Abstract
The previous chapters in this book have looked at current assumptions about the factors which might influence enterprise and entre-preneurship and the apparent inability of current models, based on those assumptions, to explain the poor results of much entrepreneurship policy. This chapter presents an alternative model in the hope that it might provide a better understanding leading to better policy. It does not, however, present a definitive conclusion because, while the case for a lot of current strategy appears to have been disprove, the case for this suggested alternative has not been proved. Indeed scientific method suggests that such theories can never be proved: only accepted as apparently workable until such time as they may eventually be disproved. So there can never be a final conclusion to such arguments and this model, having only just been advanced, has not yet been tested.
A long habit of not thinking something is WRONG, gives it a superficial appearance of being RIGHT, and raises at first a formidable outcry in defence of custom.
Thomas Paine in Common Sense
Doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results is insanity.
Attributed to Albert Einstein
The only question is how much resources the US will commit to its ‘war on drugs’ before trying something that works.
A newspaper comment on the US approach to its drug problem1
The UK government is committed to evidence- based policy but … often the available evidence base is only partial, and [it] can easily revert to ‘opinion-based’ policy.
Senior Researcher in Enterprise and Small Business, UK Department of Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform2
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
E. Howker, writing in the Independent, 9 March 2009.
Forum Report prepared by L. Stevenson, Pre-conference Policy Forum, 53rd Annual ICSB World Conference, Nova Scotia, Halifax, 2008.
C. Karlsson and M. Andersson, Entrepreneurship Policies: Principles, Problems and Opportunities, CISEG Working Paper No. 7 (Sweden: Jönköping International Business School, 2009).
I. Verheul, R. Thurik, S. Wennekers and A. Audretsch, ‘An Eclectic Theory of Entrepreneurship’, Timbergen Institute Discussion Paper TI 2001–03013, 2001.
C. Karlsson and M. Andersson, Entrepreneurship Policies: Principles, Problems and Opportunities, CISEG Working Paper No. 7 (Sweden: Jönköping International Business School, 2009).
Ibid.
N. N. Taleb, The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable (London: Allen Lane, 2007), p. vxii.
J. K. Galbraith in ‘The Concept of Conventional Wisdom’, the second chapter of The Affluent Society (Boston: Houghtom Mifflin, 1958), as quoted in S. Levitt and S. Dubner, Freakonomics (London: Penguin, 2006), pp. 89–90.
W. Bygrave, ‘The Entrepreneurial Paradigm (I): A Philosophical Look at Its Research Methodologies’, in Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, Vol. 14, No. 1, 1989.
Quoted in a television programme about Jared Diamond’s book, Guns, Germs and Steel (London: Jonathan Cape, 1997). The programme was broadcast on More 4 on 21 February 2009.
M. Minniti, W. Bygrave and E. Autio, Global Entrepreneurship Monitor: 2005 Executive Report, Babson College and London Business School.
S. Drakopoulou Dodd and A. Anderson, ‘Mumpsimus and the Mything of the Individualistic Entrepreneur’, International Small Business Journal, Vol. 25, No. 4, August 2007, p. 344.
Ibid., p. 352.
Said during her presentation in a seminar on ‘Fostering Enterprise’, organised by Invest Northern Ireland and held on 14 March 2007 at Narrow Water Castle, Warrenpoint.
From an article titled ‘Encouraging Youthful Enterprise’, in RSA Journal 1/6, 2002, p. 28.
W. Bolton and J. Thompson, Entrepreneurs: Talent, Temperament, Technique (Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann, 2000), p. 198.
D. Storey, in an e-mail communication about Greene et al., 21 January 2008.
D. Audretsch and M. Keilbach, ‘The Localization of Entrepreneurial Capital — Evidence from Germany’, Jena Economic Research Papers, at www.jenecom.de, 22 May 2010.
A. Gibb and J. Li, ‘Organising for Enterprise in China: What can We Learn from the Chinese Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprise Development Experience’, Futures 35, 2003, p. 403.
Based on comments made by Allan Gibb when making a presentation on his work in China on 20 April 2004.
See also A. Wooldridge, in an article titled ‘The More the Merrier’ in a special report on entrepreneurship in The Economist, 14 March 2009.
See, for instance, I. Ajzen, ‘Attitudes, Traits, and Actions: Dispositional Prediction of Behaviour in Personality and Social Psychology’, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 20, 1987, pp. 1–63.
N. Krueger and A. Carsrud, ‘Entrepreneurial Intentions: Applying the Theory of Planned Behaviour’, Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, Vol. 5, No. 4, 1993, p. 315.
N. Krueger, M. Reilly and A. Carsrud, ‘Competing Models of Entrepreneurial Intentions’, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 15, No. 2, 2000, p. 411.
Ibid., pp. 411–32.
Ibid., p. 412.
Ibid.
Copyright information
© 2010 Simon Bridge
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bridge, S. (2010). An Alternative Approach. In: Rethinking Enterprise Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230289833_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230289833_12
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-31398-3
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-28983-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave Business & Management CollectionBusiness and Management (R0)