Advertisement

Linguistic Areas, Language Contact and Typology: Some Implications from the Case of Ethiopia as a Linguistic Area

Chapter

Abstract

The concept of linguistic area or Sprachbund has triggered many discussions among linguists dealing with language contact. Even though various suggestions for its exact definition and numerous papers dealing with the question of whether a certain geographic area really is a linguistic area have been published in the years since the introduction of that term by Trubetzkoy (1930) it still remains unclear what is in fact a linguistic area. As I would like to show in this chapter, this does not come as a surprise if one starts looking more closely at the problems inherent in this concept, which is based on an idealization that takes for granted too much of structural and social homogeneity across potential linguistic areas. In fact, almost all of the criteria discussed in the literature for a more clear-cut and homogeneous definition of what makes a linguistic area turn out to be either arbitrary or difficult to apply. In addition, the correlations between structural changes and their potential social and historical background seem to be of such a general and rather abstract nature that too much rigour in defining linguistic areas may obstruct the finding of potential regularities from the outset. It is for reasons like these that I shall introduce the concept of zones of contact-induced structural convergence (abbrevated to zones of convergence) as a more open concept comparable to geographic dialect continua (see section 3.3).

Keywords

Word Order Universal Grammar Structural Convergence Semitic Language Language Contact 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aikhenvald, A. Y. and R. M. W. Dixon (eds) (2001) ‘Introduction’, Areal Diffusion and Genetic Inheritance: Problems in Comparative Linguistics (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  2. Amborn, H., G. Minker, and H.-J. Sasse (1980) Das Dullay: Materialien zu einer ostku-schitischen Sprachgruppe (Berlin: Reimer).Google Scholar
  3. Appleyard, D. (1984) ‘The Internal Classification of the Agaw Languages: A Comparative and Historical Phonology’, in J. Bynon (ed.), Current Progress in Afro-Asiatic Linguistics: Papers of the Third International Hamito-Semitic Congress (Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins), pp. 33–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Appleyard, D. (1989) ‘The Relative Verb in Focus Constructions: An Ethiopian Areal Feature’, Journal of Semitic Studies, vol. 34, pp. 291–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Banti, G. (1988) ‘Adjectives in East Cushitic’, in M. Bechhaus-Gerst and F. Serzisko (eds) Papers from the International Symposium on Cushitic and Omotic Languages. Cologne, 6–9 January 1986 (Hamburg: Buske), pp. 205–59.Google Scholar
  6. Bender, M. L. (1979) ‘Gumuz: A Sketch of Grammar and Lexicon’, Afrika und Ubersee, vol. 62, pp. 38–69.Google Scholar
  7. Bisang, W. (1995) ‘Verb Serialization and Converbs: Differences and Similarities’, M. Haspelmath and E. König (eds), Converbs in Cross-linguistic Perspective (Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter), pp. 137–88.Google Scholar
  8. Bisang, W. (1996) ‘Areal Typology and Grammaticalization: Processes of Grammaticalization Based on Nouns and Verbs in East and Mainland South East Asian Languages’, Studies in Language, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 519–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bisang, W. (2001a) ‘Areality, Grammaticalization and Language Typology. On the Explanatory Power of Functional Criteria and the Status of Universal Grammar’, W. Bisang (ed.), Language Typology and Universals (Berlin: Akademie-Verlag).Google Scholar
  10. Bisang, W. (2001b) ‘Finite vs. Non Finite Languages’, M. Haspelmath, E. König, W. Österreicher and W. Raible (eds), Language Typology and Language Universals, Vol. 2 (Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter), pp. 1400–13.Google Scholar
