Abstract
Early modern Europe was newly concerned with diplomacy as a representative art. Medieval diplomatic messengers gradually gave way to ambassadors acting in the ongoing interests of sovereign states. The introduction of the permanent embassy is symptomatic of this transition from a series of communications to an art and practice of representation.1 Literature is also an art and practice of representation and the parallel was not lost on early modern diplomatic theorists. Their understanding of the ambassador as a faithful and persuasive representative of his sovereign, in word and deed, placed diplomatic theory in conversation with theories of rhetorical, poetic and dramatic representation.2 As many theorists noted, the Romans called ambassadors oratores, or orators, and early modern diplomatic treatises repeatedly ask how to use words well. This rhetorical approach was rooted in the broader literary and philosophical concerns of Renaissance humanism, which also shaped the period ’s literature and poetics. From the composition of Ambaxiator Brevilogus in 1436 to the 1680 publication of L’Ambassadeur et ses fonctions, European treatises on embassy engaged with many of the same rhetorical and representational considerations as contemporary European literature. These crossovers between literature and diplomacy were equally clear to literary authors. European writers as wide-ranging and influential as Torquato Tasso, LuÍs de CamÕes and Pierre Corneille drew on the analogies between literary and diplomatic representation.3 This essay traces one exceptionally important and previously unstud—ied instance of this dialogue between diplomatic theory and literary representation. It examines the personal and intellectual exchange that took place between the diplomatic theorist Alberico Gentili and the poet, diplomat and literary theorist Sir Philip Sidney in early modern England. Gentili was an Italian civil lawyer and professor at Oxford University.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes and references
K. Hamilton and R. Langhorne (1995) The Practice of Diplomacy: Its Evolution, Theory and Administration(London: Routledge), pp. 22-40; M.S. Anderson (1993) The Rise of Modern Diplomacy, 1450-1919(London: Longman), pp. 1-12, 41-2; G. Mattingly (1995) Renaissance Diplomacy(London: Cape). Note reservations in J. Watkins (2008) ‘Introduction’ in J. Watkins, ed., Toward a New Diplomatic History, special issue of The Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies, 38.1, 1-14 (4); but see D. Frigo (2000) ‘Introduction’ in D. Frigo, ed., Politics and Diplomacy in Early Modern Italy: The Structure of Diplomatic Practice, 1450-1800, trans. A. Belton (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 1-24 (p. 9).
See Timothy Hampton’s groundbreaking and insightful analysis: T. Hampton (2009) Fictions of Embassy: Literature and Diplomacy in Early Modern Europe(Ithaca: Cornell University Press). Also: D. Biow (2002) Doctors, Ambassadors, Secretaries: Humanism and Professions in Renaissance Italy(Chicago: University of Chicago Press), pp. 16, 101-52; A. de Wicquefort (1716) The Embassador and His Functions, trans. J. Digby (London: Bernard Lintott; repr. Leicester: Centre for the Study of Diplomacy, University of Leicester, 1997), p. 294; and, for Ambaxiator Brevilogus, Hampton (2009), pp. 18-19.
For typical treatments: K. Duncan-Jones (1991) Sir Philip Sidney: Courtier Poet(London: Hamish Hamilton), p. 271; J.A. van Dorsten (1962) Poets, Patrons, and Professors: Sir Philip Sidney, Daniel Rogers, and the Leiden Humanists(London: Oxford University Press), p. 91.
See particularly: Hampton (2009); Watkins (2008); B. Charry and G. Shahani (2009), eds, Emissaries in Early Modern Literature and Culture: Mediation, Transmission, Traffic, 1550-1700 (Farnham: Ashgate); J. Powell (2005) ‘“For Caesar’s I am”: Henrician Diplomacy and Representations of King and Country in Thomas Wyatt’s Poetry’, The Sixteenth Century Journal 36.2, 415-31; J. Watkins (2009) ‘Shakespeare’s 1 Henry VI and the Tragedy of Renaissance Diplomacy’ in C. Levin and J. Watkins Shakespeare’s Foreign Worlds: National and Transnational Identities in the Elizabethan Age (Ithaca: Cornell University Press), pp. 51-78; H. Adlington (2008) ‘Donne and Diplomacy’ in J. Shami, ed., Renaissance Tropologies: The Cultural Imagination of Early Modern England(Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press), pp. 187-216.
