Skip to main content

Abstract

We propose a portfolio-selection model that maximizes expected returns subject to a time-varying value-at-risk constraint. The model allows for time-varying skewness and kurtosis of portfolio distributions estimating the model parameters by weighted maximum likelihood in an increasing-window setup. We determine the best daily investment recommendations in terms of percentage to borrow or lend and the optimal weights of the assets in a risky portfolio. An empirical application illustrates in an out-of-sample context which models are preferred from a statistical and economic point of view.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Artzner, P., Delbaen, F., Eber, J. and Heath, D. (1999) “Coherent Measures of Risk,” Mathematical Finance, 9 (3): 203–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bollerslev, T. (1986) “Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity,” Journal of Econometrics, 52 (4): 5–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, R., Huisman, R. and Koedijk, K. (2001) “Optimal Portfolio Selection in a Value-at-Risk Framework,” Journal of Banking and Finance, 25 (9): 1789–1804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Consigli, G. (2002), G. (2002) “Tail Estimation and Mean-VaR Portfolio Selection in Markets Subject to Financial Inestability,” Journal of Banking and Finance, 26 (7): 1355–1382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ding, Z., Granger, C. and Engle, R. (1993) “A Long Memory Property of Stock Market Returns and a New Model,” Journal of Empirical Finance, 1 (1): 83–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engle, R. and Manganelli, S. (2004) “CAViaR: Conditional Autoregressive Value at Risk by Regression Quantile,” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 22 (4): 367–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, J., Kirby, C. and Ostdiek, B. (2001) “The Economic Value of Volatility Timing,” Journal of Finance, 56 (1): 329–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frey, R. and McNeil, A. (2002) “VaR and Expected Shorfall in Portfolios of Dependent Credit Risks: Conceptual and Practical Insights,” Journal of Banking and Finance, 26 (7): 1317–1334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giot, P. and Laurent, S. (2003) “Value-at-Risk for Long and Short Trading Positions,” Journal of Applied Econometrics, 18 (6): 641–663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giot, P. and Laurent, S. (2004) “Modelling Daily Value-at-Risk Using Realized Volatility and ARCH Type Models,” Journal of Empirical Finance, 11 (3): 379–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gourieroux, C., Laurent, J. and Scaillet, O. (2000) “Sensitivity Analysis of Values at Risk,” Journal of Empirical Finance, 7 (3–4): 225–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guermat, C. and Harris, D. (2002) “Forecasting Value at Risk Allowing for Time Variation in the Variance and Kurtosis of Portfolio Returns,” International Journal of Forecasting, 18 (3): 409–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, B. (1994) “Autoregressive Conditional Density Estimation,” International Economic Review, 35 (3): 705–730.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jondeau, E. and Rockinger, M. (2003) “Conditional Volatility, Skewness, and Kurtosis: Existence, Persistence, and Comovements,” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 27 (10): 1699–1737.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jorion, P. (1997) Value-at-Risk: The New Benchmark for Controlling Market Risk. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kupiec, P. (1995) “Techniques for Verifying the Accuracy of Risk Measurement Models,” The Journal of Derivatives, 3 (2): 174–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, P. and Laurent, S. (2001) “Modelling Financial Time Series using GARCHtype Models with a Skewed Student Distribution for the Innovations,” Working Paper 0125, Institut de Statistique, Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvainla-Neuve, Belgium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markowitz, H.M. (1952) “Portfolio Selection,” Journal of Finance, 7 (1): 77–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. (1980) “On Estimating the Expected Return on the Market: An Exploratory Investigation,” Journal of Financial Economics, 8 (4): 323–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mittnik, S. and Paolella, M. (2000) “Conditional Density and Value-at-Risk Prediction of Asian Currency Exchange Rates,” Journal of Forecasting, 19 (4): 313–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patton, A. (2004) “On the Out-of-sample Importance of Skewness and Asymmetric Dependence for Asset Allocation,” Journal of Financial Econometrics, 2 (1): 130–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szegö, G. (2002) “Measures of Risk,” Journal of Banking and Finance, 26 (7): 1253–1272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2011 Erick W. Rengifo and Jeroen V.K. Rombouts

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rengifo, E.W., Rombouts, J.V.K. (2011). Portfolio Selection with Time-Varying Value-at-Risk. In: Gregoriou, G.N., Pascalau, R. (eds) Financial Econometrics Modeling: Market Microstructure, Factor Models and Financial Risk Measures. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230298101_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics