Advertisement

Structural Isoglosses between Khoekhoe and Tuu: The Cape as a Linguistic Area

Chapter

Abstract

In historical times, the wider Cape region, including the Orange River area, hosted languages of two very different Khoisan language families, namely of Tuu (specifically its !Ui branch) and Khoe (specifically its Khoekhoe branch). Khoekhoe displays a number of linguistic features that do not exist in the languages of its genealogical sister, the Kalahari branch of Khoe. A comparison beyond the limits of this family shows that the innovative structures in Khoekhoe often have a great similarity to properties of the Tuu family, particularly its !Ui branch. This observation leads to the hypothesis that the genuine linguistic character of Khoekhoe vis-à-vis Kalahari Khoe is to a considerable extent the result of contact with Tuu languages, which have been in the relevant area for a longer time. This chapter will (a) outline briefly the historical context of the contact situation; (b) identify commonalities of the two groups, with a particular focus on the assumed Tuu substrate interference in the morphosyntax of Khoekhoe; and (c) discuss a few implications of the data for the population history in southern Africa and for historical and contact linguistics in general.

Keywords

Noun Phrase Verb Phrase African Language Complex Predicate Feminine Gender 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Beach, Douglas M. (1938) The Phonetics of the Hottentot Language (Cambridge: Heffer).Google Scholar
  2. Besten, Hans den (2001) ‘The Complex Ancestry of the Afrikaans Associative Constructions’, in Carstens, Adelia and Heinrich Grebe (eds), Taallandskap: Huldigingsbundel vir Christo van Rensburg (Pretoria: J. L. Van Schaik), pp. 49–58.Google Scholar
  3. Besten, Hans den (2002) ‘Khoekhoe Syntax and its Implications for L2 Acquisition of Dutch and Afrikaans’, Journal of Germanic Linguistics, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 3–56.Google Scholar
  4. Bleek, Dorothea F. (1928–30) ‘Bushman Grammar: A Grammatical Sketch of the Language of the I xam-ka-!k’e’, Zeitschrift für Eingeborenen-Sprachen, vol. 19, pp. 81–98; vol. 20, pp. 161–74.Google Scholar
  5. Bleek, Dorothea F. (1936) ‘Special Speech of Animals and Moon Used by the 1 Xam Bushmen from Material Collected by Dr. W. H. I. Bleek and Miss L. C. Lloyd Between 1870 and 1880’, Bantu Studies, vol. 10, pp. 163–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bleek, Dorothea F. (1956) A Bushman Dictionary, American Oriental Series, 41 (New Haven, Conn.: American Oriental Society).Google Scholar
  7. Bleek, Wilhelm H. I. and Lucy C. Lloyd (1911) Specimens of Bushmen Folklore (London: George Allen).Google Scholar
  8. Boretzky, Norbert (1983) Kreolsprachen, Substrate, und Sprachwandel (Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz).Google Scholar
  9. Brenzinger, Matthias and Christa König (eds.) (forthcoming) Khoisan Languages and Linguistics: The Riezlem Symposium 2003, Quellen zur Khoisan-Forschung, 17 (Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe).Google Scholar
  10. Budack, K. F. R. (1986) ‘Die Klassifikation der Khwe-khwen (Naman) in Südwestafrika’, in Voßen, Rainer and Klaus Keuthmann (eds), Contemporary Studies on Khoisan, vol 1, Quellen zur Khoisan-Forschung, 5 (Hamburg: Helmut Buske), pp. 107–43.Google Scholar
  11. Dempwolff, Otto (1927) ‘Die Hervorhebung von Satzteilen als Anlass zur Verwendung besonderer Wortformen’, In Franz Boas, Otto Dempwolff, G. Panconcelli-Calzia, A. Werner and D. Westrmann (eds), Festschrift Meinhof (Glückstadt/Hamburg: J. J. Augustin), pp. 73–9.Google Scholar
  12. Dempwolff, Otto (1934/5) ‘Einführung in die Sprache der Nama-Hottentotten’, Zeitschrift für Eingeborenen-Sprachen vol. 25, pp. 30–66, 89–134, 188–229.Google Scholar
  13. Dickens, Patrick J. (n.d.) Ju/’hoan Grammar. Unpublished ms. (Windhoek: Nyae Nyae Development Foundation).Google Scholar
  14. Foley, William A. and Robert D. Van Valin (1984) Functional Syntax and Universal Grammar (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  15. Greenberg, Joseph H. (1963) The Languages of Africa (Bloomington, Ind.: Indiana University).Google Scholar
  16. Güldemann, Tom (1998) ‘The Kalahari Basin as an Object of Areal Typology: A First Approach’, in Schladt (ed.), 137–69.Google Scholar
  17. Güldemann, Tom (1999) ‘Head-initial Meets Head-final: Nominal Suffixes in Eastern and Southern Bantu from a Historical Perspective’, Studies in African Linguistics, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 49–91.Google Scholar
  18. Güldemann, Tom (2001) Quotative Constructions in African Languages: A Synchronic and Diachronic Survey. Habilitation thesis, Institut für Afrikanistik, University of Leipzig.Google Scholar
  19. Güldemann, Tom (2002) ‘Die Entlehnung pronominaler Elemente des Khoekhoe aus dem !Ui-Taa’, In Theda Schumann, Mechthild Reh, Roland Kiessling and Ludwig Gerhardt (eds), Aktuelle Forschungen zu afrikanischen Sprachen: Sprachwissenschaftliche Beiträge zum 14. Afrikanistentag, Hamburg, 11–14 October 2000 (Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe), pp. 43–61.Google Scholar
  20. Güldemann, Tom (2004a) ‘Reconstruction Through “de-construction”: The Marking of Person, Gender, and Number in the Khoe Family and Kwadi’, Diachronica, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 251–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Güldemann, Tom (2004b) ‘“Tuu”: A New Name for the Southern Khoisan Family’, in Tom Güldemann (ed.), Studies in Tuu (Southern Khoisan). University of Leipzig Papers on Africa, Languages and Literatures, 23 (Leipzig: Institut für Afrikanistik, University of Leipzig), pp. 2–9.Google Scholar
  22. Güldemann, Tom (forthcoming a) ‘Complex Pronominals in Tuu and Ju With Special Reference to Their Historical Significance’, Afrika und Übersee.Google Scholar
  23. Güldemann, Tom (forthcoming b) ‘Syntax: 1 Xam of Strandberg’, in Voßen (ed.), The Khoisan Languages.Google Scholar
  24. Güldemann, Tom (forthcoming c) ‘Phonology: Other Tuu Languages’, in Vossen (ed.), The Khoisan Languages.Google Scholar
  25. Güldemann, Tom (forthcoming d) ‘Greenberg’s “case” for Khoisan: The Morphological Evidence’, in Vossen, Rainer (ed.), Problems of linguistic-historical reconstruction in Africa, Sprache und Geschichte in Afrika, 19 (Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe).Google Scholar
  26. Güldemann, Tom (forthcoming e) ‘Person-gender-number Marking from ProtoKhoe-Kwadi to its Descendents: A Rejoinder With Particular Reference to Language Contact’, in König, Christa and Rainer Vossen (eds), Festschrift for Bernd Heine, Routledge African Linguistics Series (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
  27. Güldemann, Tom and Rainer Vossen (2000) ‘Khoisan’, in Bernd Heine and Derek Nurse (eds), African Languages: An Introduction (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 99–122.Google Scholar
  28. Güldemann, Tom and Edward D. Elderkin (forthcoming) ‘On External Genealogical Relationships of the Khoe Family’, in Brenzinger and König (eds), Khoisan Languages.Google Scholar
  29. Haacke, Wilfrid H. G. (1977) ‘The So-called “Personal Pronoun” in Nama’, in Anthony Traill (ed.), Khoisan Linguistic Studies 3, Communications 6. (Johannesburg: African Studies Institute, University of the Witwatersrand), pp. 43–62.Google Scholar
  30. Haacke, Wilfrid H. G. (1992) ‘Compound Noun Phrases in Nama’, in Derek F. Gowlett (ed.), African Linguistic Contributions (Presented in Honour of Ernst Westphal). (Pretoria: Via Afrika), pp. 189–94.Google Scholar
  31. Haacke, Wilfrid H. G. (1995) ‘Instances of Incorporation and Compounding in Khoekhoegowab (Nama/Damara)’, in Anthony Traill, Rainer Vossen and Megan Biesele (eds), The Complete Linguist: Papers in Memory of Patrick J. Dickens (Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe), pp. 339–61.Google Scholar
  32. Haacke, W., E. Eiseb, and L. Namaseb (1997) ‘Internal and External Relations of Khoekhoe Dialects: A Preliminary Survey’, in W. Haacke and E. D. Elderkin (eds), Namibian Languages: Reports and Papers (Namibian African Studies, vol. 4) (Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe), pp. 125–209.Google Scholar
  33. Haacke, Wilfrid H. G. (1999) The Tonology of Khoekhoe (Nama/Damara). Quellen zur Khoisan-Forschung, 16 (Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe).Google Scholar
  34. Hagman, Roy S. (1977) Nama Hottentot Grammar, Language Science Monographs, 15 (Bloomington, Ind.: Indiana University).Google Scholar
  35. Hahn, Theophilus (1870) ‘Beiträge zur Kunde der Hottentotten’, Jahresberichte des Vereins für Erdkunde zu Dresden 6/7, Anhang 1: 1–73.Google Scholar
  36. Heine, Bernd (1999) The //Ani: Grammatical Notes and Texts. Khoisan Forum, Working Papers 11 (Cologne: Institut für Afrikanistik, Universität zu Köln).Google Scholar
  37. Heine, Bernd (2000) ‘Grammaticalization Chains Across Languages: An Example from Khoisan’, In Spike Gildea (ed.), Reconstructing Grammar: Comparative Linguistics and Grammaticalization, Typological Studies in Language, 43 (Amsterdam: John Benjamins), pp. 177–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Jenkins T., H. C. Harpendi, H. Gordon, M. M. Keraan and S. Johnston (1971) ‘Redcell-enzyme Polymorphisms in the Khoisan Peoples of Southern Africa’, American Journal of Human Genetics, vol. 23, pp. 513–32.Google Scholar
  39. Kilian-Hatz, Christa and Bernd Heine (1998) ‘On nominal gender marking in Kxoe’, in Schladt (ed.), Language Identity, 65–93.Google Scholar
  40. Köhler, Oswin (1973/4) ‘Neuere Ergebnisse und Hypothesen der Sprachforschung in ihrer Bedeutung für die Geschichte Afrikas’, Paideuma, vol. 19/20, pp. 162–99. Lichtenberk, Frantisek (2000) ‘Inclusory pronominals’, Oceanic Linguistics, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 1–32.Google Scholar
  41. Maingard, Louis F. (1962) Korana Folktales (grammar and Texts) (Johannesburg: Witwatersrand University Press).Google Scholar
  42. Meinhof, Carl (1929) ‘Versuch einer grammatischen Skizze einer Buschmannsprache’, Zeitschrift für Eingeborenen-Sprachen, vol. 19, pp. 161–88.Google Scholar
  43. Meinhof, Carl (1930) ‘Der Koranadialekt des Hottentottischen’, Zeitschrift für Eingeborenen-Sprachen, vol 12 (Hamburg: Eckardt and Messtorff).Google Scholar
  44. Meriggi, Piero (1928/9) ‘Versuch einer Grammatik des 1 Xam-Buschmännischen’, Zeitschrift für Eingeborenen-Sprachen vol. 19, pp. 117–53, 188–205.Google Scholar
  45. Nurse, George T., A. B. Lane and Trefor Jenkins (1976) ‘Sero-genetic Studies on the Dama of South West Africa’, Annals of Human Biology, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 33–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Schapera, Isaac (1926) ‘A Preliminary Consideration of the Relationship Between the Hottentots and the Bushmen’, South African Journal of Science, vol. 23, pp. 833–66.Google Scholar
  47. Schladt, Mathias (ed.) (1998) ‘Language, Identity, and Conceptualization Among the Khoisan’, Quellen zur Khoisan-Forschung, 15 (Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe).Google Scholar
  48. Schultze, Leonhard (1907) Aus Namaland und Kalahari (Jena: Gustav Fischer).Google Scholar
  49. Schultze, Leonhard (1928) Zur Kenntnis des Körpers der Hottentotten und Buschmänner (Jena: Gustav Fischer).Google Scholar
  50. Soodyall, Himla and Trefor Jenkins (1992) ‘Mitochondrial DNA polymorphisms in Khoisan Populations from Southern Africa’, Annals of Human Genetics, vol. 56: 315–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Thomason, Sarah G. and Terrence Kaufman (1988) Language Contact, Creolization, and Genetic Linguistics (Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press).Google Scholar
  52. Traill, Anthony (1980) ‘Phonetic diversity in the Khoisan Languages’, in Jan W. Snyman (ed.), Bushman and Hottentot Linguistic Studies (Papers of Seminar Held on 27 July 1979), Miscellanea Congregalia 16 (Pretoria: University of South Africa), pp. 167–89.Google Scholar
  53. Traill, Anthony (1994) A !X65 dictionary, Quellen zur Khoisan-Forschung, 9 (Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe).Google Scholar
  54. Traill, Anthony (1997) Extinct: South African Khoisan languages (CD and booklet). (Johannesburg: Department of Linguistics, University of the Witwatersrand).Google Scholar
  55. Traill, Anthony and Rainer Vossen (1997) ‘Sound Change in the Khoisan Languages: New Data on Click Loss and Click Replacement’, Journal of African Languages and Linguistics, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 21–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Traill, Anthony and Hirosi Nakagawa (2000) ‘A Historical !X66–1 Gui Contact Zone: Linguistic and Other Relations’, in Herman M. Batibo and Joe Tsonope (eds), The State of Khoesan Languages in Botswana (Gaborone: Basarwa Languages Project), pp. 1–17.Google Scholar
  57. Vedder, Heinrich (1923) Die Bergdama, 2 vols. Hamburgische Universität, Abhand- lungen aus dem Gebiet der Auslandskunde 11/14 (Hamburg: L. Friederichsen).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Vedder, Heinrich (1934) Das alte Südwestafrika: Südwestafrikas Geschichte bis zum Tode Mahereros 1890 (Berlin: Mart in Warneck).Google Scholar
  59. Visser, Hessel (2003) ‘Nano Compounds’, in Brenzinger and König (eds), Khoisan Languages and Linguistics.Google Scholar
  60. Vossen, Rainer (1986) ‘Some Observations on Nominal Gender in Naro’, in Franz Rottland (ed.), Festschrift zum 60. Geburtstag von Carl F. Hoffmann, Bayreuther Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft, 7 (Hamburg: Helmut Buske), pp. 373–90.Google Scholar
  61. Vossen, Rainer (1997) Die Khoe-Sprachen: Ein Beitrag zur Erforschung der Sprachgeschichte Afrikas, Quellen zur Khoisan-Forschung, 12 (Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe).Google Scholar
  62. Vossen, Rainer (ed.) (forthcoming) The Khoisan languages (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
  63. Wallmann, J. C. (1857) Die Formenlehre der Namaquasprache: Ein Beitrag zur südafrika-nischen Linguistik (Berlin: Wilhelm Hertz).Google Scholar
  64. Webley, Lita (1998) ‘Tracing the emergence of a pastoralist identity in Namaqualand’, in Andrew Bank (ed.), The proceedings of The Khoisan Identities and Cultural Heritage Conference; Held At the South African Museum, Cape Town, 12–16 July 1997 (Cape Town: The Institute for Historical Research, University of the Western Cape and Infosource), pp. 80–6.Google Scholar
  65. Yates, Royden, Anthony Manhire and John Parkington (1994) ‘Rock Painting and History in the South-western Cape’, in Thomas A. Dowson and David Lewis-Williams (eds), Contested Images: Diversity in Southern African Rock Art Research (Johannesburg: Witwatersrand University Press), pp. 29–60.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Tom Güldemann 2006

Authors and Affiliations

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations