Arendt, H. (1958), The Human Condition ( Chicago: The University of Chicago Press).
Google Scholar
Bauman, Z. (2000), Liquid Modernity ( Cambridge: Polity).
Google Scholar
Bauman, Z. (2003), Liquid Love ( Cambridge: Polity Press).
Google Scholar
Bauman, Z. (2007), Liquid Times ( Cambridge: Polity Press).
Google Scholar
Buchholz, E. S. (1997), The Call of Solitude: Alonetime in a World of Attachment ( New York: Simon and Schuster).
Google Scholar
Castells, M., M. Fernandez-Ardevol, J. L. Qui, and A. Sey (2007), Mobile Communication and Society: A Global Perspective ( Cambridge: MIT Press).
Google Scholar
Cohen, J. (2002), Regulating Intimacy ( Princeton: Princeton University Press).
Google Scholar
Deresiewicz, W. (2009), “The End of Solitude,” The Chronicle of Higher Education, January 30, http://chronicle.com/article/The-End-of-Solitude/3708, accessed 18 January 2010.
Google Scholar
Dowrick, S. (1995), Intimacy and Solitude ( New York: W.W. Norton & Company).
Google Scholar
Glanville, B. (2008), “The Teacher Takes Legal Action Against Nude Photo Sacking,” AM: News and Current Affairs, ABC Radio, May 9, http://www.abc.net.au/pm/content/2008/s2240616.htm, accessed 5 October 2008.
Google Scholar
Giddens, A. (1992), The Transformation of Intimacy: Sexuality, Love, and Eroticism in Modern Societies ( Stanford: Stanford University Press).
Google Scholar
Gierveld, J. J. (1998), “A Review of Loneliness: Concepts and Definitions, Determinants and Consequences,” Review in Clinical Gerontology, vol. 8, 73–80.
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Gleick, J. (1999), Faster: The Acceleration of Just About Everything ( New York: Pantheon).
Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1989), Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere ( Boston: MIT Press).
Google Scholar
Heller, A. (1985), “The Dissatisfied Society,” in The Power of Shame ( London: Routledge and Kegan Paul ), 300–15.
Google Scholar
Honneth, A. (1995), The Struggle for Recognition: The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts ( Cambridge: Polity Press).
Google Scholar
Honneth, A. (2003), “Invisibility: On the Epistemology of ‘Recognition’,” Aristotelian Society Supplementary, vol. 75, no. 1, 111–26.
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Illouz, E. (2007), Cold Intimacies: The Making of Emotional Capitalism ( Cambridge: Polity Press).
Google Scholar
Illouz, E. (2008), Saving the Modern Soul (Berkeley: University of California Press).
Google Scholar
Inness, J. C. (1992), Privacy, Intimacy and Isolation ( New York: Oxford University Press).
Google Scholar
Johnson, S. (2009), “How Twitter Will Change The Way We Live,” Time, 15 June, 28.
Google Scholar
Markus, M. R. (1987), “Women, Success and Civil Society,” in S. Benhabib and D. Cornell (eds), Feminism as Critique ( Cambridge UK: Polity Press ), 96–109.
Google Scholar
Markus, M. R. (2001), “Decent Society and/or Civil Society,” Social Research, vol. 68, no. 4, 1011–30.
Google Scholar
Markus, M. R. 2010, “Lovers and Friends: ‘Radical Utopias’ of Intimacy?” Thesis Eleven, no. 101, 6–24.
CrossRef
Google Scholar
McCulloch, J. (2009), “Switching Off,” Sunday Life, 29 March, 15–16.
Google Scholar
Modersohn-Becker, P. (1998), Paula Modersohn-Becker: Letters and Journals, G. Busch and L. von Reinken (eds), ( Evanston: Northwestern University Press).
Google Scholar
Reiman, J. H. (1984), “Privacy, Intimacy, and Personhood,” in F. D. Schoeman (ed.), Philosophical Dimensions of Privacy ( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press ), 300–16.
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Rosa, H. (2003), “Social Acceleration: Ethical and Political Consequences of a De-Synchronized High-Speed Society,” Constellations, vol. 10, no. 1, 11–22.
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Rössler, B. (2005), The Value of Privacy ( Cambridge: Polity).
Google Scholar
Seligman, A. B. (1998), “Between Public and Private,” Society, vol. 35, no. 3, 30–6.
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Thompson, A. (2009), “What Price a Friend? Just 20 Cents on Facebook,” The Sun Herald, 13 December, 3.
Google Scholar
Wittel, A. (2001), “Toward a Network Sociality,” Theory, Culture & Society, vol. 18, no. 6, 51–76.
CrossRef
Google Scholar
Young, I. M. (1987), “Impartiality and the Civic Public,” in S. Benhabib and D. Cornell (eds), Feminism as Critique ( Cambridge UK: Polity Press ), 56–76.
Google Scholar