P. Sidney (1989) The Defence of Poesy in K. Duncan-Jones, ed., Sir Philip Sidney: A Critical Edition of the Major Works (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 212-50 (p. 217). Subsequent references are to the page numbers of this edition and are given in the body of the text.
Plato (1993) Republic, trans. R. Waterfield (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 598b; Aristotle (1932) Poetics in W.H. Fyfe and W.R. Roberts, eds and trans., Aristotle, Poetics; ‘Longinus’ on the Sublime; Demetrius on Style(London: Heinemann), pp. 4-118 (1447a).
E. Kantorowicz (1965) ‘The Sovereignty of the Artist: A Note on Legal Maxims and Renaissance Theories of Art’ in Selected Studies(Locust Valley, NY: J.J. Augustin), pp. 352-65 (pp. 352-5).
K. Eden (1986) Poetic and Legal Fiction in the Aristotelian Tradition(Princeton: Princeton University Press), pp. 156-76.
A. Gentili (1585) De Legationibus Libri Tres (London: Thomas Vautrollerius).
A. Wood (1691-92) Athenα Oxoniensis, 2 vols (London: Thomas Bennet), I, p. 314; B. Kingsbury (1998) ‘Confronting Difference: The Puzzling Durability of Gentili’s Combination of Pragmatic Pluralism and Normative Judgement’, American Journal of International Law, 92, 713-23 (p. 715); T. Meron (1991) ‘Common Rights of Mankind in Gentili, Grotius and Suárez’, American Journal of International Law, 85, 110-16; P. Haggenmacher (1992) ‘Grotius and Gentili: A Reassessment of Thomas E. Holland’s Inaugural Lecture’, in H. Bull, B. Kingsbury and A. Roberts, eds, Hugo Grotius and International Relations(Oxford: Clarendon), pp. 133-76.
T.E. Holland (1898) ‘Alberico Gentili’ in Studies in International Law(Oxford: Clarendon), pp. 1-39; Gezina van der Molen’s biography is heavily indebted to Holland’s original research: G.H.J. van der Molen (1937) Alberico Gentili and the Development of International Law: His Life, Work and Times(Amsterdam: H.J. Paris).
A. Gentili (1593) ‘Commentatio’ in Ad Titulum Codicis de Maleficis(Oxford: Joseph Barnes), pp. 45-63; A. Gentili (1599) De Actoribus et de Abusu Mendacii Disputationes Duae(Hanau: G. Antonius?); see also J. Rainolds (1599) Th’Overthrow of Stage-Playes(Middelburg: Richard Schilders).
Hampton (2009), pp. 24-5, 164-5; C.N. Warren (2010) ‘Gentili, the Poets, and the Laws of War’ in B. Kingsbury and B. Straumann, eds, The Roman Foundations of the Law of Nations: Alberico Gentili and the Justice of Empire(Oxford: Oxford University Press) pp. 146-62, with thanks to Christopher Warren for generously sharing his draft in advance of publication.
Duncan-Jones (1991), p. 113; F.J. Levy (1986) ‘Sidney Reconsidered’ in A.F. Kinney, ed., Essential Articles for the Study of Sir Philip Sidney(Hamden, CT: Archon), pp. 1-13 (pp. 2-3); W. A. Ringler (1986) ‘The Myth and the Man’ in J.A. van Dorsten, D. Baker-Smith and A.F. Kinney, eds, Sir Philip Sidney: 1586 and the Creation of a Legend(Leiden: Brill/Leiden University Press), pp. 3-15 (p. 5).
Reproduced T.E. Holland (1877) ‘Praefatio’ in T.E. Holland, ed., Alberici Gentilis De Iure Belli Libri Tres(Oxford: Clarendon), pp. v-xxi (p. viii).
A. Gentili (1594) De Legationibus Libri Tres(Hanau: G. Antonius; repr. New York: Oxford University Press, 1924), fols A2v, A5r. I have silently expanded contractions. Subsequent references are to the folio and page numbers of this edition and are given in the body of the text. Translation is taken from the companion volume to this facsimile reprint: A. Gentili (1924) De Legationibus Libri Tres, introd. E. Nys and trans. G.J. Laing, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace Classics of International Law 12, 2 vols (New York: Oxford University Press), II.
F.S. Boas (1914) University Drama in the Tudor Age(Oxford: Clarendon), pp. 192-3.
See Stillman (2008), pp. 63-122; J. Ulreich (1982) ‘“The Poets Only Deliver’ ”: Sidney’s Conception of Mimesis’, Studies in the Literary Imagination, 15.1, 67-84; A.L. DeNeef (1980) ‘Rereading Sidney’s Apology’, Journal of Medieval and Renaissance Studies, 10, 155-91.
S. Adams, ed. (1995) Household Accounts and Disbursement Books of Robert Dudley, Earl of Leicester, 1558-1561, 1584-1586(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press for the Royal Historical Society), p. 212.
Stillman (2008); Å. Bergvall (1989) The‘Enabling of Judgement’: Sir Philip Sidney and the Education of the Reader(Uppsala: Uppsala Universitet), pp. 42-59; S.K. Heninger (1983) ‘Sidney and Serranus’ Plato’, English Literary Renaissance, 13.2, 141-61; G. Warkentin (1990) ‘Sidney’s Authors’ in M.J.B. Allen and others, eds, Sir Philip Sidney’s Achievements(New York: AMS Press), pp. 69-89.
Plato (1578) Platonis Opera Quae Extant Omnia, ed. H. Estienne and trans. and introd. J. de Serres, 3 vols (Geneva: Henri Etienne), I, fols **.ir-**.vv(fols **.vv).
Plato (1993), p. 348 (597e); S. Orgel (1975) The Illusion of Power: Political Theatre in the English Renaissance(Berkeley: University of California Press), pp. 40, 89; F.A. Yates (1975) Astraea: The Imperial Theme in the Sixteenth Century(London: Routledge).
Plato (1953) Cratylus in Cratylus, Parmenides, Greater Hippias, Lesser Hippias, trans. H.N. Fowler, rev. edn. (London: Heinemann), pp. 7-191 (408a-b).
Gentili must be referring to 29b; see Plato (1952) Timaeus, in Timaeus, Critias, Cleitophon, Menexenus, Epistles, ed. and trans. R.G. Bury, rev. edn. (London: Heinemann), pp. 16-253 (29b); for the other translations see: Plato (1581) Omnia D. Platonis Opera, trans. M. Ficino (Venice: H. Scotus), p. 405; Plato (1561) Platonis Atheniensis Philosophi Summi ac Penitus Divini Opera, trans. J. Cornarius (Basil: H. Frobenius and N. Episcopius), p. 734.
Plato (1930-35) The Republic, introd. and trans. P. Shorey, 2 vols (London: Heinemann), II, 597e.
Heninger (1983), p. 159; M.J. Doherty (1991) The Mistress-Knowledge: Sir Philip Sidney’s Defence of Poesie and Literary Architectonics in the English Renaissance(Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press), pp. 133-80.
Among others: B. Worden (1996) The Sound of Virtue: Philip Sidney’s Arcadia and Elizabethan Politics(London: Yale University Press), p. 65; D. Alwes (2004) Sons and Authors in Elizabethan England(Newark: University of Delaware Press), p. 95.
J. Bernard (1996-97) ‘Metanarrative and Desire in the New Arcadia’, Sidney Newsletter & Journal, 14.2, 33-42 (34); M. McCanles (1989) The Text of Sidney’s Arcadian World(Durham NC: Duke University Press), p. 157.
P. Sidney (1987) The Countess of Pembroke’s Arcadia(New Arcadia), ed. V. Skretkowicz (Oxford: Clarendon Press), p. 28. Subsequent references are to the page numbers of this edition and are given in the body of the text.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2011 Joanna Craigwood
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Craigwood, J. (2011). Sidney, Gentili, and the Poetics of Embassy. In: Adams, R., Cox, R. (eds) Diplomacy and Early Modern Culture. Early Modern Literature in History. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230298125_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230298125_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-31626-7
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-29812-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)