Skip to main content

‘She is not coping’: Risk Assessment and Claims of Deficit in Social Work

  • Chapter
Discourses of Deficit

Abstract

In this chapter, we focus our discussion on the professional site of statutory child protection and show how a discourse of deficit is consequential to the framing of risk in child neglect situations. To illustrate our points, we provide case study evidence from one social worker’s account of a child neglect case. We use an ethnomethodological discourse approach (Garfinkel 1964, 1967, 1996) to analyse the social worker’s written risk assessment of a child neglect situation. Risk Assessment Reports are written accounts of how the institutional member, in this case the social worker, perceives risk, and are one example among the many other types of reporting practices evident in statutory child protection (see Hall et al. 2006; Munro 2004, 2008). We argue that the analysis of such an account can therefore be revealing of how the risk situation is constructed by the institutional member, in this case a social worker (Garfinkel 1967; Hall et al. 2006; Sarangi & Roberts 1995).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aragona, J. A. & Eyberg, S. M. (1981) Neglected children: mother’s report of child behaviour problems and observed verbal behaviour. Child Development, 52(2): 596–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhatia, V. K. (2004) Worlds of Written Discourse. London/New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. (1992) Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benford, D. B. & Snow, D. A. (2000) Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26: 611–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berg, M. (1996) Practices of reading and writing: the constitutive role of the patient record in medical work. Sociology of Health & Illness, 18(4): 499–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blumer, H. (1969/1986) Symbolic Interactionism. Perspectives and Method. Berkeley/London: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonner, B. L., Crow, S. M., Logue, M. B. (1999) Fatal child neglect. In H. Dubowitz (ed.) Neglected Children: Research, Practice & Policy. Thousand Oaks/London: Sage, pp. 156–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broadhust, K., Wastell, D., White, S., Hall, C., Peckover, S., Thompson, K., Pithouse, A. & Davey, D. (2009) Performing ‘initial assessment’: identifying the latent conditions for error at the front-door of local authority children’s services. British Journal of Social Work, 40(2): 352–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buttny, R. (1993) Social Accountability in Communication. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buttny, R. & Morris, G. H. (2001) Accounting. In W. P. Robinson & H. Giles (eds.) The New Handbook of Language and Social Psychology. New York: John Wiley, pp. 285–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Candlin, C. N. (2006) Accounting for interdiscursivity: challenges to professional expertise. In M. Gotti & D. Giannone (eds.) New Trends in Specialized Discourse Analysis. Bern: Peter Lang Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Candlin, C. N. & Maley, Y. (1997) Intertextuality and interdiscursivity in the discourse of alternative dispute resolution. In B.-L. Gunnarsson, P. Linell & B. Nordberg (eds.) The Construction of Professional Discourse. London: Longman, pp. 201–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castel, R. (1991) From dangerousness to risk. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon & P. Miller (eds.) The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf, pp. 281–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chand, A. (2001) The over-representation of black children in the child protection system: possible causes, consequences and solutions. Child & Family Social Work, 5(1): 67–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cicourel, A. (2007) A personal, restrospective view of ecological validity. Text & Talk, 27(5/6): 735–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crittenden, P. M. (1999) Child neglect: causes and contributions. In H. Dubowitz (ed.) Neglected Children; Research Practice & Policy. Thousand Oaks/London: Sage, pp. 47–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dake, K. (1991) Orienting dispositions in the perception of risk. Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology, 22(1): 61–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donzelt, J. (1980) The Policing of Families. London: Hutchinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, M. (1985) Risk Acceptability According to the Social Sciences. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, M. (1990) Risk as a forensic resource. Daedalus, 119(4): 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, M. (1992) Risk and Blame: Essays in Cultural Theory. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, M. (1999) The depoliticisation of risk. In M. Douglas (ed.) Implicit Meanings: Selected Essays in Anthropology, 2nd edn. London: Routledge, pp. 218–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • English, D. J. (1998) The extent and consequences of child maltreatment. The Future of Children, 8(1): 39–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • English, D. J. & Pecora, P. J. (1994) Risk assessment as a practice method in child protective services. Child Welfare, 73(5): 451–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Firkins, A. & Candlin, C. (2006) Framing the child at risk. Health, Risk & Society, 8(3): 273–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Firkins, A. & Smith, S. (2001) Judgement as a resource in child protection practice. In C. Candlin (ed.) Research and Practice in Professional Discourse. Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong Press, pp. 309–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flynn, B. (2002) Clinical governance and governmentality. Health, Risk & Society, 4(2): 155–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gambrill, E. & Shlonsky, A. (2000) Risk assessment in context. Child & Youth Services Review, 22(11–12): 813–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garbarino, J. & Collins, C. C. (1999) Child neglect: the family with a hole in the middle. In H. Dubowitz (ed.) Neglected Children: Research, Practice & Policy. Thousand Oaks/London: Sage. pp. 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, H. (1964) Studies of the routine grounds of everyday activities. Social Problems, 11(3): 225–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, H. (1967) Studies in Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, H. (1996) Ethnomethodology’s program. Social Psychology Quarterly, 59(1): 5–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1991) Modernity and Self-identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1971) Relations in Public: Microstudies of the Public Order. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1974) Frame Analysis. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagell, A. (1998) Dangerous Care: Reviewing the Risks to Children from their Carers. London: Policy Studies Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, C., Sarangi, S. & Slembrouck, S. (1997a) Narrative transformation in child abuse reporting. Child Abuse Review, 6: 272–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, C., Sarangi, S. & Slembrouck, S. (1997b) Moral construction in social work discourse. In B. L. Gunnarsson, P. Linell & B. Nordberg (eds.) The Construction of Professional Discourse. London: Longman, pp. 265–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, C., Sarangi, S. & Slembrouck, S. (1997c) Silent and silenced voices: interactional construction of audience in social work talk. In A. Jaworski (ed.) Silence: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, C., Sarangi, S. & Slembrouck, S. (1999) The legitimation of the client and the profession: identities and roles in social work discourse. In S. Sarangi & C. Roberts (eds.) Talk, Work and Institutional Order; Discourse in Medical, Mediation and Management Settings. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 293–322.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, C. & Slembrouck, S. (2009) Communication with parents in child welfare: skills, language & interaction. Child & Family Social Work, 14(4): 461–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, C., Slembrouck, S. & Sarangi, S. (2006) Language Practices in Social Work: Categorization and Accountability in Child Welfare. London /New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, E. T. (1977/1989) Beyond Culture. New York: Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartland, N. (1989) Texts and social organization. Journal of Pragmatics, 13: 395–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holden, G. W. & Edwards, L. A. (1989) Parental attitudes towards child rearing: instruments, issues and implications. Psychological Bulletin, 106(1): 29–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horlick-Jones, T. (2005) On ‘risk work’: professional discourse, accountability and everyday action. Health, Risk & Society, 7(3): 293–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horlick-Jones, T., Rosenhead, J., Georgiou, J. R. & Loftedt, R. (2001) Decision support for organizational risk management by problem structuring. Health, Risk and Society, 3(2): 141–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howe, D. (1992) Child abuse and the bureaucratization of social work. The Sociological Review, 40(30): 491–508.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howitt, D. (1992) Child Abuse Errors. When Good Intentions Go Wrong. London: Havester-Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, S. & Scott, S. (1999) Risk anxiety and the social construction of childhood. In D. Lupton (ed.) Risk and Sociocultural Theory: New Directions and Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 86–130.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jagannathan, R. & Camasso, M. J. (1996) Risk assessment in child protective services: a canonical analysis of the case management function. Child Abuse & Neglect, 20(7): 599–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janko, S. (1994) Vulnerable Children, Vulnerable Families: The Social Construction of Child Abuse. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, J. & Gupta, A. (1998) The context of decision-making in cases of child neglect. Child Abuse Review, 7: 97–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, R. H. (1996) Responses to AIDS Awareness Discourse: A Cross-cultural Frame Analysis. Research Monograph No. 10. City University of Hong Kong.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, N. & Milner, J. (1996) Child protection decision-making. Child Abuse Review, 5: 91–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kemshall, H. (2002) Risk, Social Policy and Welfare. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemshall, H., Parton, N., Walsh, M. & Waterson, J. (1997) Concepts of risk in relation to organizational structure and functioning within the personal social services and probation. Social Policy and Administration, 31(3): 213–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krane, J. & Davies, L. (2000) Mothering and child protection practice: rethinking risk assessment. Child and Family Social Work, 5: 35–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lennings, C. (2002) Decision making in care and protection: the expert assessment. Advances in Mental Health, 1(2): 128–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Margolin, L. (1990) Fatal child neglect. Child Welfare, 69: 309–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meezan, W. & Rose, S. J. (1996) Variations in perceptions of child neglect. Child Welfare League of America, LXXV(2): 139–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. (1997) Contextualizing texts: studying organizational texts. In G. Miller & R. Dingwell (eds.) Context and Method in Qualitative Research. London: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Munro, E. (1996) Avoidable and unavoidable mistakes in child protection work. British Journal of Social Work, 26(6): 793–808.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munro, E. (1999) Common errors of reasoning in child protection work. Child Abuse & Neglect, 23(8): 745–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munro, E. (2004) A simpler way to understand the results of risk assessment instruments. Children & Youth Services Review, 26(9): 873–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munro, E. (2005) Improving practice: child protection as a systems problem. Children & Youth Service Review, 27(4): 375–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munro, E. (2008) Effective Child Protection. 2nd edn. Los Angeles/London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orbuch, T. L. (1997) People’s accounts count: the sociology of accounts. Annual Review of Sociology, 23: 455–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parton, N. (1995) The Politics of Child Abuse. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillian.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parton, N. (1996) Social work, risk and ‘the blaming system’. In N. Parton (ed.) Social Theory, Social Change and Social Work. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parton, N. (1997) Child Protection and Family Support. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Peckover, S., Hall, C. & White, S. (2009) From policy to practice: the implementation of negotiation of technologies in everyday child welfare. Children & Society, 23(2): 136–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prior, L. (2001) Rationing through risk assessment in clinical genetics: all categories have wheels. Sociology of Health and Illness, 23(5): 570–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reder, P., Duncan, S. & Grey, M. (1993) Beyond Blame: Child Abuse Tragedies Revisited. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarangi, S. (1998a) Rethinking recontextualisation in professional discourse studies: an epilogue. Text, 18(2): 301–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarangi, S. (1998b) Interprofessional case construction in social work. The evidential status of information and its reportability. Text, 18(2): 241–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarangi, S. & Candlin, C. (2003) Categorization and explanation of risk: a discourse analytical perspective. Health, Risk & Society, 5(2): 115–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scollon, R. (2001) Mediated Discourse: The Nexus of Practice. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, M. L. & Lyman, S. M. (1968) Accounts. American Sociological Review, 33: 46–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumacher, J. A., Smith, A. M. & Hayman, R. E. (2001) Risk factors for child neglect. Aggression & Violent Behavior, 6(2–3): 231–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scourfield, J. (2000) The rediscovery of child neglect. Sociological Review, 43(3): 365–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scourfield, J. & Welsh, I. (2003) Risk, reflexivity and social control in child protection: new times or same old story? Critical Social Policy, 23(3): 398–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, A. & Shaw, I. (2001) Risk research in a risk society. Research Policy & Planning, the e-Journal of the Social Services Research Group, 19(1). http://www.ssrg.org.uk/publications/rpp/2001/issuel/articlel.asp.

  • Slack, K. S., Holl, J. L., McDaniel, M., Yoo, J. & Bloger, K. (2004) Understanding the risks of child neglect: an exploration of poverty and parenting characteristics. Child Maltreatment, 9(4): 395–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slembrouck, S. (2005) Discourse, critique and ethnography: class-oriented coding in accounts of child protection. Language Sciences, 27(6): 619–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. E. (1984) Textually mediated social organization. International Social Science Journal, 99: 59–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, D. A. & Benford, R. D. (1988) Ideology, frame resonance and participant mobilization. International Social Movements Research, 1: 197–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, D. A. & Benford, R. D. (1992) Master frames and cycles of protest. In A. D. Morris & C. McClurg-Mueller (eds.) Frontiers in Social Movement Theory. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swift, K. (1995a) An outrage to common decency: historical perspectives on child neglect. Child Welfare, 74(1): 71–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tannen, D. (1993) What’s in a frame? Surface evidence for underlying expectations. In D. Tannen (ed.) Framing in Discourse. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 14–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tannen, D. & Wallat, C. (1993) Interactive frames and knowledge schemas in interaction: examples from a medical examination/interview. In D. Tannen (ed.) Framing in Discourse. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 57–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor-Goody, P., Dean, H., Munro, M. & Parker, G. (1999) Risk and the welfare state. British Journal of Sociology, 50(2): 177–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toulmin, S. (1958) The Uses of Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turnell, A. & Edwards, E. (1997) Aspiring to partnership: the signs of safety approach to child protection. Child Abuse Review, (6): 179–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turney, D. (2001) The feminizing of neglect. Child & Family Social Work, 5(1): 47–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warner, J. (2006) Inquiry reports as active texts and their function in relation to professional practice in mental health. Health, Risk & Society, 8(3): 223–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wald, M. & Woolverton, M. (1990) Risk assessment: the emperor’s new clothes? Child Welfare, 69(6): 483–511.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waugh, F. (2000) Initial assessment: a key stage in social work intervention. Australian Social Work, 53(1): 57–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weekland, J. H. & Jordon, L. (1990) Working briefly with reluctant clients, child protective services as an example. Family Therapy Case Studies, 5(2): 51–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, S., Hall, C. & Peckover, S. (2009) The descriptive tyranny the of the common assessment framework: technologies of categorization and professional practice in child welfare. British Journal of Social Work, 39(7): 1197–1217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoosun, P. (2005) Culture as deficit: a critical discourse analysis of the concept of culture in contemporary social work discourse. Journal of Sociology & Social Work, XXII: 11–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuravin, S. J. (1999) Child neglect: A review of definitions and measurements in research. In H. Dubowitz (ed.) Neglected Children: Research Practice & Policy. Thousand Oaks/London: Sage, pp. 24–46.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2011 Arthur S. Firkins & Christopher N. Candlin

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Firkins, A.S., Candlin, C.N. (2011). ‘She is not coping’: Risk Assessment and Claims of Deficit in Social Work. In: Candlin, C.N., Crichton, J. (eds) Discourses of Deficit. Palgrave Studies in Professional and Organizational Discourse. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230299023_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics