Abstract
It was not until the rise of cinema as common entertainment in the twentieth century that visual discourses clearly surpassed verbal ones as popular modes of representation. This shift in media did influence the efficacy of portraiture’s symbolic function but, as my earlier discussion of Virginia Woolf’s novel Orlando and Sally Potter’s cinematic adaptation demonstrates, the genre nevertheless continued to play a role in the articulation of gender- and desire-based subjectivities in not only fiction, but now also film. The sexual visuality articulated through the Victorian novel changed but it maintained its potency, with the mass visuality stimulated by the mainstreaming of cinema remaining heavily invested in the rhetoric and strategies found in Gothic and sensation fiction. According to Patricia White, common nineteenth-century Victorian literary forms had a considerable effect on cinematic renditions of gender and sexuality. Referencing ‘the familial and sentimental models’ as particularly strong pre-cinematic contexts for lesbian iteration specifically, White argues that ‘the inheritance of mid-century Hollywood films from nineteenth-century paradigms of women’s culture and relationality represents an articulation of new identities with older forms of female homosociality’.1
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Patricia White, Uninvited: Classical Hollywood Cinema and Lesbian Represent-ability (Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1999), p. xxii.
Peter Books, The Melodramatic Imagination: Balzac, Henry James, and the Mode of Excess (New York: Columbia University Press, 1985)
Simon Shepherd, ‘Pauses of Mutual Agitation’, Melodrama: Stage Picture Screen, eds Jacky Bratton, Jim Cook and Christine Gledhill (London: British Film Institute, 1994), pp. 25–37.
M. Meisel, ‘Scattered Chiaroscuro: Melodrama as a Matter of Seeing’, Melodrama: Stage Picture Screen, eds Jacky Bratton, Jim Cook and Christine Gladhill (London: British Film Institute, 1994), pp. 65–81: p. 75.
Nina Auerbach, Daphne du Maurier, Haunted Heiress (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2000), p. 135.
Daphne du Maurier, Rebecca (New York: Avon, 1971), p. 57.
Mary Ann Doane, The Desire to Desire: The Woman’s Film of the 1940s (Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1987), p. 125.
Ed Cohen, Talk on the Wilde Side: Toward a Genealogy of a Discourse on Male Sexualities (New York: Routledge, 1993), p. 13.
William Patrick Day, In the Circles of Fear and Desire: A Study of Gothic Fantasy (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1948), p. 19.
Alison Light, Forever England: Femininity, Literature and Conservatism Between the Wars (London: Routledge, 1991).
Daphne du Maurier, Gerald: A Portrait (London: Gollancz, 1934), p. 11.
Daphne du Maurier, Young George du Maurier (London: Peter Davis, 1951), p. ix.
Daphne du Maurier, Myself When Young — The Shaping of a Writer (London, Gollancz, 1977), p. 66.
Quoted in Margaret Forster, Daphne du Maurier (London: Chatto & Windus, 1993), p. 420.
Judith Halberstam, Female Masculinity (Durham: Duke University Press, 1998), p. 6.
Daphne du Maurier, The Infernal World of Branwell Brontë (Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin, 1960), p. 9.
Daphne du Maurier, The King’s General (London: Arrow Books, 1992), p. 282.
Daphne du Maurier, ‘Not after Midnight’, Don’t Look Now, and Other Stories (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1971), p. 56.
Rhona J. Berenstein, “I’m not the sort of person men marry”: Monsters, Queers, and Hitchcock’s Rebecca’, Out In Culture: Gay, Lesbian, and Queer Essays on Popular Culture, eds Corey K. Creekmur and Alexander Doty (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1995), pp. 239–61; p. 239.
Pat Califia, Sex Changes: The Politics of Transgenderism (San Francisco: Cleis, 1997), p. 2.
Teresa de Lauretis, Alice Doesn’t: Feminism, Semiotics, Cinema (Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1984), pp. 153–4.
Copyright information
© 2004 Dennis Denisoff
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Denisoff, D. (2004). Where the Boys Are: Daphne du Maurier and the Masculine Art of Unremarkability. In: Sexual Visuality from Literature to Film 1850–1950. Palgrave Studies in Nineteenth-Century Writing and Culture. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230287877_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230287877_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-51544-8
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-28787-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)