Abstract
By September 1998 the Western integration of the East Central European countries, with the exception of Slovakia, was in principle a decided matter. Although Nato enlargement was more specified than EU enlargement in terms of the timing and conditions of accession, both enlargement processes had, in principle, become irrevocable. The velocity with which Western integration had occurred was breathtaking if one remembered 1989–90. The economic turmoil and hyperinflation in Poland in the early 1990s, for instance, suggested a Romanian or Bulgarian future as more likely for the decade to come than the path Poland eventually took. And although the Czech Republic and Hungary enjoyed more stable economic conditions, we must not forget that their average per capita income was equally small compared to that of the EU, and that the transformation from a command to a market economy was no easy ride for them, either. After the Second World War, it had taken ten to twelve years for Western Europe’s political economy and military security to settle. In this light the ten to twelve years that it took to extend the principles of Western integration eastwards after the watershed of 1989–90 do not seem extraordinarily long.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Joschka Fischer, ‘Die Schwerpunkte der deutschen Ratsprasidentschaft’, Bulletin, no. 2, 14 January 1999, pp. 9–12.
A point initially raised by Hans-Martin Jager, ‘Konstruktionsfehler des Konstruktivismus in den Internationalen Beziehungen’, Zeitschrift für Internationak Beziehungen, 3/2 (1996).
Gunther Hellmann, ‘Die Prekäre Macht. Deutsche Aullenpolitik an der Schwelle zum 21. Jahrhundert’, in Karl Kaiser and Wolf-Dieter Eberwein (eds), Deutschlands Neue Außenpolitik (Munich: Oldenbourg, 1998), vol. 4: Resourcen und Institutionen.
Simon Bulmer, Charlie Jeffery and William E. Paterson, ‘Deutschlands Europaische Diplomatie’, in Werner Weidenfeld (ed.), Deutsche Europapolitik. Optionen wirksamer Interessenvertretung (Bonn: Europa Union, 1998).
Joseph M. Grieco, ‘Anarchy and the limits of co- operation: a realist critique of the newest liberal institutionalism’, International Organisation, 42/3 (1988).
Hanns W. Maull, ‘Germany and Japan: the new Civilian Powers’, Foreign Affairs, 69/5 (1990).
Hanns W. Maull and Knut Kirste, ‘Zivilmacht und Rollentheorie’, Zeitschrift fur Internationale Beziehungen, 3/2 (1996).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2002 Henning Tewes
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tewes, H. (2002). Conclusion. In: Germany, Civilian Power and the New Europe. New Perspectives in German Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230289024_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230289024_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-42824-3
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-28902-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)