Skip to main content

Worthy of Bailout: To be or Not to be?

  • Chapter
The Myth of Too Big to Fail
  • 383 Accesses

Abstract

Sprague (1986) argues that “bailout is a bad word”, that “to many it carries connotations of preference and privilege and violation of the free market principles”, and that “it sounds almost un-American”. “Preference” and “privilege” are the key words in Sprague’s statements, hence the title of this section “cherry picking”. He examines four episodes of bailout, but right from the beginning he asks the questions: “why and how were four institutions selected to be saved”, “why only these four?”, and “why did you save Continental and not my bank?”. He answers the question “why the four?”, by saying that “we were afraid not to”. But why were “we” afraid only in those four cases?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2010 Imad A. Moosa

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Moosa, I.A. (2010). Worthy of Bailout: To be or Not to be?. In: The Myth of Too Big to Fail. Palgrave Macmillan Studies in Banking and Financial Institutions. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230295056_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics