Abstract
In A Midsummer Night’s Dream Shakespeare asks us to think about how the ‘imagination bodies forth / The forms of things unknown’ (V. i. 14–15). This line, in a play replete with fairies, asks us to consider the work of the imagination. How are we to imagine the imagination itself? Certainly, the way in which Shakespeare imagined his Oberon — King of the fairies, or his Titania — Queen of the fairies, or Puck, Peasebottom, Cobweb, Moth or Mustardseed, first took material shape on a page, on paper, penned, we presume, in ink. As the play says, ‘the poet’s pen / Turns them [the forms of things unknown] to shapes, and gives to airy nothing / A local habitation and a name’ (V. i. 15–17). With the help of a writing instrument, ‘airy nothing’ is turned into something. What was invisible becomes visible. What was immaterial becomes material. But is the pen just that: an instrument, a tool? Are the instruments we use to make art from the ‘airy nothing’ in our heads just that: tools which serve art?
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Aristotle., 1996. Physics. Translated by R. Waterfield. Introduction by D. Bostock. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Assmann, A., 2006. Einführung in die Kulturwissenschaft. Berlin: Erich Schmidt Verlag.
Austin, A., 1874. ‘The Vice of Reading’, Temple Bar, XLII (September): 251–7.
Behne, A., 1978. ‘Die Stellung des Publikums zur modernen deutschen Literatur [1926]’. In A. Kaes, ed. Kino-Debatte. Texte zum Verhältnis von Literatur und Film 1909–1929. Tübingen: Max Niemayer, pp. 160–3.
Benjamin, W. 1973. ‘Theses on the Philosophy of History’, Illuminations. Translated by Harry Zohn. Bungay, Suffolk: Fontana, pp.255–66.
Böhme, H., 2000. ‘Himmel und Hölle als Gefühlsräume’, in C. Benthien, A. Fleig and I. Kasten., eds. Emotionalität. Zur Geschichte der Gefühle. Köln, Weimar, Wien: Böhlau Verlag, pp. 60–81.
Butterworth, C. H., 1870. ‘Overfeeding’, Victoria Magazine 14 (November to April): 500–4.
Debray, R., 1996. Media Manifestos. Translated by E. Rauth. London: Verso.
Butterworth, C. H 2000. Transmitting Cultures. Translated by E. Rauth. New York: Columbia University Press.
Derrida, J., 1979. Spurs / Eperons. Translated by B. Harlow. Chicago: Chicago University Press).
Feather, J., 1988. A History of British Publishing. London: Routledge.
Hake, S., 1993. The Cinema’s Third Machine: Writing on Film in Germany, 1907–1933. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Heidegger, M., 1977. The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays. Translated and Introduction by W. Lovitt. New York and London: Harper Colophon.
— 1991. Nietzsche. Volumes One and Two. Translated by D. Krell. San Francisco: HarperCollins.
Kittler, F.A., 1980. Austreibung des Geistes aus den Geisteswissenschaften. Paderborn: Ferdinand Schöningh.
— 1990. Discourse Networks 1800/1900. Translated by M. Metteer, with C. Cullens and Foreword by D.E. Wellbery. Standford: Standford University Press.
— 1997. Literature, Media, Information Systems: Essays, J. Johnston, ed. Amsterdam: G&B Arts International.
— 1999. Gramophone, Film, Typewriter. Translated and introduced by G. Winthrop-Young and M. Wutz. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
— 2006. ‘Number and Numeral’. Translated by G. Winthrop-Young, Theory, Culture & Society 23 (7–8): 51–61.
— 2010. Optical Media: Berlin Lectures 1999. Translated by A. Enns. Cambridge: Polity.
von König, D., 1977. ‘Lesesucht und Lesewut’. In H. G. Göpfert, ed. Buch und Leser: Vorträge des 1. Jahrtreffens des Wolfenbütteler Arbeitskreises für Geschichte des Buchswesen, 13. und 14. May 1976. Hamburg: Hauswedell Verlag, pp. 89–124.
Kracauer, S., 1987. ‘The Cult of Distraction: On Berlin’s Picture Palaces [1926]’. Translated by T. Y. Levin. New German Critique 40 (Winter): 91–6.
Kuhn, T., 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolution. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Littau, K., 2002. ‘Eye-Hunger: Physical Pleasure and Non-Narrative Cinema. In J. Arthurs and I.H. Grant, eds. Crash Cultures: modernity mediation and the material. Bristol: Intellect Books, pp. 3–51.
— 2005. ‘Lumière: Arrival of a Train at la Ciotat. Silent Cinema and Screaming Audiences’. In J. Geiger and R. L. Rutsky, eds. Film Analysis. A Norton Reader. New York: W. W. Norton, pp. 42–62.
— 2006. Theories of Reading. Books. Bodies and Bibliomania. Cambridge: Polity.
McLuhan, M., 1964. Understanding Media. The Extensions of Man. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
— 1969. Counterblast. London: Rapp and Whiting.
Nietzsche, F., (1967) ‘Zur Physiologie der Kunst [1888]’, In G. Colli and M. Montinari, eds. Kritische Gesamtausgabe, Vol. VIII, 3. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 327–8. Translated by D.F. Krell as ‘Toward the Physiology of Art’, in M. Heidegger (1991) Nietzsche Vols 1 and 2. San Francisco: HarperCollins, p. 94.
— (1968) The Will to Power [1887/1888]. Translated by W. Kaufmann and R. J. Hollingdale. New York: Vintage.
— 1981. ‘An Heinrich Köselitz in Venedig (Typoscript), [Genua,] Ende Februar 1882’, in G. Colli and M. Montinari, eds. Briefwechsel. Kritische Gesamtausgabe, vol. III.1: Briefe von Nietzsche: 1880–1884. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter.
Plato, 1921. Theaetetus. Sophist. Translated by H. N. Fowler. Cambridge Mass.: Harvard University Press.
— 1925. Statesman. Philebus. Ion , Vol. VIII of Plato (Loeb Classical Library, No. 164). Translated by H. Fowler and W. R. M. Lamb. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Poulet, G., 1980. ‘Criticism and the Experience of Interiority’. In Jane P. Tompkins, ed. Reader-Response Criticism. From Formalism to Post-Structuralism. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press, pp. 41–9.
Rees, E., 1913. ‘Rosalie Street and “The Pictures”’, The Manchester Guardian (26. 2. 1913), rpt. Guardian (9. 10. 1999).
Russell, B., 1953. Mysticism and Logic. London: Penguin.
Schlüpmann, H., 1990. Unheimlichkeit des Blicks. Das Drama des frühen deutschen Kinos. Frankfurt: Stroemfeld / Roter Stern.
Shand, A. I., 1879. ‘Contemporary Literature, VII: Readers’, Blackwood’s Magazine 126 (August): 235–56.
Simmel, G., 1997. ‘The Metropolis and Mental Life [1903]’. Translated by H. Gert in D. Frisby and M. Featherstone, eds. Simmel on Culture. London: Sage, pp. 174–85.
Warner, M., 2006. Phantasmagoria: Spirit Visions, Metaphors, and Media into the Twenty-first Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2011 Karin Littau
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Littau, K. (2011). The Ghost is the Machine: Media-Philosophy and Materialism. In: Carel, H., Tuck, G. (eds) New Takes in Film-Philosophy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230294851_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230294851_10
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-230-25029-1
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-29485-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave Media & Culture CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)