Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Functions of Performance Measurement in Social Entrepreneurship: Control, Planning and Accountability

  • Chapter
Values and Opportunities in Social Entrepreneurship

Abstract

Today, systems of performance measurement (metrics) are central to all organizational strategy and operations (Austin, 1996; Rousseau, 2006). Metrics are costly but valuable since they offer the tantalizing prospect of capturing complex situations in an apparently objective and impartial fashion to minimize risk and maximize return. Metrics offer internal actors in an organization the tools with which to assemble the data that allow them to control processes and make effective decisions. For external actors metrics allow performance assessments to be made that drive efficient resource allocation and build an argument for (or against) society granting the organization a mandate to operate by creating (or destroying) perceptions of its accountability and legitimacy. Metrics now pervade society on a trajectory that began with the establishment of consistent reporting practices in the private sector (Hopwood, 1983) and that now encompasses the public sector (Bevan and Hood, 2006; Osbourne and Gaebbler, 1992) and, increasingly, the third sector too (Paton, 2003). Today metrics are a defining feature of our modernity (Giddens, 1990). Indeed, there has never before been so much focus on measurement across the industrialized world (Power, 1994a, 1994b).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alvord, S., Brown, L. and Letts, C. 2004. Social Entrepreneurship and Societal Transformation: An Exploratory Study. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 40(3): 260–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K. 1951. Social Choice and Individual Values. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, R. 1996. Measuring and Managing Performance in Organisations. New York: Dorset House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. 1992. Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bevan, C. and Hood, C. 2006. What’s Measured is What Matters: Targets and Gaming in the English Public Health Care System. Public Administration, 84(3): 517–38. BOND—British Overseas NGOs for Development 2006. A BOND Approach to Quality in Non-Governmental Organization: Putting Beneficiaries First. A report by Keystone and AccountAbility for BOND, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boschee, J. and McClurg, D. 2003. Toward a Better Understanding of Social Entrepreneurship: Some Important Distinctions. Minnesota: Institute for Social Entrepreneurs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chipman, J. and Moore, J. 1978. The New Welfare Economics 1939–1974. International Economic Review, 19(3): 547–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clotfelter, C. 1992. The Distributional Consequences of Nonprofit Activities. In Clotfelter, C. (ed), Who Benefits From The Nonprofit Sector?: 1–23, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connolly, C. and Hyndman, N. 2000. Charity Accounting: An Empirical Analysis of the Impact of Recent Changes. The British Accounting Review, 32(1): 77–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dart, R. 2004. The Legitimacy of Social Enterprise. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 14(4): 411–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dees, J. G. 1994. Social Enterprise: Private Initiatives for Common Good. Harvard: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dees, J. G. 1998a. The Meaning of Social Entrepreneurship. Available at http://faculty.fuqua.duke.educenters/case/files/dees-SE.pdf.

  • Dees, J. G. 1998b. Enterprising Nonprofits. Harvard Business Review, 76(1): 54–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dees, J. G. 2003. Social Entrepreneurship Is about Innovation and Impact, Not Income. Discussion paper on Social Edge (http://www.socialedge.org), Skoll Center for Social Entrepreneurship, Said Business School, University of Oxford.

  • DiMaggio, P. and Anheier, H. 1990. The Sociology of Nonprofit Organizations and Sectors. Annual Review of Sociology, 16(1): 137–59. Discussion paper available at CASE website, Duke University: http://www.caseatduke.org articles/1004/corner.htm.

  • Edwards, M. and Hulme, D. 1995. Introduction: NGO Performance and Accountability. In Edwards, M., and Hulme, D. (eds), Beyond the Magic Bullet: NGO Performance and Accountability in the Post Cold War World: 1–20. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, M. and Hulme, D. 1996. Too Close For Comfort: The Impact of Official Aid on Non-Governmental Organisations. World Development, 24(6): 961–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elkington, J. 1997. Cannibals with Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business. London: Capstone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, J. 1999. Social Return on Investment: Exploring Aspects of Value Creation. REDF box set, 2, ch. 8. San Francisco: Roberts Enterprise Development Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, J. 2003. The Blended Value Proposition: Integrating Social and Financial Returns. California Management Review, 45(4): 35–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etzioni, A., Cantor, R., Henry, S., and Rayner, S. 1992. Making Markets: Interdisciplinary Perspective on Economic Exchange. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, A. 1980. Welfare Economics and Social Choice Theory. Boston: Martinus Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Forbes, D. 1998. Measuring the Unmeasurable. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 27(2): 183–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. 1990. The Consequences of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, R. 2002. The Social Accounting Project and Accounting Organizations and Society: Privileging Engagement, Imaginings, New Accountings And Pragmatism Over Critique?, Accounting Organizations and Society, 27(7): 687–708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haakonssen, K. (ed) 2002. Adam Smith: The Theory of Moral Sentiments. Cambridge Texts in the History of Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. 2007. A Brief History of Neo-Liberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hood, C. 1991. A Public Management for All Seasons. Public Administration, 69(1): 3–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopwood, A. 1978. Towards an Organizational Perspective for the Study of Accounting and Information Systems. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 3(1): 3–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopwood, A. 1983. On Trying to Study Accounting in the Contexts in which it Operates. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 8(3): 287–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopwood, A. and Miller, P. 1994. Accounting as Social and Institutional Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge Studies in Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopwood, A., Burchell, S., and Clubb, C. 1994. Value-Added Accounting and National Economic Policy. In Hopwood. and Miller, Accounting As Social And Institutional Practice: 211–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, A. 2006. Helping People is Difficult: Growth and Performance in Social Enterprises Working for International Relief and Development. In Nicholls, Social Entrepreneurship: 247–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jepson, P. 2005. Governance and accountability of Environmental NGOs. Environmental Science and Policy, 8(5): 515–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • John, R. 2007. Beyond The Cheque: How Venture Philanthropists Add Value. Skoll Centre for Social Entrepreneurship, available at: http://www.sbs.ox.ac.ukskoll/ research/Short+papers/Short+papers.htm.

  • Kendall, J. and Knapp, M. 2000. Measuring the Performance of Voluntary Organizations. Public Management, 2(1): 105–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leadbeater, C. 1997. The Rise of the Social Entrepreneur. London: Demos.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeGrand, J. 2003. Motivation, Agency, and Public Policy: Of Knights and Knaves, Pawns and Queens. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • LeGrand, J. and Bartlett, W. (eds) 1993. Quasi-Markets and Social Policy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Light, P. 2008. The Search for Social Entrepreneurship. Washington, DC: Brookings Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lister, S. 2003. NGO legitimacy—Technical Issue or Social Construct. Critique of Anthropology, 23(2): 175–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Little, I. 1950. A Critique of Welfare Economics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loft, A. 1994. Accountancy and the First World War. In Hopwood. and Miller, Accounting as Social and Institutional Practice: 116–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. and Huberman, A. 1994. Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook (2nd edn). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, P. 1994. Accounting As Social And Institutional Practice: An Introduction. In Hopwood. and Miller, Accounting as Social and Institutional Practice: 1–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulgan. G. 2007. Social Innovation. Skoll Centre for Social Entrepreneurship, available at: http://www.sbs.ox.ac.ukskoll/research/Short+papers/Short+ papers.htm.

  • Nicholls, A. 2004. Social Entrepreneurship: The Emerging Landscape. In Crainer, S. and Dearlove, D. (eds), The Financial Times Handbook of Management (third edn): 636–43. Harlow: FT Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls, A. 2006. Social Entrepreneurship. In Jones-Evans, D. and Carter, S. (eds), Enterprise and Small Business: Principles, Practice and Policy (second edn): 220–42. Harlow: FT Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls, A. (ed) 2008a. Social Entrepreneurship: New Models of Sustainable Social Change (paperback edn). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls, A. 2008b. Capturing the Performance of the Socially Entrepreneurial Organisation (SEO): An Organisational Legitimacy Approach. In Robinson, J., Mair, J. and Hockerts, K. (eds), International Perspectives on Social Entrepreneurship Research: 27–74. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls, A. 2009, “We Do Good Things, Don’t We?”: “Blended Value Accounting” in Social Entrepreneurship, Accounting, Organizations, and Society, 34(6/7): 755–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls, A. and Opal, C. 2005. Fair Trade: Market-Driven Ethical Consumption. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls, A. and Cho, A. 2006. Social Entrepreneurship: The Structuration of a Field. In Nicholls, A. (ed.), Social Entrepreneurship: New Paradigms of Sustainable Social Change: 99–118. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls, A. and Young, R. 2008. Introduction: The Changing Landscape of Social Entrepreneurship; vii–xxiii, In Nicholls, Social Entrepreneurship.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connell, J. 1982. Welfare Economic Theory. Boston: Auburn House Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Offer, A. 2007. The Challenge of Affluence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Osbourne, D. and Gaebler, T. 1992. Reinventing Government. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paton, R. 2003. Managing and Measuring Social Enterprises. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Power, M. 1994a. The Audit Society. In Hopwoodand Miller, Accounting As Social and Institutional Practice: 299–316. Power, M., 1994b. The Audit Explosion. London: Demos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Power, M. 2003. Auditing and The Production of Legitimacy. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28(4): 379–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie, J. 2003. The Applications of Qualitative Methods to Social Research. In Ritchie, J. and Lewis, J. (eds), Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers: 24–46. London: Sage. REDF—Roberts Enterprise Development Foundation 2000. SROI Methodology, Roberts Enterprise Development Foundation. San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, D. 2006. Is There Such a Thing as “Evidenced-Based Management”? Academy of Management Review, 31(2): 256–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suchman, M. 1995. Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3): 517–610.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor-Gooby, P. 2004. New Risks, New Welfare: The Transformation of the European Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor-Gooby, P. 2006. New Approaches to Expert and Institutional Risk. Journal of Risk Research, 9(1): 79–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young. R. 2006. For What It’s Worth: Social Value and the Future of Social Entrepreneurship. In Nicholls, Social Entrepreneurship: 56–73.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Alex Nicholls
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Copenhagen Business School, Denmark

    Kai Hockerts (Associate Professor) (Associate Professor)

  2. Department of General Management, IESE Business School, Universidad de Navarra, Spain

    Johanna Mair (Associate Professor) (Associate Professor)

  3. Rutgers Business School, New Jersey, USA

    Jeffrey Robinson (Assistant Professor of Management and Entrepreneurship) (Assistant Professor of Management and Entrepreneurship)

Copyright information

© 2010 Alex Nicholls

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nicholls, A. (2010). The Functions of Performance Measurement in Social Entrepreneurship: Control, Planning and Accountability. In: Hockerts, K., Mair, J., Robinson, J. (eds) Values and Opportunities in Social Entrepreneurship. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230298026_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation