Skip to main content

Uttering Sentences Made Up of Words and Gestures

  • Chapter
Explicit Communication

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Pragmatics, Language and Cognition ((PSPLC))

Abstract

In several places, Robyn Carston warns the student of utterance interpretation against neglect of the ‘fact that most verbal utterances are a complex of linguistic, paralinguistic, facial and vocal gestures, which appear to function as a signal receiving a unified interpretation’, a fact which, she writes, remains ‘rather under-explored’ (2000: 824). Such neglect is unjustified because, she writes:

the domain of pragmatics is a natural class of environmental phenomena, that of ostensive (=communicative) stimuli; verbal utterances are the central case, but not the only one, and they themselves are frequently accompanied by other ostensive gestures of the face, hands, voice, etc, all of which have to be interpreted together if one is to correctly infer what is being communicated. (2002: 129)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abbott, B. (2005) ‘Some Notes on Quotation’. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 17: 13–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carston, R. (1999) ‘Review of Herbert Clark, Using Language’. Journal of Linguistics 35: 167–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carston, R. (2000) ‘Explicature and Semantics’. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 12: 1–44. Reprinted in S. Davis and B. Gillon (eds), 2004, Semantics: A Reader. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 817–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carston, R. (2002) ‘Linguistic Meaning, Communicated Meaning and Cognitive Pragmatics’. Mind and Language 17: 127–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, H.H. (1996) Using Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, H.H. (1997) ‘Dogmas of Understanding’. Discourse Processes 23: 567–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, H.H. (2003) ‘Pointing and Placing’. In S. Kita (ed.), Pointing. Where Language, Culture, and Cognition Meet. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 243–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, H.H. and Gerrig, R.J. (1990) ‘Quotations as Demonstrations’. Language 66: 764–805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, D. (1979) ‘Quotation’. Theory and Decision 11: 27–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Brabanter, P. (2005) ‘Quotations and the Intrusion of Non-linguistic Communication into Utterances’. In A. Dey et al. (eds), Modeling and Using Context: CONTEXT 2005, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, 3554. Berlin/ Heidelberg: Springer Verlag, pp. 126–39.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Horn, L. (1989) A Natural History of Negation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, S.C. (2004) ‘Deixis’. In L. Horn and G. Ward (eds), Handbook of Pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 97–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ludlow, P. (2005) ‘A Note on Alleged Cases of Nonsentential Assertion’. In R. Elugardo and R. Stainton (eds.), Ellipsis and Nonsentential Speech. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 95–108.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Melinger, A. and Levelt W.J.M. (2004) ‘Gesture and the Communicative Intention of the Speaker’. Gesture 4: 119–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merchant, J. (2004) ‘Fragments and Ellipsis’. Linguistics and Philosophy, 27: 661–738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Recanati, F. (2000) Oratio Obliqua, Oratio Recta: An Essay on Metarepresentation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, Bradford Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Recanati, F. (2001) ‘Open Quotation’. Mind 110: 637–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. (1986/95) Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, J. (2000) ‘Context and Logical Form’. Linguistics and Philosophy Stainton, R. (1995) ‘Non-sentential Assertions and Semantic Ellipsis’. Linguistics and Philosophy 18: 281–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stainton, R. (2005) ‘In Defense of Non-sentential Assertion’. In Z.G. Szabó (ed.), Semantics versus Pragmatics. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 383–457.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D. (2000) ‘Metarepresentation in Linguistic Communication’. In D. Sperber (ed.), Metarepresentations. A Multidisciplinary Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 411–48.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2010 Philippe De Brabanter

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Brabanter, P.D. (2010). Uttering Sentences Made Up of Words and Gestures. In: Soria, B., Romero, E. (eds) Explicit Communication. Palgrave Studies in Pragmatics, Language and Cognition. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230292352_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics