Advertisement

South Africa pp 233-264 | Cite as

The Shaping of a White Dominion

  • T. R. H. Davenport
  • Christopher Saunders

Abstract

When the Boer leaders met at Klerksdorp in April 1902 to consider making peace, they rallied to the exhortations of the ailing Steyn and proudly approached Kitchener with a peace offer which took their continued independence for granted. They would demilitarise the republics but asked for a treaty of friendship which would settle future economic relationships and political rights, and provide for the arbitration of disputes, equal language rights, and a mutual amnesty. Kitchener agreed to relay their offer to London, knowing that the British Government would not contemplate such a basis for talks. He insisted that the annexation was a fait accompli. They retorted that they had no authority to sign away their independence. But Kitchener allowed them facilities for convening a representative assembly of the people with plenipotentiary powers. The two Boer governments accordingly met again on 15 May at Vereeniging, in company with thirty delegates representing the commandos of each republic. These reported on the situation in their districts, which in many cases was critical. Those who still had cattle, grain and horses were generally prepared to fight on, and De Wet in particular, keeping faith with his diehard president, brushed aside obstacles in a rousing speech. But it was Botha and De la Rey who best represented the majority view, as they weighed logistic possibilities, and concluded that to continue a hopeless fight might well weaken their bargaining position in the long run.

Keywords

Proportional Representation Responsible Government Executive Council National Convention Legislative Council 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliographical Notes

9.1 The Treaty of Vereeniging, 31 May 1902

  1. De Wet (n. 8.10); Halperin V., Lord Milner and the Empire (1952);Google Scholar
  2. Hancock W. K., Four Studies in War and Peace in this Century (1961); and Smuts: The Sanguine Years (1962); and withGoogle Scholar
  3. Van der Poel J., The Smuts Papers I (1966) 511–36;Google Scholar
  4. Headlam C. (ed.), The Milner Papers 2 (1933) 324–66;Google Scholar
  5. Kestell J. D. and Van Velden D. E. (eds), The Peace Negotiations between Boer and Briton (1912); Le May (n. 8.9); Magnus (n. 8.10); Marais (n. 5.5);Google Scholar
  6. Worsfold W. B., Lord Milner’s Work in South Africa (1906).Google Scholar

9.2 The Cape and Natal in the post-war era

  1. Brookes and Webb (n. 6.4); Cuthbert P. ((M.A., Cape Town, 1950) [Jameson]; Davenport (n. 6.2); Duminy and Guest (n. 6.4); Lewsen (n. 6.8) and Merriman Correspondence (1966–9); and ‘J. X. Merriman as prime minister of the Cape Colony’, SAHJ 7 (1975) 62–87; Marks (n. 6.5); Thompson L. M., ‘The Colony of Natal and the Closer Union Movement’, BSALR (1957) 81–106; and (n. 9.10).Google Scholar

9.3 Milner and reconstruction

  1. Benyon (n. 8.1); Denoon D. J. N., A Grand Illusion: The Failure of Imperial Policy in the Transvaal Colony during the Period of Reconstruction, 1900–5 (1973); and ‘The Transvaal labour crisis, 1901–6’, JAH 7 (1967) 481–94; and ‘Capitalist influence and the Transvaal government during the crown colony period’, HJ 11 (1968) 301–31; and ‘Capital and capitalists in the Transvaal in the 1890s and 1900s’, HJ 23 (1980) 111–32; Duminy and Guest (n. 5.7);Google Scholar
  2. Gollin A. M., Proconsul in Politics: A Study of Lord Milner in Opposition and in Power (1964); Halperin (n. 9.1); Hancock (n. 8.9);Google Scholar
  3. Harris K. L., ‘Chinese merchants on the Rand, c. 1850–1910’, SAHJ 33 (1995) 155–68; Headlam (n. 9.1);Google Scholar
  4. Jeeves A. H., Migrant Labour in South Africa’s Mining Economy: The Struggle for the Gold Mines’ Labour Supply, 1890–1920 (1985) and (n. 5.7);Google Scholar
  5. Katz E., A Trade Union Aristocracy (1976); Katzenellenbogen S. E., ‘Reconstruction in the Transvaal’, in *Warwick; Kubicek (n. 5.7); Mawby (n. 9.8);Google Scholar
  6. Marks S. and Trapido S., ‘Lord Milner and the South African state’, HW 8 (1979) 50–80;Google Scholar
  7. Newton A. P., Select Documents on the Unification of South Africa (2 vols, 1924);Google Scholar
  8. Nimocks W., Milner’s Young Men: The ‘Kindergarten’ in Edwardian Imperial Affairs (1970);Google Scholar
  9. Richardson P., Chinese Mine Labour in the Transvaal (1982); Stokes E., ‘Milnerism’, HJ 5, 1 (1962);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Streak M., Lord Milner’s Immigration Policy for the Transvaal, 1897–1905 (1969);Google Scholar
  11. Synge B., The Story of the World (5 vols, 1903);Google Scholar
  12. Van Onselen C., Studies in the Social and Economic History of the Witwatersrand, 1886–1914 (2 vols, 1982).Google Scholar

9.4 The Milner regime and South African blacks: the Lagden Commission, segregation and the Zulu rebellion of 1906

  1. *Beinart and Dubow (1995); Beinart W. J. and Bundy C., Hidden Struggles in Rural South Africa: Politics and Popular Movements in the Transkei and Eastern Cape. 1890–1930 (1987);Google Scholar
  2. Carton B., Blood from your children: African Generational conflict in South Africa (1999);Google Scholar
  3. Cell J. W., The Highest Stage of White Supremacy: The Origins of Segregation in South Africa and the American South (1982); Davenport (n. 20.5);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dubow S., Racial Segregation and the Origins of Apartheid in South Africa (1989); and Scientific Racism in Modern South Africa (1995);Google Scholar
  5. Evans M. S., Black and White in South East Africa: A Study in Sociology (1911);Google Scholar
  6. Fredrickson G. M., White Supremacy: A Comparative Study in American and South African History (1981); Jeeves (n. 19.3); Karis and Carter I (1972) (n. 6.3); Keegan (n. 19.3); Legassick M., ‘The making of modern South African “native policy”, 1903–23: the origins of segregation’, in *Beinart and Dubow; Marks (n. 6.5); Maylam (n. 4.1); Odendaal (n. 6.3);Google Scholar
  7. Stuart J. A History of the Zulu Rebellion, and Dinuzulu’s Arrest, Trial and Expatriation (1971); Walker (n. 6.2); Welsh (n. 6.5).Google Scholar

9.5 Independent churches and the growth of African and Coloured political movements

  1. Adhikari M., (n. 9.11) and ‘Responses to marginality: 20th century Coloured politics’, SAHJ 20 (1988) 115–25; Campbell J., Songs of Zion: the American Methodist Episcopal Church in the United States and South Africa (1995);Google Scholar
  2. Flournoy B. M., ‘The relationship of the American Methodist Church to its South African members’, JAS 2 (1975) 529–45;Google Scholar
  3. Lewis G. L. M., Between the Wire and the Wall: A History of South African ‘Coloured’ Politics (1987);Google Scholar
  4. Mills W. G., ‘The Taylor revival of 1866, and roots of African nationalism in the Cape Colony’ JRel.A 8 (1976) 105–22; ‘The fork in the road: religious separatism and African nationalism in the Cape Colony, 1890–1910’, JRel.A 9 (1978) 50–9, and with Saunders C. C., 189–210; Odendaal (n. 6.3); Pretorius H. and Jafta L., ‘African independent churches’, in *Elphick and Davenport 211–26; Saunders C. C., ‘Nehemiah Tile and the Thembu church’, JAH 11 (1970)…; and ‘The new African elites in the eastern Cape: some late 19th century origins of African nationalism’, ICS 1 (1970) 44–55;Google Scholar
  5. Sundkler B. G. M., Bantu Prophets in South Africa (1961); and Zulu Zion (1976);Google Scholar
  6. Whisson M. G. and West M. (eds), Religion and Social Change in Southern Africa (1975); Wilson M. (n. 7.10).Google Scholar

9.6 Gandhi

  1. See references in nn. 6.7 and 13.7, and Bhana S., ‘M. H. Nazaar, Gandhi and the Indian Opinion’, Hist. 23 (1978) 56–62, and withGoogle Scholar
  2. Pachai B., A Documentary History of Indian South Africans (1984),Google Scholar
  3. and with Mesthrie U., ‘Passive resistance among Indian South Africans’, SAHJ 16 (1984) 118–31;Google Scholar
  4. Brown J. M., Gandhi, Prisoner of Hope (1989), and in *Brown and Prozesky 1–7, 21–34, 111–28, and in SAHJ 29 (1993) 229–33;Google Scholar
  5. Doke J. J., M. K. Gandhi (1909);Google Scholar
  6. Du Toit B. M., ‘Mahatma Gandhi in South Africa’, JMAS 34 (1996) 643–60;Google Scholar
  7. Gandhi M. K., Satyagraha in South Africa (1954);Google Scholar
  8. Hancock W. K., Smuts I (1965) 309–47, II (1968) 128–49;Google Scholar
  9. Huttenback R. A., Gandhi in South Africa (1971);Google Scholar
  10. Meer F., The South African Gandhi, 1893–1914: An Abstract of the Speeches and Writings of M. K. Gandhi (2 edn, 1996);Google Scholar
  11. Nanda B. R., Mahatma Gandi (1958);Google Scholar
  12. Power P. R., ‘Gandhi in South Africa’, JMAS 7 (1969) 441–56;Google Scholar
  13. Swan M., Gandhi: The South African Experience (1985).Google Scholar

9.7 The revival of Afrikanerdom

  1. Antonissen R., Die Afrikaanse Letterkunde (1960); Davenport (n. 6.2);Google Scholar
  2. Dekker G., Afrikaanse Literatuurgeskiedenis (1963);Google Scholar
  3. Du Toit A., ‘Captive to the nationalist paradigm: F. A. van Jaarsveld and the historical evidence for the Afrikaner’s ideas on his calling and mission’, SAHJ 16 (1984) 49–80; and (nn. 3.1 and 6.2);Google Scholar
  4. Du Toit M., ‘Die Bewustheid van armoed: the ACW and the construction of Afrikaner identity, 1904–28’, SD 18 (1992) 1–25;Google Scholar
  5. Engelenburg F. V., General Louis Botha (1929);Google Scholar
  6. Garson N. G., ‘Het Volk: the Botha-Smuts party in the Transvaal, 1904–11’, HJ 9 (1966) 101–32;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Giliomee H., ‘Constructing Afrikaner nationalism’, JAAS 18 (1983) 83–98; and ‘The beginnings of Afrikaner nationalism, 1870–1915’, SAHJ 19 (1987) 115–42; and (n. 6.2); Hancock (n. 8.9);Google Scholar
  8. Hexham I., The Irony of Apartheid (1981);Google Scholar
  9. Moodie T. D., The Rise of Afrikanerdom: Power, Apartheid and the Afrikaner Civil Religion (1975);Google Scholar
  10. Pienaar E. C., Die Triomf van Afrikaans (1943);Google Scholar
  11. Scholtz G. D., Generaal C. F. Beyers (1941); Trollip A. E. G. (M. A. Witwatersrand, 1947) [Hertzog’s two-stream policy];Google Scholar
  12. Van den Heever C. M., General J. B. M. Hertzog (1946);Google Scholar
  13. Van Jaarsveld F. A., The Afrikaner’s Interpretation of South African History (1964); Van Onselen (n. 9.3); Yudelman D., ‘Afrikaner scabs and the 1907 strike: a state-capital daguerrotype’, AA 81 (1982).Google Scholar

9.8 The Transvaal British

  1. Denoon (n. 9.3); Duminy and Guest (n. 5.7); Fraser M. and Jeeves A., All that Glittered: Selected Correspondence of Lionel Phillips, 1890–1924 (1977);Google Scholar
  2. Katz E., A Trade Union Aristocracy (1976); Kubicek (n. 8.9); Marks and Trapido (n. 9.3);Google Scholar
  3. Mawby A., ‘Capital, government and politics in the Transvaal, 1900–7’, HJ 17 (1974) 387–415; Ticktin D. (Ph. D. thesis, Cape Town, 1973) [Labour Party].CrossRefGoogle Scholar

9.9 The move towards responsible government in the Transvaal and Orange River Colony

  1. Bennett A E. (B. Litt. thesis, Oxford, 1982) [West Ridgeway Committee]; *Duminy and Guest; Hancock (n. 8.9); Hyam R., Elgin and Churchill at the Colonial Office (1968) and withCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Martin G., Reappraisals in British Imperial History (1975); Le May (n. 8.9);Google Scholar
  3. Mansergh N., South Africa, 1906–61: The Price of Magnanimity (1962); Newton (n. 9.3); Pyrah (n. 9.4);Google Scholar
  4. Torrance D. E., The Strange Death of the Liberal Empire (1996).Google Scholar

9.10 The formation of the Union of South Africa, 1908–10

  1. Booth A. R., ‘Lord Selborne and the British protectorates, 1902–10’, JAH 10 (1969) 133–48;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brand R. H., The Union of South Africa (1909);Google Scholar
  3. Friedman B., Smuts: A Reappraisal (1975); Hancock (n. 8.9) and with Van der Poel J. eds, (1966) (n. 9.1);Google Scholar
  4. Hyam R., ‘African interests in the South Africa Act, 1908–10’, HJ 13 (1970) 85–105;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Malan F. S., Konvensie-Dagboek (1951); Newton (n. 9.3);Google Scholar
  6. Thompson L. M., The Unification of South Africa (1960) and in BSALR (1954); Van der Poel (n. 8.8); Walker (n. 6.2);Google Scholar
  7. Walton E. H., The Inner History of the National convention (1912).Google Scholar

9.11 Black protest

  1. Adhikari M., ‘Protest and accommodation: ambiguities in the racial politics of the APO, 1909–23’, Kronos 20 (1993) 92–106; and ‘Let us Live for our Children’. The Teachers’ League of South Africa 1913–40 (1993); and ‘Coloured identity and the politics of Coloured education: origins of the Teachers League of South Africa’, IJAHS 27 (1994) 101–26; Hyam (n. 9.10); *Karis and Carter I; Lewis (n. 9.5); Maylam (n. 4.1); Odendaal (n. 6.3); Thompson (n. 9.10); Walker (n. 6.2).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© T. R. H. Davenport and Christopher Saunders 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. R. H. Davenport
    • 1
  • Christopher Saunders
    • 2
  1. 1.Rhodes UniversityGrahamstownSouth Africa
  2. 2.University of Cape TownSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations