Advertisement

Second Generation: Conflict Resolution Approaches to Ending Conflict

  • Oliver P. Richmond
Part of the Global Issues book series (GLOISS)

Abstract

This chapter examines the development of the theory and practice of conflict resolution, facilitation and transformation approaches, as well as some of the insights provided by peace research approaches, both as a response to the shortcomings of traditional diplomacy and as an independent approach to conflict. It examines their contribution to, and critique of, peacekeeping and peacemaking in the Westphalian environment. I have given such approaches the appellation of ‘second generation’ in order to indicate that they lead to a significantly different understanding of conflict and have created a profitable debate about making peace. They provide an important critique of approaches to ending conflict in the Westphalian system and point in a direction beyond that system. Thus, second generation conflict approaches take a radically different view of conflict; the assumption is made that conflicts can be (and ought to be) resolved rather than merely managed. Second generation approaches see difficulties in the way first generation approaches attempt to understand and address conflict and therefore propose to address the civil level of conflict, and the structural violence surrounding it. The resolution of conflict, it is argued, can therefore be viewed from a win-win perspective.

Keywords

Conflict Resolution Human Security Peace Process Structural Violence Peace Research 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Vivienne Jabri, ‘Agency, Structure, and the Question of Power in Conflict Resolution’, Paradigms, vol. 9, no. 2, winter 1995, p. 51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alan C. Tidwell, Conflict Resolved, London: Pinter, 1998, p. 30.Google Scholar
  3. 4.
    See David Mitrany, A Working Peace System, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1943Google Scholar
  4. Ernst B. Haas, The Uniting of Europe, Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1958.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Louis Kreisburg, ‘The Development of the Conflict Resolution Field’, in William Zartman and Lewis Rasmussen (eds), Peacemaking in International Conflict: Methods and Techniques, Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press, 1997, p. 56.Google Scholar
  6. 8.
    Johan Galtung, Peace by Peaceful Means’ Peace and Conflict, Development and Civilization, London: Sage, 1996, p. viii.Google Scholar
  7. 11.
    See Hugh Miall, Oliver Ramsbotham, and Tom Woodhouse, Contemporary Conflict Resolution, Cambridge: Polity Press, 1999, p.Google Scholar
  8. 12.
    Morton Deutsch, The Resolution of Conflict, Constructive and Destructive Processes, New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1973, p. 17.Google Scholar
  9. 13.
    E. A. Azar, ‘Protracted International Conflicts: Ten Propositions’, inj. Burton and E. A. Azar, International Conflict Resolution: Theory and Practice, Brighton: Wheatsheaf Books, 1986, p. 29.Google Scholar
  10. 14.
    H. Miall (ed.), The Peacemakers, Basingstoke: Macmillan — now Palgrave, 1992, pp. 234–7.Google Scholar
  11. 15.
    J. Burton and F. Dukes, Conflict: Practices in Management, Settlement and Resolution, Centre for Conflict Management and Resolution, Basingstoke: Macmillan — now Palgrave, 1990, p. 85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 16.
    J. Burton, Conflict and Communication, London: Macmillan — now Palgrave, 1969, p. 161.Google Scholar
  13. 46.
    R. Vayrynen, New Directions in Conflict Theory: Conflict Resolution and Conflict Transformation, London: Sage, 1991, pp. 4–6.Google Scholar
  14. 65.
    J. Burton, Conflict and Communication, London: Macmillan — now Palgrave, 1969.Google Scholar
  15. 66.
    See Leonard W. Doob (ed.), Resolving Conflict in Africa, New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1970Google Scholar
  16. Leonard W. Doob, Intervention: Guides and Perils, New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
  17. 73.
    Stephen P. Cohen and Edward E. Azar, ‘From War to Peace: The Transition between Egypt and Israel’, Journal of Conflict Resolution, vol. 25, no. 1., 1981, pp. 87–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 75.
    C. R. Mitchell, Peacemaking and the Consultant’s Role, Aldershot: Gower, 1981, pp. 8–13.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Oliver P. Richmond 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Oliver P. Richmond
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of International RelationsUniversity of St AndrewsUK

Personalised recommendations