Advertisement

Divisia Monetary Aggregates for Taiwan

  • Yen Chrystal Shih

Abstract

Taiwan has implemented major financial liberalisation measures since the late 1980s. In July 1987, trade-related foreign exchange controls were abolished and capital-flow-related foreign exchange controls greatly relaxed. The entry of new securities firms was permitted in January 1988, with the result that the number of securities firms increased from 60 to 150 within the first year. The limit on daily fluctuations in stock prices was raised from 3 to 5 per cent in 1988 and to 7 per cent in the following year. In December 1990, foreign institutional investors were allowed to invest directly in the local stock market. In respect of the banking sector, a revised Banking Law was promulgated in September 1989, leading to bank interest rates on deposits and loans being completely liberalised, and new private commercial banks were allowed to be established. As of the end of 1993, sixteen new private banks had begun operating.

Keywords

Interest Rate Central Bank Money Demand Monetary Aggregate Treasury Bill 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barnett, William A. (1982) ‘The Optimal Level of Monetary Aggregation’, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, vol. 14, no. 4 (November), part 2, pp. 687–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barnett, William A. (1982) ‘Recent Monetary Policy and the Divisia Monetary Aggregates’, The American Statistician, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 165–72.Google Scholar
  3. Barnett, William, Edward Offenbacher and Paul Spindt (1981) ‘New Concepts of Aggregated Money’, The Journal of Finance, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 497–505.Google Scholar
  4. Barnett, William, Edward Offenbacher and Paul Spindt (1984). ‘New Divisia Monetary Aggregates’, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 92, no. 6, pp. 1047–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Belongia, Michael T. and James A. Chalfant (1989) ‘The Changing Empirical Definition of Money: Some Estimates from a Model of the Demand for Money Substitutes’, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 97, no. 2, pp. 387–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Belongia, Michael T. and K. Alec Chrystal (1991) ‘An Admissible Monetary Aggregate for the United Kingdom’, Review of Economics and Statistics, pp. 497–503.Google Scholar
  7. Chetty, V. K. (1969) ‘On Measuring the Nearness of Near-Moneys’, American Economic Review, vol. 59, pp. 226–9.Google Scholar
  8. Chou, Nan-Ting (1991) ‘An Alternative Monetary Policy Target: The New Benchmark Divisia Monetary Index’, Applied Economics, pp. 1699–75.Google Scholar
  9. Davidson, Russell and James G. MacKinnon (1981) ‘Several Tests for Model Specification in the Presence of Alternative Hypotheses’, Econometrica, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 781–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Farr, Helen T. and Deborah Johnson (1985) ‘Revisions in the Monetary Services (Divisia) Indexes of the Monetary Aggregates’, Staff Studies, Federal Reserve Board.Google Scholar
  11. Gauger, Jean and Harold A. Black (1991) ‘Asset Substitution and Monetary Volatility’, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 677–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ishida, Kazuhiko (1984). ‘Divisia Monetary Aggregates and Demand for Money: A Japanese Case’, Bank of Japan Monetary and Economic Studies, vol. 2, no. 1, (June), pp. 44–86.Google Scholar
  13. Laumas, G. S. (1968) ‘The Degree of Moneyness of Savings Deposits’, American Economic Review, pp. 501–3.Google Scholar
  14. Lee, T. H. (1966) ‘Substitutability of Non-Bank Intermediary Liabilities for Money: The Empirical Evidence’, Journal of Finance, vol. 21, pp. 441–57.Google Scholar
  15. Serletis, Apostolos and A. Leslie Robb (1986) ‘Divisia Aggregation and Substitutability among Monetary Assets’, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 430–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Serletis, Apostolos (1987) ‘Monetary Asset Separability Tests’, in William A. Barnett and Kenneth J. Singleton (eds), New Approaches to Monetary Economics Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Economic Theory and Econometrics, vol. 1, pp. 169–82 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  17. Swofford, James L. and Gerald A. Whitney (1987) ‘Nonparametric Tests of Utility Maximization and Weak Separability for Consumption, Leisure and Money’, The Review of Economics and Statistics, pp. 458–64.Google Scholar
  18. Timberlake, R. H. Jr and J. Fortson (1967) ‘Time Deposits in the Definition of Money’, American Economic Review, pp. 190–3.Google Scholar
  19. Varian, Hal R. (1983) ‘Non-parametric Tests of Consumer Behaviour’, Review of Economic Studies, pp. 99–110.Google Scholar
  20. Wenninger, John and Lawrence J. Radecki (1986) ‘Financial Transactions and the Demand for M1’, Federal Reserve Bank of New York Economic Review, no. 2, pp. 24–9.Google Scholar
  21. Whitney, Gerald A. and James L. Swofford (1986) ‘Flexible Functional Forms and the Utility Approach to the Demand for Money: A Non-parametric Analysis’, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 383–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Yue, Piyu and Robert Fluri (1991) ‘Divisia Monetary Services Indexes for Switzerland: Are They Useful for Monetary Targeting?’, Federal Reserve Bank of St Louis Review, September/October, pp. 19–33.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yen Chrystal Shih

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations