Abstract
So far the null hypothesis has been that of nonstationarity due to a unit root, the (usual) alternative being stationarity about a constant or a linear trend. The asymmetry in classical hypothesis testing favours the null hypothesis, which is the unit root in the set-up so far. There are, however, a number of tests that reverse the roles of the hypotheses, so that the null hypothesis is of stationarity (about a constant or a linear trend) and the alternative hypothesis is of a unit root, which is one example of nonstationarity; other forms of nonstationarity have also been considered (see for example, Lo, 1991; Lee and Schmidt, 1996; and see Wright, 1999, for the fractional integrated alternative).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Copyright information
© 2011 Kerry Patterson
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Patterson, K. (2011). Tests with Stationarity as the Null Hypothesis. In: Unit Root Tests in Time Series. Palgrave Texts in Econometrics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230299306_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230299306_11
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-230-25025-3
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-29930-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)