Abstract
The once unflinching stranglehold of Marxism and the Nuffield programme over class analysis is beginning to slacken, allowing room for a flowering of perspectives envisioning the concept in starkly contrasting ways (Wright, 2005). Yet, as already seen, there is one standpoint in this assortment currently enjoying particularly frequent adoption and discussion: that forwarded by Pierre Bourdieu. The appeal to Continental concepts, in large part motivated by the fact that they knit cultural processes into the very definition of class and thus resonate with the so-called ‘cultural turn’ gripping postmillennium sociology (see especially Devine and Savage, 2005), has no doubt been profitable. Theoretically it has laid bare the fallacies of the utilitarian model of agency employed by Goldthorpe and Wright by identifying the practical, pre-reflexive and dispositional nature of action flowing out of differentiated past social experiences and the inextricability of cultural frameworks and resources in the formation of ‘choices’ (see especially Devine, 1998; Savage, 2000), succeeded in reconnecting the analysis of class with broader trends in social and cultural theory (see, for instance, Skeggs, 2004; Adkins and Skeggs, 2004) and even facilitated reflection on the moral dimension of class, that is, its invidious role in dictating perceptions of self-worth (Sayer, 2002, 2005). Empirically it has granted a deeper exploration of the relational sense of identity, difference and similarity articulated by individuals (Savage, 2000; Savage et al., 2001), the experiential content of differing positions in the social order and, in particular, the denigration and dispossession pervading life in the lower sections (Skeggs, 1997; Charlesworth, 2000), the reproduction of inequality through differential possession of certain forms of capital and its manifestation in everyday life (Reay, 1998a; Devine, 2004; cf. Lareau, 2003) and the underlying dispositions and outlooks marking out differences and orienting action in certain locales (Savage et al., 2005b).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2010 Will Atkinson
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Atkinson, W. (2010). Conceptualizing Class and Reconceptualizing Reflexivity. In: Class, Individualization and Late Modernity. Identity Studies in the Social Sciences. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230290655_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230290655_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-31770-7
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-29065-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social Sciences CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)