Abstract
Sprague (1986) argues that “bailout is a bad word”, that “to many it carries connotations of preference and privilege and violation of the free market principles”, and that “it sounds almost un-American”. “Preference” and “privilege” are the key words in Sprague’s statements, hence the title of this section “cherry picking”. He examines four episodes of bailout, but right from the beginning he asks the questions: “why and how were four institutions selected to be saved”, “why only these four?”, and “why did you save Continental and not my bank?”. He answers the question “why the four?”, by saying that “we were afraid not to”. But why were “we” afraid only in those four cases?
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2010 Imad A. Moosa
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Moosa, I.A. (2010). Worthy of Bailout: To be or Not to be?. In: The Myth of Too Big to Fail. Palgrave Macmillan Studies in Banking and Financial Institutions. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230295056_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230295056_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-32567-2
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-29505-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)