Skip to main content

The Ghost is the Machine: Media-Philosophy and Materialism

  • Chapter
Book cover New Takes in Film-Philosophy

Abstract

In A Midsummer Night’s Dream Shakespeare asks us to think about how the ‘imagination bodies forth / The forms of things unknown’ (V. i. 14–15). This line, in a play replete with fairies, asks us to consider the work of the imagination. How are we to imagine the imagination itself? Certainly, the way in which Shakespeare imagined his Oberon — King of the fairies, or his Titania — Queen of the fairies, or Puck, Peasebottom, Cobweb, Moth or Mustardseed, first took material shape on a page, on paper, penned, we presume, in ink. As the play says, ‘the poet’s pen / Turns them [the forms of things unknown] to shapes, and gives to airy nothing / A local habitation and a name’ (V. i. 15–17). With the help of a writing instrument, ‘airy nothing’ is turned into something. What was invisible becomes visible. What was immaterial becomes material. But is the pen just that: an instrument, a tool? Are the instruments we use to make art from the ‘airy nothing’ in our heads just that: tools which serve art?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aristotle., 1996. Physics. Translated by R. Waterfield. Introduction by D. Bostock. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Assmann, A., 2006. Einführung in die Kulturwissenschaft. Berlin: Erich Schmidt Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, A., 1874. ‘The Vice of Reading’, Temple Bar, XLII (September): 251–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Behne, A., 1978. ‘Die Stellung des Publikums zur modernen deutschen Literatur [1926]’. In A. Kaes, ed. Kino-Debatte. Texte zum Verhältnis von Literatur und Film 1909–1929. Tübingen: Max Niemayer, pp. 160–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin, W. 1973. ‘Theses on the Philosophy of History’, Illuminations. Translated by Harry Zohn. Bungay, Suffolk: Fontana, pp.255–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Böhme, H., 2000. ‘Himmel und Hölle als Gefühlsräume’, in C. Benthien, A. Fleig and I. Kasten., eds. Emotionalität. Zur Geschichte der Gefühle. Köln, Weimar, Wien: Böhlau Verlag, pp. 60–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butterworth, C. H., 1870. ‘Overfeeding’, Victoria Magazine 14 (November to April): 500–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Debray, R., 1996. Media Manifestos. Translated by E. Rauth. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butterworth, C. H 2000. Transmitting Cultures. Translated by E. Rauth. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J., 1979. Spurs / Eperons. Translated by B. Harlow. Chicago: Chicago University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Feather, J., 1988. A History of British Publishing. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hake, S., 1993. The Cinema’s Third Machine: Writing on Film in Germany, 1907–1933. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M., 1977. The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays. Translated and Introduction by W. Lovitt. New York and London: Harper Colophon.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1991. Nietzsche. Volumes One and Two. Translated by D. Krell. San Francisco: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kittler, F.A., 1980. Austreibung des Geistes aus den Geisteswissenschaften. Paderborn: Ferdinand Schöningh.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1990. Discourse Networks 1800/1900. Translated by M. Metteer, with C. Cullens and Foreword by D.E. Wellbery. Standford: Standford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1997. Literature, Media, Information Systems: Essays, J. Johnston, ed. Amsterdam: G&B Arts International.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1999. Gramophone, Film, Typewriter. Translated and introduced by G. Winthrop-Young and M. Wutz. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 2006. ‘Number and Numeral’. Translated by G. Winthrop-Young, Theory, Culture & Society 23 (7–8): 51–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 2010. Optical Media: Berlin Lectures 1999. Translated by A. Enns. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • von König, D., 1977. ‘Lesesucht und Lesewut’. In H. G. Göpfert, ed. Buch und Leser: Vorträge des 1. Jahrtreffens des Wolfenbütteler Arbeitskreises für Geschichte des Buchswesen, 13. und 14. May 1976. Hamburg: Hauswedell Verlag, pp. 89–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kracauer, S., 1987. ‘The Cult of Distraction: On Berlin’s Picture Palaces [1926]’. Translated by T. Y. Levin. New German Critique 40 (Winter): 91–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T., 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolution. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Littau, K., 2002. ‘Eye-Hunger: Physical Pleasure and Non-Narrative Cinema. In J. Arthurs and I.H. Grant, eds. Crash Cultures: modernity mediation and the material. Bristol: Intellect Books, pp. 3–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 2005. ‘Lumière: Arrival of a Train at la Ciotat. Silent Cinema and Screaming Audiences’. In J. Geiger and R. L. Rutsky, eds. Film Analysis. A Norton Reader. New York: W. W. Norton, pp. 42–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 2006. Theories of Reading. Books. Bodies and Bibliomania. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLuhan, M., 1964. Understanding Media. The Extensions of Man. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1969. Counterblast. London: Rapp and Whiting.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nietzsche, F., (1967) ‘Zur Physiologie der Kunst [1888]’, In G. Colli and M. Montinari, eds. Kritische Gesamtausgabe, Vol. VIII, 3. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 327–8. Translated by D.F. Krell as ‘Toward the Physiology of Art’, in M. Heidegger (1991) Nietzsche Vols 1 and 2. San Francisco: HarperCollins, p. 94.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (1968) The Will to Power [1887/1888]. Translated by W. Kaufmann and R. J. Hollingdale. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1981. ‘An Heinrich Köselitz in Venedig (Typoscript), [Genua,] Ende Februar 1882’, in G. Colli and M. Montinari, eds. Briefwechsel. Kritische Gesamtausgabe, vol. III.1: Briefe von Nietzsche: 1880–1884. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plato, 1921. Theaetetus. Sophist. Translated by H. N. Fowler. Cambridge Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1925. Statesman. Philebus. Ion , Vol. VIII of Plato (Loeb Classical Library, No. 164). Translated by H. Fowler and W. R. M. Lamb. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poulet, G., 1980. ‘Criticism and the Experience of Interiority’. In Jane P. Tompkins, ed. Reader-Response Criticism. From Formalism to Post-Structuralism. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press, pp. 41–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rees, E., 1913. ‘Rosalie Street and “The Pictures”’, The Manchester Guardian (26. 2. 1913), rpt. Guardian (9. 10. 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B., 1953. Mysticism and Logic. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlüpmann, H., 1990. Unheimlichkeit des Blicks. Das Drama des frühen deutschen Kinos. Frankfurt: Stroemfeld / Roter Stern.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shand, A. I., 1879. ‘Contemporary Literature, VII: Readers’, Blackwood’s Magazine 126 (August): 235–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmel, G., 1997. ‘The Metropolis and Mental Life [1903]’. Translated by H. Gert in D. Frisby and M. Featherstone, eds. Simmel on Culture. London: Sage, pp. 174–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warner, M., 2006. Phantasmagoria: Spirit Visions, Metaphors, and Media into the Twenty-first Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2011 Karin Littau

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Littau, K. (2011). The Ghost is the Machine: Media-Philosophy and Materialism. In: Carel, H., Tuck, G. (eds) New Takes in Film-Philosophy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230294851_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics