Do Cigarette Taxes Make Smokers Happier?
Economists have a well-established framework for understanding the welfare consequences of taxing goods that don’t create externalities. Taxes create dead-weight loss by causing consumers to distort their consumption away from their preferred choices. This cost is weighed against the benefits of government revenue. As established in the seminal analysis of Becker and Murphy (1988), this argument applies equally well to both addictive and nonaddictive goods. The same type of revealed preference arguments that suggest that taxes reduce the welfare of consumers of nonaddictive goods can be extended to “rational addicts”: agents decide to smoke by trading off the long-term costs of consumption against the immediate pleasures of consuming, all the while taking into account the addictive properties of the good in question. This model therefore suggests that the only justification for taxing addictive goods is the interpersonal externalities associated with consumption of those goods.
KeywordsGeneral Social Survey Income Quartile Linear Time Trend State Dummy General Social Survey Data
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Bernheim, Douglas and Antonio Rangel (2002) “Addiction, Cognition, and the Visceral Brain”, mimeo.Google Scholar
- Bertrand, Marianne and Sendhil Mullainathan (2001) “Do People Mean What they Say? Implications for Subjective Survey Data”, American Economic Review, 91(2).Google Scholar
- Bertrand, Marianne, Esther Duflo and Sendhil Mullainathan (2001) “How Much Should We Trust Differences in Differences?” mimeo.Google Scholar
- Blanchflower, D.G. and Oswald, A.J. (1996) “The Rising Well-Being of the Young”, paper presented at an NBER Conference on Disadvantaged Youth, North Carolina, December.Google Scholar
- Blanchflower, D.G. and Oswald, A.J. (2000) “Wellbeing Over Time in Britain and the USA”, mimeo, July, 2000.Google Scholar
- Chaloupka Frank J. and Kenneth Warner (2001) “The Economics of Smoking”, in Anthony Culyer and Joseph Newhouse (eds), Handbook of Health Economics, pp. 1539–628.Google Scholar
- Clark, A.E., “Unemployment as a Social Norm: Psychological Evidence from Panel Data”, Journal of Labor Economics, forthcoming.Google Scholar
- Easterlin, R. (1974) “Does Economic Growth Improve the Human Lot? Some Empirical Evidence”, in P.A. David and M.W. Reder (eds), Nations and Households in Economic Growth: Essays in Honour of Moses Abramowitz. New York and London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Ellwood, David and Mary Jo Bane (1985) “The Impact of AFDC on Family Structure and Living Arrangements”, in R. Ehrenberg (ed.), Research in Labor Economics.Google Scholar
- Gardner, Jonathan and Andrew Oswald (2001) “Does Money Buy Happiness? A Longitudinal Study Using Data on Windfalls”, mimeo.Google Scholar
- Gruber, Jonathan and Botond Koszegi (2002) “A Theory of Government Regulation of Addictive Bads: Optimal Tax Levels and Tax Incidence for Cigarette Taxation”, NBER Working Paper #8777.Google Scholar
- Gruber, Jonathan, Anindya Sen and Mark Stabile (2002) “Estimating Price Elasticities When There is Smuggling: The Sensitivity of Smoking to Price in Canada”, NBER Working Paper #8962.Google Scholar
- Kahneman, D. (1999) “Objective Happiness”, ch. 1 in Kahneman, D., Diener, E. and Schwarz, N. (eds), Well Being: the Foundations of Hedonic Psychology.Google Scholar
- Laibson, David (1997) “Golden Eggs and Hyperbolic Discounting”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 443–77.Google Scholar
- OECD (2002) OECD Health Data, 2001. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
- Schwarz, N. and Strack, F. (1999) “Reports of Subjective Well-Being: Judgmental Processes and Their Methodological Implications”, ch. 4 in Kahneman, D., Diener, E. and Schwarz, N. (eds), Well Being: the Foundations of Hedonic Psychology.Google Scholar