Abstract
This essay examines how Hope Mirrlees, in her 1919 novel Madeleine: One of Love’s Jansenists, constructs a lesbian ancestry by drawing on Catholic as well as ancient Greek paradigms. Her configuration of these paradigms is conducted under the aegis of the theory of tragedy developed by her partner, classicist Jane Harrison, in collaboration with fellow Cambridge Ritualist Gilbert Murray. By writing the story of her lesbian protagonist Madeleine as tragedy with a capital T, Mirrlees dignifies the then-emerging narrative of the doomed homosexual. Although she does not use the words “lesbian,” “invert,” or even “Sapphist,” Mirrlees inscribes Sappho into her narrative as a central and ever-proliferating trope, thus also reinscribing into the classical and Christian past the homoeroticism which Harrison’s scholarship determinedly ignores.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Hope Mirrlees, The Counterplot (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1925), title page. This novel is dedicated to Jane Harrison.
Linda Dowling, Hellenism and Homosexuality in Victorian Oxford (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1993);
Richard Dellamora, Masculine Desire: the Sexual Politics of Victorian Aestheticism (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1990).
For an outline, see Jane Harrison, Themis: a Study of the Social Origins of Greek Religion (1911; London: Merlin Press, 1963, rep. 1977), especially 331–63.
Hope Mirrlees, Madeleine: One of Love’s Jansenists (London: W. Collins Sons & Co., 1919), 136, 138, 164. Variations of this phrase recur throughout the novel.
“Sublimation too was a strong current in the ethic and life-style of many homosexuals. A good many quietly anguished souls … followed an ethic of devotion, loyalty, romantic sentiment, and abstention from overt sexual acts.” Barbara Fassler, “Theories of Homosexuality as Sources of Bloomsbury’s Androgyny,” Signs 5 (1979), 249. See the case study of two women, reported by Havelock Ellis in Sexual Inversion: Studies in the Psychology of Sex (1897; Philadelphia: F. A. Davis, 1927). Vol. 2, 200, 221.
Sandra J. Peacock, Jane Ellen Harrison: the Mask and the Self (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1988), 111.
Hope Mirrlees, Paris: a Poem (London: Hogarth, 1919), 21.
Jessie Stewart, Jane Ellen Harrison: a Portrait from Letters (London: Merlin Press, 1959). ii.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2006 Ruth Vanita
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Vanita, R. (2006). “Uncovenanted Joys”: Catholicism, Sapphism, and Cambridge Ritualist Theory in Hope Mirrlees’ Madeleine: One of Love’s Jansenists. In: Gallagher, L., Roden, F.S., Smith, P.J. (eds) Catholic Figures, Queer Narratives. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230287778_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230287778_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-28393-4
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-28777-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)