., Perry, J. and Wettstein, H. (eds), Themes from Kaplan, pp. 481–563. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Keefe, R. (2007). Vagueness without context change. Mind, 116(462): 275–92.
Keefe, R. and Smith, P. (eds) (1997). Vagueness: a Reader. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Kennedy, C. (1999). Projecting the Adjective: the Syntax and Semantics of Gradability and Comparison. Garland Press, New York.
Kyburg, H. (1961). Probability and the Logic of Rational Belief. Wesleyan University Press, Middletown, Conn.
Lewis, D. (1979). Scorekeeping in a language game. The Journal of Philosophical Logic, 8: 339–59.
Makinson, D. (1965). The paradox of the preface. Analysis, 25: 205–7.
Oppenheimer, D. (2004). Spontaneous discounting of availability in frequency judgment tasks. Psychological Science, 15: 100–5.
Raffman, D. (1994). Vagueness without paradox. The Philosophical Review, 103: 41–74.
Sainsbury, M. (1990). Concepts without boundaries. In Keefe, R. and Smith, B. (eds), Vagueness: a Reader. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Shapiro, S. (2006). Vagueness in Context. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Sherman, S., Cialdini, R., Schwartzmann, D., and Reynolds, K. (1985). Imagining can heighten or lower the perceived likelihood of contracting a disease. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 11: 118–27.
Soames, S. (1999). Understanding Truth. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Soames, S. (2002). Replies. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 62: 429–52.
Stanley, J. (2003). Context, interest relativity and the sorites. Analysis, 63: 269–80.
Sweeney, P. (2010). Contextual intolerance. MS, University of Aberdeen.
Weatherson, B. (2009). Conditionals and indexical relativism. Synthese, 116: 333–57.
Weatherson, B. (2010). Vagueness as indeterminacy. In Dietz, R. and Moruzzi, S. (eds), Cuts and Clouds, pp. 77–90. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Williamson, T. (1994). Vagueness. Routledge, London.
Zardini, E. (2008). A model of tolerance. Studia Logica, 90: 337–68.
Zardini, E. (2010). First-order tolerant logics. MS, University of Aberdeen.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2011 Paula Sweeney and Elia Zardini
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sweeney, P., Zardini, E. (2011). Vagueness and Practical Interest. In: Égré, P., Klinedinst, N. (eds) Vagueness and Language Use. Palgrave Studies in Pragmatics, Language and Cognition. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230299313_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230299313_12
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-31574-1
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-29931-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave Language & Linguistics CollectionEducation (R0)