  11. Bisang, W. (2004) ‘Dialectology and Typology–An Integrative Perspective’, B. Kortmann (ed.), Dialectology Meets Typology. Dialect Grammar from a Cross-linguistic Perspective (Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter), pp. 11–45.Google Scholar
  12. Campbell, L. (1994) ‘Grammar: Typological and Areal Issues’, in R. E. Asher and J. M. Y. Simpson (eds), The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, vol. 3 (Oxford: Pergamon Press), pp. 1471–4.Google Scholar
  13. Chomsky, N. (2002) On Nature and Language (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Crass, J. (2002) ‘Ejectives and Pharyngeal Fricatives: Two Features of the Ethiopian Language Area’, Baye Yimam, Richard Pankhurst, David Chapple, Yonas Admasu, Alula Pankhurst, and Birhanu Teferra (eds), Ethiopian Studies At the End of the Second Millennium, vol. III. Proceedings of the 14th International Conference of Ethiopian Studies, 6–11 November 2000, Addis Ababa (Addis Ababa: University Press), pp. 1679–91.Google Scholar
  15. Crass, J. and W. Bisang (2004) ‘Einige Bemerkungen zum äthiopischen Sprachbund und ihre Relevanz für die Areallinguistik’, in W. Bisang, Th. Bierschenk, D. Kreikenbom and U. Verhoeven (eds), Kultur, Sprache, Kontakt (Würzburg: Ergon).Google Scholar
  16. Crass, J., B. Dehnhard, R. Meyer and A. Wetter (2001) ‘Von “sagen” zum Verbbildungsmorphem: Die Grammatikalisierung des Verbs “sagen” einmal anders’, Afrikanistische Arbeitspapiere, vol. 65, pp. 129–41.Google Scholar
  17. Croft, W. A. (2001) Radical Construction Grammar. Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dahl, Ö. (2001) ‘Principles of Areal Typology’, M. Haspelmath, E. König, W. Österreicher and W. Raible, (eds), Language Typology and Language Universals, vol. 2 (Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter).Google Scholar
  19. Dimmendaal, G. J. (1998) ‘A Syntactic Typology of the Surmic Family from an Areal and Historical-Comparative Point of View’, in G. J. Dimmendaal, and Marco Last (eds), Surmic Languages and Cultures (Cologne: Kappe), pp. 35–81.Google Scholar
  20. Dolgopolsky, A. (1977) ‘Emphatic Consonants in Semitic’, Israel Oriental Studies, vol. 7, pp. 1–13.Google Scholar
  21. Dryer, M. (1992) ‘The Greenbergian Word Order Correlations’, Language, vol. 68, pp. 81–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ehret, Ch. (1978) ‘Omotic and the Subgrouping of the Afroasiatic Language Family’, R. L. Hess (ed.), Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Ethiopian Studies, Session B, 13–16 April 1978 (Chicago: University of Iblinois), pp. 51–62.Google Scholar
  23. Ehret, Ch. (1995) Reconstructing Proto-Afroasiatic (Proto-Afrasian): Vowels, Tone, Consonants, and Vocabulary (Berkeley, Calif., Calif.: University of California Press).Google Scholar
  24. Emeneau, M. (1956) ‘India as a Linguistic Area’; republished in A. S. Dil (ed.), Language and Linguistic Area: Essays by Murray B. Emeneau (Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1980), pp. 105–25.Google Scholar
  25. Emeneau, (1965) M. ‘India and Linguistic Areas’; reprinted in A. S. Dil (ed.), Language and Linguistic Area: Essays by Murray B. Emeneau (Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1980), pp. 126–66.Google Scholar
  26. Ferguson, C. A. (1970) ‘The Ethiopian Language Area’, Journal of Ethiopian Studies, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 67–80.Google Scholar
  27. Ferguson, C. A. (1976) ‘The Ethiopian Language Area’, M. L. Bender, J. D. Bowen, R. L. Cooper and C. A. Ferguson (eds), Language in Ethiopia (London: Oxford University Press), pp. 63–76.Google Scholar
  28. Fleming, H. and M. L. Bender (1976) ‘Non-Semitic Languages: Cushitic and Omotic’, J. D. Bowen, R. L. Cooper and C. A. Ferguson (eds), Language in Ethiopia (London: Oxford University Press), pp. 34–53.Google Scholar
  29. Greenberg, J. H. (1966) ‘Some Universals of Grammar With Particular Reference to the Order of Meaningful Elements’, J. H. Greenberg (ed.), Universals of Language (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press), pp. 73–113.Google Scholar
  30. Greenberg, J. H. (1959) ‘Africa as a Linguistic Area’, W. Bascom and R. Herskovits (eds), Continuity and Change in African Languages (Chicago: University of Chicago Press), pp. 15–27.Google Scholar
  31. Haarmann, H. (1976) Aspekte der Arealtypologie: Die Problematik der europäischen Sprachbünde (Tübingen: Narr).Google Scholar
  32. Haspelmath, Martin (1995) ‘The Converb as a Cross-linguistically Valid Category’, in M. Haspelmath and E. Konig (eds.), Converbs in Cross-linguistic Perspective. Structure and Meaning of Adverbial Verb Forms, Empirical Approaches to Language Typology, 13 (Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter), pp. 1–56.Google Scholar
  33. Haspelmath, M. and E. König (eds.) (1995) Converbs in Cross-linguistic Perspective. Structure and Meaning of Adverbial Verb Forms, Emperical Approaches to Language Typology, 13 (Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter).Google Scholar
  34. Hawkins, J. A. (1983) Word Order Universals (New York: Academic Press).Google Scholar
  35. Hawkins, J. A. (1994) A Performance Theory of Order and Constituency (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  36. Hetzron, R. (1975) ‘Genetic classification and Ethiopian semitic’, in J. Bynon and Th. Bynon (eds), Hamito-Semitica: Proceedings of a Colloquium Held by the Historical Section of the Linguistics Association (Great Britain) At the School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London, on the 18th, 19th and 20th of March 1970 (The Hague, Paris: Mouton), pp. 103–27.Google Scholar
  37. Hetzron, R. (ed.), (1997) The Semitic Languages (London, New York: Routledge).Google Scholar
  38. Hudson, G. (1989) Highland East Cushitic Dictionary, Kuschitische Sprachstudien 7 (Hamburg: Buske).Google Scholar
  39. Johanson, L. (1992) Strukturelle Faktoren in türkischen Sprachkontakten (Proceedings of the Wissenschaftlichen Gesellschaft an der J. W. Goethe-Universität Frankfurt a.M.). (Stuttgart: Steiner).Google Scholar
  40. Johanson, L. (2002) Structural factors in Turkic Language Contacts (London: Curzon).Google Scholar
  41. Kapeliuk, O. (1988) ‘Amharique’, in D. Cohen (ed.), Les langues chamito-sémitiques. Texte réuni par D. Cohen, Les langues dans le monde ancien et moderne, 3 (Paris), pp. 146–57.Google Scholar
  42. Katz, H. (1975) Generative Phonologie und phonologische Sprachbünde des Ostjakischen und Samojedischen (Munich: Fink).Google Scholar
  43. Keller, R. (1990) Sprachwandel (Tübingen: Francke).Google Scholar
  44. Keller, R. (1994) On Language Change: The Invisible Hand in Language (London: Routledge). (Translation and expansion of Sprachwandel).Google Scholar
  45. Koptjevskaja-Tamm, M. and B. Wälchli (2001) ‘The Circum-Baltic Languages: An Areal-Typological Approach’, Ö. Dahl and M. Koptjevskaja-Tamm (eds), Circum-Baltic Languages. Typology and Contact (Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins), pp. 615–750.Google Scholar
  46. Kristophson, J. (1993) ‘Ein neuer Beitrag zur Sprachbunddiskussion’, Zeitschrift für Balkanologie, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 1–11.Google Scholar
  47. Labov, W. (2001) Principles of Linguistic Change. Social Factors (Oxford: Blackwell).Google Scholar
  48. Lamberti, M. (1991) ‘Cushitic and its Classifications’, Anthropos, vol. 86, pp. 552–61.Google Scholar
  49. Leslau, W. (1945) ‘The Influence of Cushitic on the Semitic Languages of Ethiopia. A Problem of Substratum’, Word, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 59–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Leslau, W. (1952) ‘The Influence of Sidamo on the Ethiopic Languages of Gurage’, Language, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 63–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Leslau, W. (1969) ‘The Pseudo-Gerundive in Caha’, Rassegna di studi etiopici, vol. 23, pp. 27–42.Google Scholar
  52. Masica, C. P. (1976) Defining a Linguistic Area (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
  53. Maslova, E. (2000) ‘A Dynamic Approach to the Verification of Distributional Universals’, Linguistic Typology, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 307–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Matras, Y. (1998) ‘Utterance Modifiers and Universals of Grammatical Borrowing’, Linguistics, vol. 36, pp. 281–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Meyer, R. and R. Richter (2003) Language Use in Ethiopia from a Network Perspective (Frankfurt: Lang).Google Scholar
  56. Milroy, J. and L. Milroy (1985) ‘Linguistic Change, Social Network and Speaker Innovation’, Journal of Linguistics, vol. 21, pp. 339–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Nedjalkov, V. (1995) ‘Some Typological Parameters of Converbs’, M. Haspelmath and E. König. (eds), Converbs in Cross-linguistic Perspective (Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter), pp. 615–750.Google Scholar
  58. Orel, V. E. and O. V. Stolbova (1995) Hamito-Semitic Etymological Dictionary: Materials for a Reconstruction (Leiden: Brill).Google Scholar
  59. Praetorius, F. (1893) Zur Grammatik der Gallasprache (Berlin: Peiser); reprinted 1978 Hildesheim, New York: Olms.Google Scholar
  60. Sandfeld, Kr. (1930) Linguistique Balkanique, problèmes et résultats (Paris: Klincksieck).Google Scholar
  61. Sasse, H-J. (1973) ‘Spuren von Pharyngalen im Galab’, Afrika und Übersee, vol. 56, pp. 266–75.Google Scholar
  62. Sasse, H-J. (1979) ‘The Consonant Phonemes of Proto-East-Cushitic (PEC): A First Approximation’, Afroasiatic Linguistics, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–67.Google Scholar
  63. Schaller, H. (1975) Die Balkansprachen (Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag Winter).Google Scholar
  64. Sherzer, J. (1976) An Areal-Typological Study of American Indian Languages North of Mexico. (Amsterdam: North-Holland).Google Scholar
  65. Silva-Corvalân, C. (1994) Language Contact and Change: Spanish in Los Angeles (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
  66. Stolz, T. (1991) Sprachbund im Baltikum? Estnisch und Lettisch im Zentrum einer sprachlichen Konvergenzlandschaft (Bochum: Universitätsverlag Dr. Norbert Brockmeyer).Google Scholar
  67. Stolz, T. (2002) ‘No Sprachbund Beyond This Line! On the Age-Old Discussion of How to Define a Linguistic Area’, Ramat, P. and Stolz, T. (eds), Mediterranean Languages. Papers from the MEDTYP Workshop, Tirrenia, June 2000 (Bochum: Universitätsverlag Dr. Norbert Brockmeyer).Google Scholar
  68. Thomason, S. G. (2001) Language Contact: An Introduction (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Thomason, S. G. and T. Kaufman (1988) Language Contact, Creolization and Genetic Linguistics (Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press).Google Scholar
  70. Tosco, M. (1994a) ‘The Historical Syntax of East Cushitic: A First Sketch’, in T. Bearth, W. J. G. Mehlig, B. Sottas and E. Suter (eds), Perspektiven afrikanistischer Forschung: Beiträge zur Linguistik, Ethnologie, Geschichte, Philosophie und Literatur, X. Afrikanistentag (Cologne: Köppe), pp. 415–40.Google Scholar
  71. Tosco, M. (1994b) ‘On Case Marking in the Ethiopian Language Area’, in V. Brugnatelli, (ed.), Sem, Cam, lafet (Milano: Centro studi camito-semitici), pp. 225–44.Google Scholar
  72. Tosco, M. (1998) ‘A Parsing View on Inconsistent Word Order: Articles in Tigre and its Relatives’, Linguistic Typology, vol. 2, pp. 355–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Tosco, M. (2000) ‘Is There an ‘Ethiopian Language Area?’, Anthropological Linguistics, vol. 42, pp. 329–65.Google Scholar
  74. Trubetzkoy, N. S. (1930), ‘Proposition 16’, Actes du premier congrès international de linguistes à la Haye, du 10–15 avril 1928 (Leiden: A. W. Sijthoff), pp. 17–18.Google Scholar
  75. Wintschalek, W. (1993) Die Areallinguistik am Beispiel syntaktischer Übereinstimmungen im Wolga-Kama-Areal (Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz).Google Scholar
  76. Zaborski, A. (1991) ‘Ethiopian Language Subareas’, in S. Pilaszewicz and E. Rzewuski (ed.), Unwritten Testimonies of the African Past, Proceedings of the International Symposium held in Ojrzan6w n. Warsaw on 7–8 November 1989 (Warsaw: Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego), pp. 123–34.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Walter Bisang 2006

Authors and Affiliations

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations