Abstract
The decline of labour activism has been noted as a global phenomenon. One important reason for this decline has been said to be the change in the structure of labour. First, new labour practices — outsourcing and contract work — have meant that relatively smaller numbers of workers are now concentrated in single locations, in Fordist, assembly-line production centres. Secondly, as manufacturing units become capital intensive, and high technology driven, large numbers of semi-skilled or unskilled workers are replaced by a small, skilled workforce, frequently with highly specialized, individualized functions, and individual, rather than collective pay scales and benefits: all of this takes away the teeth of collective action within the factory in particular and in the workforce in general. Thus the classical management-labour conflict may no longer be so significant. Finally, as is well known, there has occurred a rapid expansion of the informal sector, and in the numbers of those who are self-employed, or employed in small and unregulated enterprises. In this domain industrial dispute has few overt or political manifestations. It is in this sense that industrial conflict is no longer seen to be a key to understanding political or social dynamics.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Castells, M. (1978) City, Class and Power, London: Macmillan Press.
Centre for Monitoring the Indian Economy (CMIE) (2003) Monthly Review of the Karnataka Economy (May).
Chandravarkar, R. (1999) ‘Questions of Class: the General Strikes in Bombay 1928–29’, in J. Parry et al. (eds), The Worlds of Indian Industrial Labour, New Delhi: Sage.
Edwards, P. (2000)‘Late Twentieth Century Workplace Relations’, in R. Crompton et al. (eds), Renewing Class Analysis, Oxford: Basil Blackwell, pp. 141–64.
Gayatri, K. (2002) ‘Genuineness of the Capital Investment Subsidy: a Study of Bangalore Division’, Institute for Social and Economic Change, Bangalore (mimeo).
Giddens, A. (1984) The Constitution of Society: Outline of a Theory of Structuration, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Rajeev, M. and DasGupta, P. (2003)‘Karnataka Public Enterprises Reform Program (2000–2003)’, Institute for Social and Economic Change, Bangalore, and World Bank, New Delhi (mimeo).
Rajeev, M. and RoyChowdhury, S. (2004) ‘Contract Labour in Karnataka’s Manufacturing Industries’, Institute for Social and Economic Change and Sir Ratan Tata Trust Project, Bangalore.
RoyChowdhury, S. (2005a) ‘Labour and Economic Reforms: Disjointed Critiques’, in Jos Mooij (ed.), The Politics of Economic Reforms in India, New Delhi: Sage Publications, pp. 264–90.
RoyChowdhury, S. (2005b) ‘Labour Activism and Women in the Unorganised Sector: Garment Export Industry in Bangalore’, Economic and Political Weekly, 40, 22 and 23, 28 May–4 June.
Subramanian, D. (1980) ‘The MICO Strike: a Retrospective’, Economic and Political Weekly, 15, 22 (31 May).
Subramanian, D. (1997) ‘Bangalore Public Sector Strike, 1980–81: a Critical Appraisal, Parts I and II’, Economic and Political Weekly, 32, 15 and 16.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2010 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Roychowdhury, S. (2010). ‘Class’ in Industrial Disputes: Case Studies from Bangalore. In: Bowles, P., Harriss, J. (eds) Globalization and Labour in China and India. International Political Economy Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230297296_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230297296_9
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-31183-5
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-29729-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)