Advertisement

On the Roles of Turkic in the Caucasus Area

Chapter

Abstract

In this chapter I shall discuss briefly the roles of the Turkic varieties in the Caucasus area in order to illustrate some processes in historical contact linguistics. The term ‘Turkic’ will be used for ‘Turkic-speaking’, without any genetic or cultural implications. The general term ‘code’ refers to a language or a variety of a language. The following kinds of Turkic are found in the area today:

Azeri or Azerbaijanian (azeerbayĵanĵa) is mainly spoken in the Republic of Azerbaijan and in Iran, by at least 20 million people, and there is a sizeable Azeri-speaking population in the south-eastern part of Georgia. Scattered speaker groups are found in Armenia, Daghestan and Nakhichevan. The linguistic borderline between Azeri and Turkish runs through East Anatolia. For Azeri dialects, see Caferglu and Doerfer (1959: 281).

Kumyk (qumugča) is spoken by about 280,000 people north of the Azeri area, in the lowlands on the north-easternmost fringe of Daghestan. The area extends from Derbend in the south to Achi-Su in the north, close to the lower course of the Terek river. In the south, the area is confined to a narrow strip; the middle part is interrupted by a Dargi-speaking zone. Dialects include Boinaq, Khasavyurt and Khaidaq (Benzing, 1959: 392).

Keywords

Relative Clause Eleventh Century Primary Code Century Onward Vowel Harmony 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abaev, V. I. (1933) ‘Obščie elementy v jazyke osetin, balkarcev i karacaevicev’, Jazyk i myšlenie, vol. 1, pp. 71–89.Google Scholar
  2. Aikhenvald, A. Y. (2004) Evidentiality (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  3. Aikhenvald, A. Y. and R. M. W. Dixon (eds) (2003) Studies in Evidentiality, Typological Studies in Language, 54 (Amsterdam: John Benjamins).Google Scholar
  4. Akbaev, Č. X. (1963) Fonetika Dialektov Karačaevo-Balkarskogo Jazyka (Čerkessk: Karačaevo-Čerkesskoe Knižnoe Izdatel’stvo).Google Scholar
  5. Alekseev, M. E. and Ė. M. Šejxov (1997) Lezginskij jazyk (Moscow: Academia).Google Scholar
  6. Appaev, A. M. (1960) Dialekty Balkarskogo Jazyka v ix Otnošenii k Balkarskomu Literatur-nomu Jazyku (Nal’čik: Kabardino-Balkarskij Naučno-Issledovatel’skij Institut).Google Scholar
  7. Baskakov, N. A., P. A. Azimov, G. I. Donidze, S. K. Kenešbaev, L. A. Pokrovskaja, V. V. Rešetov, E. V. Sevortjan, E. R. Tenišev, E. I. Ubrjatova, M. J. Xamzaev, Š. Š. Širaliev, K. K. Judaxin (1966) Jazyki narodov SSSR 2 (Moscow: Nauka).Google Scholar
  8. Benzing, J. (1959) ‘Das Kumükische’, in Deny etal., Philologiae, pp. 391–406.Google Scholar
  9. Berta, Á. (1998) ‘West Kipchak Languages’, in L. Johanson and É. Á. Csató (eds), The Turkic Languages (London and New York: Routledge), pp. 301–17.Google Scholar
  10. Boeder, W. (2000) ‘Evidentiality in Georgian’, in Johanson and Utas (eds), Evidentials, pp. 275–328.Google Scholar
  11. Caferğlu, A. and G. Doerfer (1959) ‘Das Aserbeidschanische’, in Deny et al. (eds), Philologiae, pp. 280–307.Google Scholar
  12. Chrikba, V. (2003) ‘Evidential Category and Evidential Strategy in Abkhaz’, in Aikhenvald and Dixon, Studies in Evidentiality, pp. 243–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Christophe, B. (2004) Studier ide sydkaukasiske sprogs aspektologi, Acta humaniora, 190 (Oslo: University of Oslo, Faculty of Arts).Google Scholar
  14. Christophe, B. (2005) ‘Some Remarks on Postterminality and Evidentiality in South Caucasian’, in Dag Haug and Eirik Welo (eds), Haptacahaptaitis: Festschrift for Fridrik Thordarson (Oslo: The Institute for Comparative Research in Human Culture).Google Scholar
  15. Comrie, B. (1981) The Languages of the Soviet Union (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  16. Deny, J., K. GrØnbech, H. Scheel, Z. V. Togan and P. N. Boratav (eds) (1959) Philologiae turcicae fundamenta, vol. 1 (Wiesbaden: Steiner).Google Scholar
  17. Dmitriev, N. K. (1940) Grammatika kumykskogo jazyka (Moscow/Leningrad: Akademija nauk SSSR).Google Scholar
  18. Dmitriev, N. K. (1962) Stroj tjurkskix jazykov (Moscow: Izdatel’stvo vostočnoj literatury).Google Scholar
  19. Donabédian, A. (1996) ‘Pour une interprétation des différentes valeurs du médiatif en arménien occidental’, in Z. Guentchéva (ed.), L’énonciation médiatisée, Bibliothèque de l’infomation grammaticale, 35 (Louvain and Paris: Peeters), pp. 87–108.Google Scholar
  20. Džidalaev, N. N. (1990) Tjurkizmy v dagestanskix jazykov (Moscow: Nauka).Google Scholar
  21. Friedman, V. A. (2000) ‘Confirmative/non-confirmative in Balkan Slavic, Balkan Romance, and Albanian with Additional Observations on Turkish, Romani, Georgian and Lak’, in Johanson and Utas, Evidentials, pp. 329–66.Google Scholar
  22. Gadžieva, N. Z. (1979) Tjurkojazyčnye arealy Kavkaza (Moscow: Nauka).Google Scholar
  23. Gecadze, I. O. (1977) K lingvo-geografičeskomu obzory kavkazskogo jazykovogo areata. Areal’nye issledovanija v jazykoznanii i etnografli (Leningrad: Nauka).Google Scholar
  24. Geiger, B., T. Halasi-Kun, A. H. Kuipers, and K. H. Menges (1959) Peoples and Languages of the Caucasus. A Synopsis, Janua Linguarum, 6 (’s Gravenhage: Mouton and Co).Google Scholar
  25. Golden, P. B. (1992) An Introduction to the History of the Turkic Peoples. Ethnogenesis and State-formation in Medieval and Early Modern Eurasia and the Middle East, Turcologica, 9 (Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz).Google Scholar
  26. Golden, P. B. (1994) ‘Georgio-Turkica’, Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae, vol. 13, pp. 101–16.Google Scholar
  27. Golden, P. B. (1999) ‘The Nomadic Linguistic Impact on Pre-Činggizid Rus’ and Georgia’, Archivum Eurasiae Medii Aevi, vol. 10, pp. 72–97.Google Scholar
  28. Grjunberg, A. (1962) ‘K voprosu o jazykovom vzaimodejstvii (na materiale jazyka severoazerbajdžanskix tatov)’, Kratkie soobščenija Instituta Narodov Azii, vol. 40, pp. 11–23.Google Scholar
  29. Grjunberg, A. (1963) Jazyk severoazerbajžanskix tatov (Leningrad: Izdatel’stvo Akademii nauk SSSR).Google Scholar
  30. Gukasjan, V. L. (1973) Vzaimootnošenie Azerbajdžanskogo i Udinskogo Jazykov (Baku: Institut Jazykoznanija Akademii Nauk Azerbajdžanskoj SSR).Google Scholar
  31. Haspelmath, M. (1993) A Grammar of Lezgian, Mouton Grammar Library, 9 (Berlin/ New York: Mouton de Gruyter).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Harris, A. C. (1985) Diachronic Syntax: The Kartvelian Case, Syntax and Semantics, 18 (Orlando, Fla.: Academic Press).Google Scholar
  33. Johanson, L. (1971) Aspekt im Türkischen. Vorstudien zu einer Beschreibung des türkeitürkischen Aspektsystems, Studia Turcica Upsaliensia, 1 (Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell).Google Scholar
  34. Johanson, L. (1992) Strukturelle Faktoren in türkischen Sprachkontakten, Sitzungsberichte der Wissenschaftlichen Gesellschaft an der J. W. Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main, 29 (Stuttgart: Steiner).Google Scholar
  35. Johanson, L. (1996) ‘On Bulgarian and Turkic indirectives’, in N. Boretzky, W. Enninger and Th. Stolz (eds), Areale, Kontakte, Dialekte, Sprache und ihre Dynamik in mehrsprachigen Situationen, Bochum-Essener Beiträge zur Sprachwandelforschung, 24 (Bochum: Brockmeyer).Google Scholar
  36. Johanson, L. (2000a) ‘Turkic indirectives’, in Johanson and Utas, Evidentials, pp. 61–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Johanson, L. (2000b) ‘Linguistic convergence in the Volga area’, in D. Gilbers, J. Nerbonne and J. Schaeken (eds), Languages in Contact, Studies in Slavic and General Linguistics, 28 (Amsterdam and Atlanta: Rodopi), pp. 165–78.Google Scholar
  38. Johanson, L. (2000c) ‘Viewpoint operators in European languages’, in Ö. Dahl (ed.), Tense and aspect in the languages of Europe (Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter), pp. 27–187.Google Scholar
  39. Johanson, L. (2002) Structural Factors in Turkic Language Contacts (London: Curzon).Google Scholar
  40. Johanson, L. (2003) ‘Evidentiality in Turkic’, in Aikhenvald and Dixon, Studies in Evidentiality, pp. 273–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Johanson, L. (2004) ‘On the Turkic origin of Hungarian igen “yes”’, Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae, vol. 57, pp. 93–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Johanson, L. (2005) ‘Participles in Caucasus Turkic’, in Christophe, Festschrift Fridrik Thordarson.Google Scholar
  43. Johanson, L. and B. Utas (eds) (2000) Evidentials. Turkic, Iranian and Neighbouring Languages (Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter).Google Scholar
  44. Karakoç, B. (2005) Das finite Verbalsystem im Nogaischen, Turcologica, 58 (Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz).Google Scholar
  45. Kerimov, I. A. (1967) Očerki kumykskoj dialektologii (Maxačkala: Dagučpedgiz).Google Scholar
  46. Kozintseva, N. (2000) ‘Perfect forms as a means of expressing evidentiality in Modern Eastern Armenian’, in Johanson and Utas, Evidentials, pp. 411–17.Google Scholar
  47. Magomedov, A. G. (1966) ‘Kumykskij jazyk’, in Baskakov et al., Jazyki, pp. 194–212.Google Scholar
  48. Menges, K. H. (1959) ‘Die aralo-kaspische Gruppe’, in Deny etal., Philologiae, pp. 434–88.Google Scholar
  49. Menges, K. H. (1968) The Turkic Languages and Peoples. An Introduction to Turkic Studies, Ural-Altaische Bibliothek, 15 (Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz).Google Scholar
  50. Nasidze, I. and M. Stoneking (2001) ‘Mitochondrial DNA Variation and Language Replacements in the Caucasus’, Proceedings of the Royal Society, B 268 (London), pp. 1197–206.Google Scholar
  51. Nedjalkov, V. P. (2002) ‘Karachay-Balkar reciprocals’, Turkic Languages, vol. 6, pp. 19–80.Google Scholar
  52. Pakendorf, B. (2001) ‘Genetic and linguistic perspectives on the prehistory of the Yakuts’, Turkic Languages, vol. 5, pp. 138–43.Google Scholar
  53. Pritsak, O. (1959) ‘Das Karatschaische and Balkarische’, in Deny etal., Philôlogiae, pp. 340–68.Google Scholar
  54. Šagirov, A. K. (1989) Zaimstvovannaja leksika abxazo-adygskix jazykov (Moscow: Nauka).Google Scholar
  55. Siemeniec-Gołaś, E. (2000) Karachay-Balkar Vocabulary of Proto-Turkic Origin, Studia Turcologica Cracoviensia, 7 (Kraków: Ksiçgarna Akademicka).Google Scholar
  56. Stilo, D. (1994) ‘Phonological Systems in Contact in Iran and Transcaucasia’, in M. Marashi (ed.), Persian Studies in North America. Studies in Honor of Mohammad Ali Jazayery (Bethesda, Md: Iranbooks), pp. 75–94.Google Scholar
  57. Stilo, D. (2004) ‘Some Preliminary Thoughts on the Non-Persian Iranian Substratum of Azerbaijan’. Paper read at the conference ‘The Evolution of Turkic in Iran’, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, 17–19 December.Google Scholar
  58. Stilo, D. (2005) ‘Ambipositions as an Areal Response: The Case-study of the Iranian Zone’, in L. Johanson and C. Bulut (eds) Turkic-Iranian contact areas. Historical and linguistic aspects (Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz), pp. 297–320.Google Scholar
  59. Sumbatova, N. (1999) ‘Evidentiality, Transitivity and Split Ergativity’, in W. Abraham and L. Kulikov (eds), Tense-Aspect, Transitivity and Causativity (Amsterdam: John Benjamins), pp. 63–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wixmann, R. (1980) Language Aspects of Ethnic Patterns and processes in the North Caucasus. (Chicago: University of Chicago).Google Scholar
  61. Xabicev, M. A. (1966) ‘Karacaevo-balkarskij jazyk’, in N. A. Baskakov et al., Jazyki, pp. 213–33.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Lars Johanson 2006

Authors and Affiliations

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations