Skip to main content

Abstract

In this paper, we analyze the role played by market liquidity and tradingrelated variables in forecasting one-day-ahead “value-at-risk” (VaR). We use the quantile-regression methodology, as this allows us to directly study the effects of the predictive variables on the tail distribution of returns. Our empirical setting builds on the so-called CAViaR model put forward by Engle and Manganelli (2004) and extends it empirically by incorporating further information beyond volatility. The backtesting VaR analysis, based on unconditional and conditional coverage tests, reveals that liquidity and trading variables considerably enhance the VaR performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Admati, A.R. and Pfleiferer, P. (1988) “A Theory of Intraday Patterns: Volume and Price Variability,” Review of Financial Studies, 1 (1): 3–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, C. and Sheedy, E. (2008) “Developing a Stress Testing Framework Based on Market Risk Models,” Journal of Banking & Finance, 32 (10): 2220–2236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Artzner, P., Dealbaen, F., Eber, J.M. and Heath, D. (1999) “Coherent Measure of Risk,” Mathematical Finance, 9 (3): 203–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bangia, A., Diebold, F.X., Schuermann, T. and Stroughair, J.D. (1998) “Modeling Liquidity Risk with Implications for Traditional Market Risk Measurement and Management,” Working Paper, Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bassett, G.W. and Koenker, R. (1982) “An Empirical Quantile Function for Linear Models with iid Errors.” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 77 (378): 407–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blume, L., Easly, D. and O’Hara, M. (1994) “Market Statistics and Technical Analysis: The Role of Volume,” Journal of Finance, 49 (1): 153–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bollerslev, T. and Melvin, M. (1994) “Bid-Ask Spreads and the Volatility in the Foreign Exchange Market,” Journal of International Economics, 36 (3–4): 355–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bollerslev, T. and Woolridge, J.M. (1992) “Quasi-Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Inference in Dynamic Models with Time-Varying Covariances,” Econometric Reviews, 11 (2): 143–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J.Y., Grossman, S.J. and Wang, J. (1993) “Trading Volume and Serial Correlation in Stock Returns,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108 (4): 905–939.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chordia, T., Roll, R. and Subrahmanyam, A. (2001) “Market Liquidity and Trading Activity,” Journal of Finance, 56 (2): 501–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christoffersen, P.F. (1998) “Evaluating Interval Forecasts,” International Economic Review, 39 (4): 841–862.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dupuy, P. (2008) “Imperfect Information and Contagion in Capital Markets: A Test on Emerging Markets Sovereign Bonds,” Journal of Emerging Market Finance, 7 (2): 103–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easley, D., Keyfer, N. and O’Hara, M. (1997) “One Day in the Life of a very Common Stock,” Review of Financial Studies, 10 (3): 805–835.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engle, R. and Manganelli, S. (2004) “CAViaR: Conditional Autoregressive Value at Risk by Regression Quantiles,” Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 22 (4): 367–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goffe, W.L, Ferrier, G.D. and Rogers, J. (1994) “Global Optimization of Statistical Functions with Simulated Annealing,” Journal of Econometrics, 60 (1–2): 65–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, P.R. and Lunde, A. (2005) “A Forecast Comparison of Volatility Models: Does Anything Beat a GARCH (1,1)?” Journal of Applied Econometrics, 20 (7): 873–889.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarrow, R. and Protter, P. (2009) “Liquidity Risk and Risk Measure Computation,” Forthcoming Review of Futures Markets, Ithaca: Cornell University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarrow, R. and Subramanian, A. (1997) “Mopping up Liquidity,” Risk, 10 (12): 170–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorion, P. (2007) Value at Risk: The New Benchmark for Controlling Market Risk. Irwin, Chicago: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koenker, R. and Bassett, G. (1978) “Regression Quantiles,” Econometrica, 46 (1): 33–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuester, K., Mittnik, S. and Paolella, M.S. (2006) “Value-at-Risk Prediction: A Comparison of Alternative Strategies,” Journal of Financial Econometrics, 4 (1): 53–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kupiec, P. (1995) “Techniques for Verifying the Accuracy of Risk Measurement Models,” The Journal of Derivatives, 3 (2): 73–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoll, H.S. (1989) “Inferring the Components of the Bid-Ask Spread: Theory and Empirical Tests,” Journal of Finance, 44 (1): 115–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J. (1999) “A Quantile Regression Approach to Estimating the Distribution of Multiperiod Returns.” Journal of Derivatives, 7(1): 64–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J. (2008) “Estimating Value at Risk and Expected Shortfall Using Expectiles,” Journal of Financial Econometrics, 6 (2): 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2011 Lidia Sanchis-Marco and Antonio Rubia

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sanchis-Marco, L., Rubia, A. (2011). The Value of Liquidity and Trading Activity in Forecasting Downside Risk. In: Gregoriou, G.N., Pascalau, R. (eds) Financial Econometrics Modeling: Market Microstructure, Factor Models and Financial Risk Measures. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230298101_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics