Skip to main content

Nations, Sovereignty, and Democratic Legitimacy: On the Boundaries of Political Communities

  • Chapter
After the Nation?

Part of the book series: International Political Theory Series ((IPoT))

  • 704 Accesses

Abstract

It is now quite widely acknowledged that the conventional modern Western conception of the polis — namely, liberal democracy embedded in a sovereign territorial state — faces powerful challenges. State autonomy is either eroded or inflected by increasing integration into international regimes, sub-state regionalization, capital mobility, the resurgence of minority nationalisms, and civil society networks, among other things. One must be careful not to blur the varying nature of those phenomena, to overestimate their impact on the state, or to underestimate the part played by states themselves in the internationalization of governance (see, for example, Wolf, 1999). Yet it seems indisputable that some diffusion of power actually characterizes the current era. This has led to significant debates on states as the primary locus of constitutional authority.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Arrhenius, G. (2005) ‘The Boundary Problem in Democratic Theory’ in F. Tersman (ed.) Democracy Unbound: Basic Explorations I (Stockholm: Filosofiska Insitutionen, Stockholm Universitet).

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry, B. (2001) Culture and Equality (Cambridge: Polity Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, S. (2004) ‘Democracy, Popular Sovereignty, and Constitutional Legitimacy’, Constellations, 11 (2), 153–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, R. (1970) After the Revolution? Authority in a Good Society (New Haven: Yale University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Justice, Canada (1982 [2009]) ‘Constitution Act, 1982’, http://laws.justice.gc.ca/eng/Const/ConstDoc.html [accessed 20 October 2009].

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodin, R. (2007) ‘Enfranchising All Affected Interests, and Its Alternatives’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 35 (1), 40–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Held, D. (2004) ‘Democratic Accountability and Political Effectiveness from a Cosmopolitan Perspective’, Government and Opposition, 39 (2), 364–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hont, I. (1994) ‘The Permanent Crisis of a Divided Mankind: “Contemporary Crisis of the Nation-State” in Historical Perspective’, Political Studies, XLII, 166–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalyvas, A. (2005) ‘Popular Sovereignty, Democracy, and the Constituent Power’, Constellations, 12 (2), 223–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keating, M. (2001) Plurinational Democracy: Stateless Nations in a Post-Sovereignty Era (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Keohane, R. O. and Nye, J. S. (2003) ‘Redefining Accountability for Global Governance’ in M. Kahler and D. A. Lake (eds) Governance in a Global Economy: Political Authority in Transition (Princeton: Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kymlicka, W. (2000) ‘Nation-Building: Comparing West and East’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 26 (2), 183–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kymlicka, W. and Straehle, C. (1999) ‘Cosmopolitanism, Nation-States, and Minority Nationalism: A Critical Review of Recent Literature’, European Journal of Philosophy, 7 (1), 65–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lajoie, A. (2004) ‘Les traités modernes au Québec et au Canada’, Les Cahiers du 27 juin, 2 (1), 49–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lecours, A. and Nootens, G. (2007) ‘Comprendre le nationalisme majoritaire’ in A.-G. Gagnon, A. Lecours, and G. Nootens (eds) Les nationalismes majoritaires contemporains. Identité, mémoire, pouvoir (Montréal: Québec Amérique).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindahl, H. (2001) ‘Sovereignty and the Institutionalization of Normative Order’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 21 (1), 165–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindahl, H. (2006) ‘Give and Take: Arendt and the Nomos of Political Community’, Philosophy and Social Criticism, 32 (7), 881–901.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacCormick, N. (1999) Questioning Sovereignty: Law, State, and Nation in the European Commonwealth (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Näsström, S. (2003) ‘What Globalization Overshadows’, Political Theory, 31 (6), 808–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nootens, G. (2006) ‘Liberal Nationalism and the Sovereign Territorial Ideal’, Nations and Nationalism, 12 (1), 35–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nootens, G. (2009) ‘Democracy and Legitimacy in Plurinational Societies’, Contemporary Political Theory, 8 (3), 276–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nootens, G. (2010) Le défi du cosmopolitisme. Souveraineté démocratique, justice et mondialisation (Montreal: Liber).

    Google Scholar 

  • Okin, S. M. (1999) ‘Is Multiculturalism Bad for Women?’ in J. Cohen, M. Howard, and M. Nussbaum (eds) Is Multiculturalism Bad for Women? (Princeton: Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pogge, T. (1997) ‘Creating Supra-National Institutions Democratically: Reflections on the European Union’s “Democratic Deficit”’, The Journal of Political Philosophy, 5 (2), 163–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Secrétariat aux affaires autochtones, Quebec (2004a) ‘Agreement-in-Principle of a General Nature’, http://www.versuntraite.com/documentation/telecharger_en.htm# [accessed 20 October 2009].

    Google Scholar 

  • Secrétariat aux affaires autochtones, Quebec (2004b) ‘Map of the Agreementin-Principle’, http://www.versuntraite.com/documentation/publications/411_en.pdf [accessed 20 October 2009].

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. (1992) ‘The Politics of Recognition’, in A. Gutmann (ed.) Multiculturalism: Examining the Politics of Recognition (Princeton: Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tierney, S. (2009) ‘CrystallisingDominance: MajorityNationalism, Constitutionalism and the Courts’ in A. Lecours and G. Nootens (eds) Dominant Nationalism, Dominant Ethnicity: Identity, Federalism and Democracy (Pieterlen, Switzerland: P. I. E Peter Lang).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tully, J. (1995) Strange Multiplicity: Constitutionalism in an Age of Diversity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (2007) ‘Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples’, http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/unpfii/en/drip.html [accessed 20 October 2009].

    Google Scholar 

  • Wendt, A. (1999) ‘A Comment on Held’s Cosmopolitanism’ in I. Shapiro and C. Hacker-Cordon (eds) Democracy’s Edges (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Whelan, F. G. (1983) ‘Democratic Theory and the Boundary Problem’ in J. R. Pennock and J. W. Chapman (eds) Nomos XXV: Liberal Democracy (New York: New York University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, K. D. (1999) ‘The New Raison d’État as a Problem for Democracy in World Society’, European Journal of International Relations, 5 (3), 333–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yack, B. (2001) ‘Popular Sovereignty and Nationalism’, Political Theory 29 (4), 517–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2010 Geneviève Nootens

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nootens, G. (2010). Nations, Sovereignty, and Democratic Legitimacy: On the Boundaries of Political Communities. In: Breen, K., O’Neill, S. (eds) After the Nation?. International Political Theory Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230293175_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics