Skip to main content

Partnerships and Power in American Grand Strategy

  • Chapter
NATO: The Power of Partnerships

Part of the book series: New Security Challenges Series ((NSECH))

Abstract

This chapter demonstrates the relationship between American national security objectives and the use of partnerships as a tool for managing the international security environment. Partnerships emerged in American grand strategy during the 1990s as a way to signal reassurance to new friends and old adversaries about American power. This policy of restraint shifted, however, into one of expansion in which partnerships played an important role in an offensive orientation of American grand strategy. Partnerships were also utilized to manage coalitions for military engagements led by the US. These trends are demonstrated in this chapter through the use of partnerships developed by the US via the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO). The chapter concludes by demonstrating that, due to a dramatic decline in American power and significant overseas military burdens, a new phase of partnership is emerging, with serious implications for global and regional security in the twenty-first century.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Agence France Press (2009) ‘Activists Shocked on Clinton Stance on China Rights’, 20 February 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asmus, R. D., Kugler, R. L. and Larrabee, F. S. (1993) ‘Building a New NATO’, Foreign Affairs, 4, pp. 28–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aspin, L. (1993) ‘Partnership for Peace: Remarks as Prepared for Delivery by Secretary of Defense Les Aspin to the Atlantic Council of the United States’, Marriott Hotel, Washington, D.C., 3 December 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • BBC News (2010) ‘China Accusses US of Arrogance over Taiwan Deal’, 1 February 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • BBC World Service (1998) ‘Russian Foreign Minister Begins Asian Tour’, 23 July 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilmes, L. J. and Stiglitz, J. (2010) ‘The Iraq War Will Cost Us $3 trillion and Much More’, Washington Post, 9 March 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • British Broadcasting Service (1998) ‘Ukraine and Turkey Move Closer’, 13 February 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M. E., Cote, Jr. O. C., Lynn-Jones, S. M. and Miller, S. E. (eds) (1997) America’s Strategic Choices (Cambridge: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, L. (2004) ‘Jones Failure of Some NATO Nations to Join Iraq Training Effort is “Disturbing” ’, Stars and Stripes, 24 November 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daalder, I. and Goldgeier, J. M. (2006) ‘Global NATO’, Foreign Affairs, 85:5, pp. 105–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Defense (1996) ‘U.S.-Ukraine Security Committee Report’, 15 November 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Defense (1997a) ‘News Briefing’, 17 April 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Defense (1997b) ‘Remarks Prepared for Delivery by U.S. Secretary of Defense William S. Cohen, Academy of the Armed Forces of Ukraine’, 12 July 1997. http://www.defense.gov/releases/release.aspx?releaseid=1347, date accessed 26 April 2010.

  • Department of Defense (2009) ‘QDR Report: Draft as of December 3, 2009’ http://www.politico.com/blogs/laurarozen/0110/QDR_draft_leaks.html, date accessed 27 January 2010.

  • Deudney, D. and Ikenberry, G. J. (2009) ‘The Unraveling of the Cold War Settlement’, Survival, 51:6, pp. 39–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilpin, R. (1981) War and Change in World Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, C. L. and Kaufmann, C. (1998) ‘What Is the Offensive-Defense Balance and How Can We Measure It?’, International Security, 22:4, pp. 44–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ikenberry, G. J. (2001) After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order after Major War (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay, S. and Yaphe, J. (1997) ‘Turkey’s International Affairs: Shaping the US-Turkey Strategic Partnership’, INSS Strategic Forum, no. 122, pp. 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay, S. (2000) ‘What is a Strategic Partnership’, Problems of Post-Communism, 47:3, pp. 22–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay, S. (2003a) ‘Security in Eurasia: Geopolitical Constraints and the Dynamics of Multilateralism’ in J. Sperling, S. Kay and S. V. Papacosma (eds) Limiting Institutions?: The Challenge of Eurasian Security Governance (Manchester: Manchester University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay, S. (2003b) ‘Putting NATO Back Together Again’, Current History, 102:662, pp. 106–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay, S. (2006) Global Security in the Twenty-first Century: The Quest for Power and the Search for Peace (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield).

    Google Scholar 

  • Krishna Guha (2010) ‘Paulson Claims Russia Tried to Foment Fannie-Freddie Crisis’, Financial Times, 29 January 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mearsheimer, J. (2001) The Tragedy of Great Power Politics (New York: W. W. Norton).

    Google Scholar 

  • NATO Office of Information and Press (1994) ‘Partnership for Peace Invitation’ (Issued by the heads of state and government participating in the meeting of the North Atlantic Council held at NATO Headquarters, Brussels, 10–11 January 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • New York Times (2010) ‘Ambassador Eikenberry’s Cables on U.S. Strategy in Afghanistan’, 26 January 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Opall-Rome, B. (1997) ‘US-Sino Slogan Elicits Confusion’, Defense News, 10 November 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pape, R. A. (2009) ‘Empire Falls’, The National Interest Online, 22 January 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pew Research Center (2009) ‘U.S. Seen as Less Important, China as More Powerful’, 3 December 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reuters, 5 December 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, J. P. (1998) ‘Press Statement, U.S. Department of State’, 15 July 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schake, K. (2010) ‘Stop Spending So Much on Defense’, ForeignPolicy, 20 January 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweller, R. (1994) ‘Bandwagoning for Profit: Bringing the Revisionist State Back In’, International Security, 19:1, pp. 72–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sens, A. (2001) ‘From Collective Defense to Cooperative Securty?: The New NATO and Nontraditional Challenges and Mission’ in S. V. Papacosma, S. Kay and M. Rubin (eds) NATO After Fifty Years (Wilmington, DE: Scholarly Resources).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanker, T. and Kulish, N. (2008) ‘Russia Lashes out on Missile Deal’, New York Times, 15 August 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Press International, 12 January 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Evera, S. (1998) ‘Offense, Defense, and Causes of War’, International Security, 22:4, pp. 5–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voice of America (2009) ‘U.S.-Georgia Partnership’, 29 June 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walt, S. (1985) ‘Alliance Formation and the Balance of World Power’, International Security, 22:4, pp. 3–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White House (1997a) ‘Remarks by President Clinton and President Constantinescu to Citizens of Romania’, 11 July 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • White House (1997b) ‘Joint U.S. China Statement’, 29 October 1997, http://clinton6.nara.gov/1997/10/1997-10-29-joint-us-china-statement.html, date accessed 26 April 2010.

  • White House Information Service (1994) ‘Background Briefing’, 27 May 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitlock, C. (2010) ‘Obama 2011 Budget Request: Defense Department’, Washington Post, 1 February 2010.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2011 Sean Kay

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kay, S. (2011). Partnerships and Power in American Grand Strategy. In: Edström, H., Matlary, J.H., Petersson, M. (eds) NATO: The Power of Partnerships. New Security Challenges Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230297500_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics