Skip to main content

Introduction

  • Chapter

Abstract

Neurology and literature are disciplines that initially appear to have little, if anything, to do with one another. The first is a so-called hard science practiced by a select coterie of medical doctors and researchers, while the second is a pleasurable artistic pursuit, theoretically open to all literate individuals. But first impressions can be deceptive. The present collection of essays aims to demonstrate that, in the late-nineteenth and early-twentieth centuries at least, brain science and imaginative fiction shared common philosophical concerns and rhetorical strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Anne Harrington, Medicine, Mind, and the Double Brain: A Study in Nineteenth-Century Thought (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1987), 40–5.

    Google Scholar 

  2. James Strachey, “Editor’s Introduction” to volume two of Sigmund Freud, The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, ed. James Strachey and Anna Freud, 24 vols (1955; London: Hogarth Press, 1981)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Peter Amacher, “Freud’s Neurological Education and its Influence on Psychoanalytic Theory”, Psychological Issues 4.4 (1965), 21–8.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Elaine Showalter, The Female Malady: Women, Madness, and English Culture, 1830–1980 (New York: Pantheon Books, 1985), 189–90.

    Google Scholar 

  5. See C.P. Snow, The Two Cultures and a Second Look (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1979)

    Google Scholar 

  6. F.R. Leavis, Two Cultures? The Significance of C.P. Snow (London: Chatto and Windus, 1962).

    Google Scholar 

  7. William James, Psychology (New York: Henry Holt, 1908), 3.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Stanley Finger, Origins of Neuroscience: A History of Explorations into Brain function (New York: Oxford University Press, 1994), 41.

    Google Scholar 

  9. On Ferrier’s highly public trial for animal cruelty and the negative press coverage of his research, see Laura Otis in this volume, as well as Richard French, Antivivisection and Medical Science in Victorian Society (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1975), 200–2

    Google Scholar 

  10. Coral Lansbury, The Old Brown Dog: Women, Workers and Vivisection in Edwardian England (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  11. The conceptual beginnings of what may be termed modern (as opposed to ancient or classical) neurology are open to debate. Etymologically, however, one can determine that Thomas Willis “coined the term neurologie in the 1660s; during the subsequent century it assumed its current form and by the 1830s had spawned the term neurologist to signify someone who made nerves his special subject of inquiry.” Janet Oppenheim, “Shattered Nerves”: Doctors, Patients, and Depression in Victorian England (New York: Oxford University Press, 1991), 28.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Robert Young, Mind, Brain, and Adaptation in the Nineteenth Century: Cerebral Localization and its Biological Context from Gall to Terrier (New York: Oxford University Press, 1990), xxii.

    Google Scholar 

  13. William Benjamin Carpenter, “On the Doctrine of Human Automatism: Part II”, Contemporary Review 25 (1875), 941.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ewald Hering, “Memory as a General Function of Organized Matter”, The Open Court, a Quarterly Magazine 1.6 (April 1887), IIB.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Marie Corelli, Ardath: The Story of a Dead Self (London: Methuen, 1907), 141.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Marie Corelli, Wormwood: A Drama of Paris (Chicago: M.A. Donohue, 1890), 14.

    Google Scholar 

  17. On Stoker’s Dracula as a reaction against late-Victorian neuroscientific developments, see Anne Stiles, “Cerebral Automatism, the Brain, and the Soul in Bram Stoker’s Dracula”, Journal of the History of the Neurosciences 15.2 (June 2006), 131–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bram Stoker, The Snake’s Pass (Dingle, Ireland: Brandon 1990), 59.

    Google Scholar 

  19. On the similarities between Jekyll and Hyde and late-Victorian case studies, see Anne Stiles, “Robert Louis Stevenson’s Jekyll and Hyde and the Double Brain”, Studies in English Literature, 1500–1900 46.4 (Autumn 2006), 879–900.

    Google Scholar 

  20. On the epistemological similarities between detective fiction and natural science, see Lawrence Frank, Victorian Detective Fiction and the Nature of Evidence: The Scientific Investigations of Poe, Dickens, and Doyle (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  21. Kelly Hurley, The Gothic Body: Sexuality, Materialism, and Degeneration at the fin de siècle (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1996), 5–6.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  22. Robert Mighall, A Geography of Victorian Gothic Fiction (New York: Oxford University Press, 1999), xxiv.

    Google Scholar 

  23. For examples of recent work in cognitive literary theory, see Alan Richardson and Ellen Spolsky, eds. The Work of Fiction: Cognition, Culture and Complexity (Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Alan Richardson, British Romanticism and the Science of the Mind (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2001), 12.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  25. Edwin Clarke and L.S. Jacyna, Nineteenth-Century Origins of Neuroscientific Concepts (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1987), 1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  26. See particularly Mark S. Micale, ed., The Mind of Modernism: Medicine, Psychology, and the Cultural Arts in Europe and America, 1880–1940 (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Laura Otis, Membranes: Metaphors of Invasion in Nineteenth-Century Literature, Science and Politics (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1999)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Rick Rylance, Victorian Psychology and British Culture, 1850–1880 (New York: Oxford University Press, 2000)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  29. Lilian R. Furst, Between Doctors and Patients: The Changing Balance of Power (Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 1998)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ian Hacking, Rewriting the Soul: Multiple Personality and the Sciences of Memory (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Laura Otis, ed., Literature and Science in the Nineteenth Century (New York: Oxford University Press, 2002)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Lilian R. Furst, ed., Medical Progress and Social Reality: A Reader in Nineteenth-Century Medicine and Literature (Albany: State University of New York Press, 2000)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Jenny Bourne Taylor and Sally Shuttleworth, eds, Embodied Selves: An Anthology of Psychological Texts, 1830–1890 (New York: Oxford University Press, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Unsigned review of Eugène Azam, “Double Consciousness with Periodic Loss of Memory (Amnesia)”, Mind 1.3 (July 1876), 414–6

    Google Scholar 

  35. Richard Proctor, “Dual Consciousness”, The Cornhill Magazine 35 (January 1877), 86–105.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Sigmund Freud, “Fräulein Elisabeth von R.” in Josef Breuer and Sigmund Freud, Studies on Hysteria, trans. and ed. James Strachey and Anna Freud (New York: Basic Books, 1957), 160.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Silas Weir Mitchell, Introduction to The Autobiography of a Quack and The Case of George Dedlow (New York: The Century, 1900), ix–x.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Robert Louis Stevenson, Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde, ed. Katherine Linehan (New York: Norton, 2003), 48.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Mark S. Micale, Approaching Hysteria: Disease and Its Interpretations (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995), 111.

    Google Scholar 

  40. George Frederick Drinka, The Birth of Neurosis: Myth, Malady, and the Victorians (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1984), 105.

    Google Scholar 

  41. George Beard, American Nervousness: Its Causes and Consequences (1881; New York: Arno Press, 1972), 9, 10.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Jan Goldstein, Console and Classify: The French Psychiatric Profession in the Nineteenth Century (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1987), 171.

    Google Scholar 

  43. For more information on pre-Freudian trauma theory, see also Ruth Leys, Trauma, A Genealogy (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  44. Mark S. Micale and Paul Lerner, eds, Traumatic Pasts: History, Psychiatry, and Trauma in the Modern Age, 1870–1930 (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Grant Allen, Physiological Aesthetics (London: Henry King, 1877), 98.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Mark S. Micale and Roy Porter, eds, Discovering the History of Psychiatry (New York: Oxford University Press, 1994), 25.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2007 Anne Stiles

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stiles, A. (2007). Introduction. In: Stiles, A. (eds) Neurology and Literature, 1860–1920. Palgrave Studies in Nineteenth-Century Writing and Culture. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230287884_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics