Skip to main content

“Uncovenanted Joys”: Catholicism, Sapphism, and Cambridge Ritualist Theory in Hope Mirrlees’ Madeleine: One of Love’s Jansenists

  • Chapter

Abstract

This essay examines how Hope Mirrlees, in her 1919 novel Madeleine: One of Love’s Jansenists, constructs a lesbian ancestry by drawing on Catholic as well as ancient Greek paradigms. Her configuration of these paradigms is conducted under the aegis of the theory of tragedy developed by her partner, classicist Jane Harrison, in collaboration with fellow Cambridge Ritualist Gilbert Murray. By writing the story of her lesbian protagonist Madeleine as tragedy with a capital T, Mirrlees dignifies the then-emerging narrative of the doomed homosexual. Although she does not use the words “lesbian,” “invert,” or even “Sapphist,” Mirrlees inscribes Sappho into her narrative as a central and ever-proliferating trope, thus also reinscribing into the classical and Christian past the homoeroticism which Harrison’s scholarship determinedly ignores.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Hope Mirrlees, The Counterplot (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1925), title page. This novel is dedicated to Jane Harrison.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Linda Dowling, Hellenism and Homosexuality in Victorian Oxford (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1993);

    Google Scholar 

  3. Richard Dellamora, Masculine Desire: the Sexual Politics of Victorian Aestheticism (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  4. For an outline, see Jane Harrison, Themis: a Study of the Social Origins of Greek Religion (1911; London: Merlin Press, 1963, rep. 1977), especially 331–63.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hope Mirrlees, Madeleine: One of Love’s Jansenists (London: W. Collins Sons & Co., 1919), 136, 138, 164. Variations of this phrase recur throughout the novel.

    Google Scholar 

  6. “Sublimation too was a strong current in the ethic and life-style of many homosexuals. A good many quietly anguished souls … followed an ethic of devotion, loyalty, romantic sentiment, and abstention from overt sexual acts.” Barbara Fassler, “Theories of Homosexuality as Sources of Bloomsbury’s Androgyny,” Signs 5 (1979), 249. See the case study of two women, reported by Havelock Ellis in Sexual Inversion: Studies in the Psychology of Sex (1897; Philadelphia: F. A. Davis, 1927). Vol. 2, 200, 221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sandra J. Peacock, Jane Ellen Harrison: the Mask and the Self (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1988), 111.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hope Mirrlees, Paris: a Poem (London: Hogarth, 1919), 21.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jessie Stewart, Jane Ellen Harrison: a Portrait from Letters (London: Merlin Press, 1959). ii.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2006 Ruth Vanita

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Vanita, R. (2006). “Uncovenanted Joys”: Catholicism, Sapphism, and Cambridge Ritualist Theory in Hope Mirrlees’ Madeleine: One of Love’s Jansenists. In: Gallagher, L., Roden, F.S., Smith, P.J. (eds) Catholic Figures, Queer Narratives. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230287778_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics