Skip to main content

Inventing the Countryside: An Introduction

  • Chapter

Abstract

This book investigates the invention of the ‘countryside’ in England between the Game Act of 1671 and its repeal in 1831. For it was during this period of most controversial game legislation that ‘countryside’ ceased to refer to a specific side — east or west, north or south — of a piece of country, or a river valley, or a range of hills, and became ‘the countryside’, an imaginary, generalized space. Henceforth ‘countryside’ would connote not specific, local but aesthetic, global ‘natural unity’ (OED). ‘The countryside’ became a favorite word of descriptive writers.

How much English poetry depends upon English hunting this is not the place to enquire.

Virginia Woolf, ‘Jack Mytton’ (1926)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. See Barrell, The Idea of Landscape and the Sense of Place 1730–1840: An Approach to the Poetry of John Clare (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1972), pp. 1–3,

    Google Scholar 

  2. and Janowitz, England’s Ruins: Poetic Purpose and the National Landscape (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1990), pp. 3–4. Jeremy Burchardt makes a similar argument to mine, that ‘the concept of “the countryside” came into being’ when rural landscape began to be experienced as ‘an object of consumption, rather than as a means of production’, in Urban Perceptions and Rural Realities: Attitudes to the Countryside in England 1800–2000 (forthcoming 2001). My thanks to him for letting me read the book in manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  3. On the rivalry with France as a cultural solidifier of the English, Welsh, Scots and, most problematically, the Irish, see Linda Colley, Britons: Forging the Nation 1701–1837 (New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1992),

    Google Scholar 

  4. and Gerald Newman, The Rise of English Nationalism: A Cultural History, 1740–1830 (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Paul Langford, A Polite and Commercial People: England, 1727–1783 (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 1992), p. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Blackstone, Commentaries on the Laws of England (1765–69), 3: 326; quoted in Langford, Polite and Commercial People, p. 1. See also Robert Brenner, Merchants and Revolution: Commercial Change, Political Conflict, and London’s Overseas Traders, 1550–1653 (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1993);

    Google Scholar 

  7. and Peter Earle, The Making of the English Middle Class: Business, Society and Family Life in London, 1660–1730 (London: Methuen, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Paul Langford, Public Life and the Propertied Englishman, 1689–1798 (Oxford: Clarendon, 1991), p. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  9. For a summary of economic and social change during this period, see Gerald MacLean, Donna Landry, and Joseph P. Ward, ‘Introduction: The Country and the City Revisited, c. 1550–1850’, in MacLean, Landry, and Ward, eds, The Country and the City Revisited: England and the Politics of Culture, 1550–1850 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999), pp. 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  10. See also Peter Borsay, The English Urban Renaissance: Culture and Society in The Provincial Town 1660–1770 (Oxford: Clarendon, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Howard Newby, Country Life: A Social History of Rural England (London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1987), p. 34.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Roger B. Manning, Hunters and Poachers: A Cultural and Social History of Unlawful Hunting in England, 1485–1640 (Oxford: Clarendon, 1993), p. 17,

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. and J.M. Neeson, Commoners: Common Right, Enclosure and Social Change in England, 1700–1820 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993), pp. 40, 170.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. David Underdown, Revel, Riot, and Rebellion: Popular Politics and Culture in England 1603–1660 (Oxford: Clarendon, 1985), p. 160.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pope, An Essay on Man (1733–34), Maynard Mack, ed., vol. 3: 1 (1950), The Twickenham Edition of the Poems of Alexander Pope, gen. ed. John Butt, 11 vols (London: Methuen; New Haven: Yale University Press, 1939–69). All quotations from Pope’s poetry are from the Twickenham text. For convenience see John Butt, ed., The Poems of Alexander Pope: A One-Volume Edition of the Twickenham Text With Selected Annotations (London: Methuen, 1963).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Barrell, ‘The Public Prospect and the Private View: The Politics of Taste in Eighteenth-Century Britain’, in Simon Pugh, ed., Reading Landscape: Country-City-Capital (Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press, 1990), pp. 19–40; this passage p. 29.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bob Bushaway, By Rite: Custom, Ceremony and Community in England 1700–1880 (London: Junction Books, 1982), p. 82.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Thompson, Customs in Common (New York: The New Press, 1993), p. 98, n. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Thirsk, ed., The Agrarian History of England and Wales, Volume V.ii., 1640–1750: Agrarian Change (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985), p. 371.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Munsche, Gentlemen and Poachers: The English Game Laws 1671–1831 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981), p. 32.

    Google Scholar 

  21. On Whig versus Tory landscape aesthetics, see Nigel Everett, The Tory View of Landscape (New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  22. On nationally connected county gentry versus locally minded parish gentry, see Lawrence Stone and Jeanne C. Fawtier Stone, An Open Elite? England 1540–1880 (Oxford: Clarendon, 1984). On Gerrard Winstanley and the Diggers, see David Loewenstein, ‘Digger Writing and Rural Dissent in the English Revolution: Representing England as a Common Treasury’, in MacLean, Landry and Ward, eds, Country and City Revisited, pp. 74–88.

    Google Scholar 

  23. On Walpole’s use of the game laws for prosecuting political dissidents, see E.P. Thompson, Whigs and Hunters: The Origin of the Black Act (New York: Pantheon, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Stephen Deuchar, Sporting Art in Eighteenth-Century England: A Social and Political History (New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1988), p. 156. On the poaching wars and man traps, see Munsche, Gentlemen and Poachers, pp. 62–75.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Nigel Duckers and Huw Davies, A Place in the Country: Social Change in Rural England (London: Michael Joseph, 1990), p. 11.

    Google Scholar 

  26. On pre-eighteenth-century agrarian complaint, see James G. Turner, The Politics of Landscape: Rural Scenery and Society in English Poetry, 1630–1660 (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1978),

    Google Scholar 

  27. and Andrew McRae, God Speed the Plough: The Representation of Agrarian England, 1500–1660 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  28. On pre-eighteenth-century sympathy for hunted animals, see Keith Thomas, Man and the Natural World: A History of the Modern Sensibility (New York: Pantheon, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ritvo, The Animal Estate: The English and Other Creatures in the Victorian Age (London and New York: Penguin, 1990), p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  30. See Langford, Propertied Englishman, pp. 1–70, and Louis Althusser, ‘Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses (Notes towards an Investigation),’ in Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays, trans. Ben Brewster (New York and London: Monthly Review Press, 1971), pp. 127–86.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Joyce E. Salisbury, The Beast Within: Animals in the Middle Ages (New York and London: Routledge, 1994), p. 134.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Patterson, Fables of Power: Aesopian Writing and Political History (Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press, 1991), pp. 15–16.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  33. R. O[verton], Mans Mortallitie (Amsterdam, 1644); Erica Fudge, Perceiving Animals: Humans and Beasts in Early Modern English Culture (Houndmills and London: Macmillan and New York: St. Martin’s, 2000), pp. 153, 156.

    Google Scholar 

  34. On the doctrine of similitudes, which preceded Enlightenment taxonomies of species and so on, see Michel Foucault, The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences, Eng. trans. of Les Mots et les choses (1966) (New York: Vintage, 1973), pp. 17–45.

    Google Scholar 

  35. For example, Alexander Pope argued ‘Against Barbarity to Animals’, in The Guardian, No. 61, Thursday, 21 May 1713; Norman Ault, ed., The Prose Works of Alexander Pope: Vol. I. The Earlier Works, 1711–1720 (1936; rpt New York: Barnes & Noble, 1968), pp. 107–14. The clergyman James Granger offered remarkably similar arguments in An Apology for the Brute Creation, or Abuse of Animals censured; In a Sermon on Proverbs xii. 10. Preached in the Parish Church of Shiplake, in Oxfordshire, October 18, 1772 (London: Printed for T. Davies and Sold by W. Goldsmith, 1772). Moira Ferguson has worked most extensively on connections between anti-slavery and anti-cruelty movements; see ‘Breaking in Englishness: Black Beauty and the Politics of Gender, Race and Class’, Women: A Cultural Review 5: 1 (1994): 34–52, and Animal Advocacy and Englishwomen, 1780–1900: Patriots, Nation, and Empire (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  36. See John Lawrence, ‘On the Rights of Beasts’, A Philosophical And Practical Treatise On Horses and on the Moral Duties Of Man towards The Brute Creation (London: T. Longman, 1796), pp. 117–63. Animal rights are satirized in Thomas Taylor’s parodic A Vindication of the Rights of Brutes (1792); see Timothy Morton, Shelley and the Revolution in Taste: The Body and the Natural World (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994), pp. 30–3, and 13–56 for the wider context.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Coleridge, ‘To a Young Ass, Its Mother Being Tethered Near It’, in Ernest Hartley Coleridge, ed., Coleridge: Poetical Works (London: Oxford University Press, 1969), 11. 1, 26–8, and n., p. 75. David Perkins contextualizes the poem in ‘Compassion for Animals and Radical Politics: Coleridge’s “To a Young Ass”’, English Literary History 65: 4 (Winter 1998): 929–44. I disagree with his conclusion that Coleridge was only a half-hearted democrat, and that the ‘poem laughs apologetically at its own silliness’, p. 940. Coleridge anxiously feared reprisals against his Pantisocratic views, but that did not mean those views lacked conviction.

    Google Scholar 

  38. On the class-related aspects of anti-cruelty, see Robert W. Malcolmson, Popular Recreations in English Society 1700–1850 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1973), pp. 152–7 and 172–3; and Ritvo, Animal Estate, pp. 130–53.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Carr, English Fox Hunting, pp. 195–214, 246–56; and David C. Itzkowitz, Peculiar Privilege: A Social History of English Foxhunting 1753–1885 (Hassocks, Sussex: Harvester Press, 1977), pp. 135–50.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Allen, Enclosure and the Yeoman (Oxford: Clarendon, 1992), p. 21.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  41. Colin D.B. Ellis, Leicestershire and the Quorn Hunt (Leicester: Edgar Backus, 1951), pp. 14–15;

    Google Scholar 

  42. Eric Kerridge, The Agricultural Revolution (London: George Allen & Unwin, 1967), pp. 311–25; and Thirsk, ed., Agrarian History V.ii., pp. 577–8.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Elspeth Moncrieff with Stephen and Iona Joseph, Farm Animal Portraits (Woodbridge, Suffolk: Antique Collectors’ Club, 1996), pp. 231, 234–5.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Thirsk, ed., Agrarian History V.ii., pp. 577–8. On the early importation of ‘arabs, turks, and barbs’, see Peter Edwards, The Horse Trade of Tudor and Stuart England (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988), pp. 40–1.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  45. See, out of many possible sources, the chapters on thoroughbred lineages derived from the three foundation sires, the Darley Arabian, the Godolphin Arabian and the Byerley Turk, in Silk and Scarlet, by The Druid [H. H. Dixon] (London: Vinton, 1859; new edn 1895), pp. 156–242. The best scholarly study of horses in East-West relations is the chapter, ‘Managing the Infidel: Equestrian Art on its Mettle’, in Lisa Jardine and Jerry Brotton, Global Interests: Renaissance Art between East and West (London: Reaktion and Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2000), pp. 132–85. For ‘Orientalism’, see Edward W. Said, Orientalism: Western Conceptions of the Orient (1978; London and New York: Penguin, 1995), who does not discuss horse-breeding.

    Google Scholar 

  46. See, for example, David Levine, ed., Proletarianization and Family History (London and Orlando: Academic Press, 1984),

    Google Scholar 

  47. and, for a useful critique, Rab Houston and K.D.M. Snell, ‘Proto-Industrialization? Cottage Industry, Social Change, and Industrial Revolution’, The Historical Journal 27: 2 (1984): 473–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Wordie, ‘Introduction’, in C.W. Chalklin and J.R. Wordie, eds, Town and Countryside: The English Landowner in the National Economy, 1660–1860 (London: Unwin Hyman, 1989), pp. 1–25; this passage p. 19.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Bunce, The Countryside Ideal: Anglo-American Images of Landscape (London and New York: Routledge, 1994), p. 34.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Clare, [The Fens], in Eric Robinson and David Powell, eds, Oxford Authors: John Clare (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 1984), 11.77–84. Quotations from Clare’s verse will be from this edition unless otherwise noted.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Eric Robinson, ed., John Clare’s Autobiographical Writings (Oxford: Clarendon, 1983), pp. 9–10.

    Google Scholar 

  52. See reports in The Sporting Magazine of carted stag-hunting with George III’s hounds at Windsor, for example, for October 1796 in vol. 9 (1797), pp. 6–8. The Rothschilds still hunted carted stags at Waddesdon in Buckinghamshire in the early years of the twentieth century; Simon Blow, Fields Elysian: A Portrait of Hunting Society (London and Melbourne: J.M. Dent & Sons, 1983), p. 69.

    Google Scholar 

  53. W.G. Hoskins, The Making of the English Landscape (1955; London and New York: Penguin, 1985), p. 196.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Around 1830, the third horn or ‘leaping head’ was introduced, attributed to a Frenchman, Jules Charles Pellier, or to an Englishman, Thomas Oldaker. For Pellier, see Stephanie Grant, ‘Evolution of the Amazone in Life and Literature’, National Sporting Library Newsletter 7 (December 1978): 1–2, 4–5; this passage p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  55. For Oldaker, see Charles Chenevix Trench, A History of Horsemanship (Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1970), p. 277. On women’s relegation to spectators rather than participants in field sports, beginning in the late eighteenth century, see Munsche, Gentlemen and Poachers, pp. 38–9, 200, n. 64. I have analyzed the significance of the side-saddle extensively in a forthcoming manuscript, The Making of the English Hunting Seat.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Trollope, ed., British Sports and Pastimes (London: Virtue & Co., 1868), p. 74.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Hobsbawm and Ranger, eds, The Invention of Tradition (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983; Canto edn, 1992), p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  58. See C.E. Hare, The Language of Sport (London: Country Life, 1939), pp. 32–3, 39, 43, 117, n. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  59. David W. Macdonald, Fran H. Tattersall, Paul J. Johnson, Chris Carbone, Jonathan C. Reynolds, Jochen Langbein, Steve P. Rushton and Mark D.F. Shirley, Managing British Mammals: Case Studies from the Hunting Debate (Oxford: Wildlife Conservation Research Unit, 2000), pp. vi, x, 39, 46.

    Google Scholar 

  60. All quotations from Wordsworth’s poetry will be, unless otherwise stated, from Stephen Gill, ed., Oxford Authors: William Wordsworth (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  61. McKeon, ‘The Pastoral Revolution’, in Kevin Sharpe and Steven N. Zwicker, eds, Refiguring Revolutions: Aesthetics and Politics from the English Revolution to the Romantic Revolution (Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press, 1998), pp. 267–89; this passage p. 289.

    Google Scholar 

  62. De Bruyn A, ‘From Virgilian Georgic to Agricultural Science: An Instance in the Transvaluation of Literature in Eighteenth-Century Britain’, in Albert J. Rivero, ed., Augustan Subjects: Essays in Honor of Martin C. Battestin (Newark, DE and London: University of Delaware Press and Associated University Presses, 1997), pp. 47–67; this passage p. 53.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Laura Caroline Stevenson, Praise and Paradox: Merchants and Craftsmen in Elizabethan Popular Literature (Cambridge, 1984), pp. 16, 140–1.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  64. Margaret Grainger, ed., The Natural History Prose Writings of John Clare (Oxford: Clarendon, 1983), Appendix Va, ‘Volumes in Clare’s Library relating to Natural and Garden History’, p. 359.

    Google Scholar 

  65. James S. Ackerman, The Villa: Form and Ideology of Country Houses, A.W. Mellon Lectures in the Fine Arts, 1985; Bollingen Series 35: 34 (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1990), p. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Malcolm Andrews, The Search for the Picturesque: Landscape Aesthetics and Tourism in Britain, 1760–1800 (Aldershot: Scolar Press, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Tom Stephenson, Forbidden Land (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1989), p. 57.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Kathleen Coburn, ed., The Notebooks of Samuel Taylor Coleridge, in 3 vols (London: Routledge, 1957–73), 1 (Text): entry 760 (June–July 1800).

    Google Scholar 

  69. On the sexual politics of the picturesque, see Vivien Jones, ‘“The coquetry of nature”: Politics and the Picturesque in Women’s Fiction’, in Stephen Copley and Peter Garside, eds, The Politics of the Picturesque: Literature, Landscape, and Aesthetics since 1770 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994), pp. 120–44.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Liu, Wordsworth: The Sense of History (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1989), pp. 63–4.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Massingham, Remembrance: An Autobiography (London: Batsford, 1941), pp. 20–1.

    Google Scholar 

  72. On Massingham, see Patrick Wright, ‘An Encroachment Too Far’, in Anthony Barnett and Roger Scruton, eds, Town and Country (London: Jonathan Cape, 1998), pp. 18–33.

    Google Scholar 

  73. John Barrell, The Dark Side of the Landscape: The Rural Poor in English Painting 1730–1840 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980), p. 89.

    Google Scholar 

  74. See the episode described in Grainger, ed., Natural History Prose Writings, p. 234, and the fine essay by John Goodridge and Kelsey Thornton, ‘John Clare: The Trespasser’, in Hugh Haughton, Adam Phillips and Geoffrey Summerfield, eds, John Clare in Context (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994), pp. 87–129.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Eric Robinson and David Powell, eds, John Clare By Himself (Ashington, Northumberland and Manchester: Mid-NAG/Carcanet Press, 1996), pp. 83–4.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Steven N. Zwicker, Lines of Authority: Politics and English Literary Culture, 1649–1689 (Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 1993), pp. 72–3.

    Google Scholar 

  77. See Tom Williamson and Liz Bellamy, Property and Landscape: A Social History of Land Ownership and the English Countryside (London: George Philip, 1987), p. 205,

    Google Scholar 

  78. and Williamson, Polite Landscapes: Gardens and Society in Eighteenth-Century England (Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1995), pp. 131–2.

    Google Scholar 

  79. Rackham, The History of the Countryside (London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1995), pp. 26, 4–5. By contrast with the Planned, what Rackham calls the Ancient Countryside is the product of at least 1,000 years of continuity, and most of it has altered little since 1700. A country of hamlets and ancient isolated farms, ancient mixed irregular hedges, many footpaths, winding lanes and sunken drovers’ roads, many small woodlands and ponds and patches of heath, the Ancient, or anciently enclosed, Countryside contrasts strikingly with the ‘England of big villages, few, busy roads, thin hawthorn hedges, windswept brick farms, and ivied clumps of trees in corners of fields’, a ‘mass-produced, drawing-board landscape, hurriedly laid out parish by parish’, pp. 4–5.

    Google Scholar 

  80. Macdonald, Running with the Fox (New York and Oxford: Facts on File Publications, 1987), p. 173.

    Google Scholar 

  81. Sandra E. Baker and David W. Macdonald, ‘Foxes and Fox-hunting on Farms in Wiltshire: A Case Study’, Journal of Rural Studies 16 (2000): 185–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2001 Donna Landry

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Landry, D. (2001). Inventing the Countryside: An Introduction. In: The Invention of the Countryside. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230287570_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics