Abstract
It is now quite widely acknowledged that the conventional modern Western conception of the polis — namely, liberal democracy embedded in a sovereign territorial state — faces powerful challenges. State autonomy is either eroded or inflected by increasing integration into international regimes, sub-state regionalization, capital mobility, the resurgence of minority nationalisms, and civil society networks, among other things. One must be careful not to blur the varying nature of those phenomena, to overestimate their impact on the state, or to underestimate the part played by states themselves in the internationalization of governance (see, for example, Wolf, 1999). Yet it seems indisputable that some diffusion of power actually characterizes the current era. This has led to significant debates on states as the primary locus of constitutional authority.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Arrhenius, G. (2005) ‘The Boundary Problem in Democratic Theory’ in F. Tersman (ed.) Democracy Unbound: Basic Explorations I (Stockholm: Filosofiska Insitutionen, Stockholm Universitet).
Barry, B. (2001) Culture and Equality (Cambridge: Polity Press).
Chambers, S. (2004) ‘Democracy, Popular Sovereignty, and Constitutional Legitimacy’, Constellations, 11 (2), 153–73.
Dahl, R. (1970) After the Revolution? Authority in a Good Society (New Haven: Yale University Press).
Department of Justice, Canada (1982 [2009]) ‘Constitution Act, 1982’, http://laws.justice.gc.ca/eng/Const/ConstDoc.html [accessed 20 October 2009].
Goodin, R. (2007) ‘Enfranchising All Affected Interests, and Its Alternatives’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 35 (1), 40–68.
Held, D. (2004) ‘Democratic Accountability and Political Effectiveness from a Cosmopolitan Perspective’, Government and Opposition, 39 (2), 364–91.
Hont, I. (1994) ‘The Permanent Crisis of a Divided Mankind: “Contemporary Crisis of the Nation-State” in Historical Perspective’, Political Studies, XLII, 166–231.
Kalyvas, A. (2005) ‘Popular Sovereignty, Democracy, and the Constituent Power’, Constellations, 12 (2), 223–37.
Keating, M. (2001) Plurinational Democracy: Stateless Nations in a Post-Sovereignty Era (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Keohane, R. O. and Nye, J. S. (2003) ‘Redefining Accountability for Global Governance’ in M. Kahler and D. A. Lake (eds) Governance in a Global Economy: Political Authority in Transition (Princeton: Princeton University Press).
Kymlicka, W. (2000) ‘Nation-Building: Comparing West and East’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 26 (2), 183–212.
Kymlicka, W. and Straehle, C. (1999) ‘Cosmopolitanism, Nation-States, and Minority Nationalism: A Critical Review of Recent Literature’, European Journal of Philosophy, 7 (1), 65–88.
Lajoie, A. (2004) ‘Les traités modernes au Québec et au Canada’, Les Cahiers du 27 juin, 2 (1), 49–53.
Lecours, A. and Nootens, G. (2007) ‘Comprendre le nationalisme majoritaire’ in A.-G. Gagnon, A. Lecours, and G. Nootens (eds) Les nationalismes majoritaires contemporains. Identité, mémoire, pouvoir (Montréal: Québec Amérique).
Lindahl, H. (2001) ‘Sovereignty and the Institutionalization of Normative Order’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 21 (1), 165–80.
Lindahl, H. (2006) ‘Give and Take: Arendt and the Nomos of Political Community’, Philosophy and Social Criticism, 32 (7), 881–901.
MacCormick, N. (1999) Questioning Sovereignty: Law, State, and Nation in the European Commonwealth (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Näsström, S. (2003) ‘What Globalization Overshadows’, Political Theory, 31 (6), 808–34.
Nootens, G. (2006) ‘Liberal Nationalism and the Sovereign Territorial Ideal’, Nations and Nationalism, 12 (1), 35–50.
Nootens, G. (2009) ‘Democracy and Legitimacy in Plurinational Societies’, Contemporary Political Theory, 8 (3), 276–94.
Nootens, G. (2010) Le défi du cosmopolitisme. Souveraineté démocratique, justice et mondialisation (Montreal: Liber).
Okin, S. M. (1999) ‘Is Multiculturalism Bad for Women?’ in J. Cohen, M. Howard, and M. Nussbaum (eds) Is Multiculturalism Bad for Women? (Princeton: Princeton University Press).
Pogge, T. (1997) ‘Creating Supra-National Institutions Democratically: Reflections on the European Union’s “Democratic Deficit”’, The Journal of Political Philosophy, 5 (2), 163–82.
Secrétariat aux affaires autochtones, Quebec (2004a) ‘Agreement-in-Principle of a General Nature’, http://www.versuntraite.com/documentation/telecharger_en.htm# [accessed 20 October 2009].
Secrétariat aux affaires autochtones, Quebec (2004b) ‘Map of the Agreementin-Principle’, http://www.versuntraite.com/documentation/publications/411_en.pdf [accessed 20 October 2009].
Taylor, C. (1992) ‘The Politics of Recognition’, in A. Gutmann (ed.) Multiculturalism: Examining the Politics of Recognition (Princeton: Princeton University Press).
Tierney, S. (2009) ‘CrystallisingDominance: MajorityNationalism, Constitutionalism and the Courts’ in A. Lecours and G. Nootens (eds) Dominant Nationalism, Dominant Ethnicity: Identity, Federalism and Democracy (Pieterlen, Switzerland: P. I. E Peter Lang).
Tully, J. (1995) Strange Multiplicity: Constitutionalism in an Age of Diversity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
United Nations (2007) ‘Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples’, http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/unpfii/en/drip.html [accessed 20 October 2009].
Wendt, A. (1999) ‘A Comment on Held’s Cosmopolitanism’ in I. Shapiro and C. Hacker-Cordon (eds) Democracy’s Edges (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Whelan, F. G. (1983) ‘Democratic Theory and the Boundary Problem’ in J. R. Pennock and J. W. Chapman (eds) Nomos XXV: Liberal Democracy (New York: New York University Press).
Wolf, K. D. (1999) ‘The New Raison d’État as a Problem for Democracy in World Society’, European Journal of International Relations, 5 (3), 333–63.
Yack, B. (2001) ‘Popular Sovereignty and Nationalism’, Political Theory 29 (4), 517–36.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2010 Geneviève Nootens
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Nootens, G. (2010). Nations, Sovereignty, and Democratic Legitimacy: On the Boundaries of Political Communities. In: Breen, K., O’Neill, S. (eds) After the Nation?. International Political Theory Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230293175_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230293175_11
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-36641-5
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-29317-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)