Advertisement

South Africa pp 194-232 | Cite as

Empire and Republics: the Breaking of Boer Independence, 1850–1902

  • T. R. H. Davenport
  • Christopher Saunders

Abstract

Successive British cabinets through the nineteenth century debated the merits of formal and informal empire in southern Africa. After many changes of policy it was eventually decided in 1899 to make war against the Boer republics in order to establish a firm paramountcy over the whole region. The events leading up to this decision have provided much fodder for the twentieth-century debate over the meaning of imperialism, in which several strands of argument may be discerned. Thus the role of the humanitarian lobby, seldom if ever dominant, yet seldom so insignificant that politicians of either party could afford to ignore it, was deplored in the later writings of G. M. Theal, and commended in those of W. M. Macmillan, but neither doubted its importance. Others, notably J. S. Galbraith, have seen the hand of the British Treasury as the ruling influence in the formulation of British policy, ‘reluctantly’ extending the imperial frontiers, and economising in the use of governmental and military resources. Considerations of grand strategy dominated the thinking of leading imperialists, in the view of Robinson and Gallagher. Others have traced the key initiatives less to the Colonial Office than to the periphery. Benyon, for example, has displayed the innovatory role of a succession of Imperial high commissioners. ‘Peripheral imperialism’, as Kubicek and Schreuder have described it, was rather the work of ‘subcontracting’ merchants and land-seekers in the colonies themselves.

Keywords

High Commissioner Native Policy Mining House Military Authority British Policy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliographical Notes

8.1 Formal and informal Empire

  1. Atmore A. and Marks S., ‘The imperial factor in South Africa in the 19th century: towards a reassessment’, JICH (1969) 105–39; Benyon J. A., Proconsul and Paramountcy in South Africa: The High Commission, British Supremacy and the Subcontinent, 1806–1910 (1980);Google Scholar
  2. Cain P. J. and Hopkins A. G., British Imperialism, 1688–1890 (1993);Google Scholar
  3. De Cecco M., Money and Empire: The International Gold Standard, 1890–1914 (1974);Google Scholar
  4. Etherington N. A., ‘Theories of imperialism in southern Africa revisited’, AA 81, 323 (1982) 385–407; and Theories of Imperialism: War, Conquest and Capital (1984); Galbraith (n. 7.3);Google Scholar
  5. Hobson J. A., Imperialism: a Study (1902); Kubicek (n. 5.7);Google Scholar
  6. Louis W. R., Imperialism: The Robinson and Gallagher Controversy (1976);Google Scholar
  7. Robinson R. E. and Gallagher J., Africa and the Victorians (1981 edn); Schreuder (n. 8.6).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

8.2 The pursuit of the Voortrekkers

  1. Agar-Hamilton (n. 7.5); Benyon (n. 8.1); De Kiewiet (n. 7.4); Harington A. L., Sir Harry Smith: Bungling Hero (1980); Keegan (n. 2.3);Google Scholar
  2. Midgley J. F., The Orange River Sovereignty, 1848–54, (AYB 1949); Morrell (n. 7.4); Muller (n. 3.7); Thompson L. M., ‘The great trek, 1836–54’, in *Wilson and Thompson I 405–24; Van Jaarsveld (n. 5.2).Google Scholar

8.3 Republican independence: the Sand River and Bloemfontein Conventions

  1. Benyon (n. 8.1); De Kiewiet (n. 7.4); Eybers G. W., Select Constitutional Documents illustrating South African history (1918); Keegan (n. 2.3); Morrell (n. 7.4); Orpen (n. 5.4); Van Schoor (n. 5.4).Google Scholar

8.4 The high commissionerships of Sir George Grey, 1854–61, and Sir Philip Wodehouse, 1862–70

  1. Benyon (n. 8.1); Du Toit (n. 7.3); Peires (n. 7.3); Rutherford (n. 6.1); Zeeman M. J. (M.A. Cape Town) [Wodehouse as governor].Google Scholar

8.5 Sir Henry Barkly and the diamond fields, 1870–7

  1. Agar-Hamilton (n. 7.5); De Kiewiet (n. 7.4); Macmillan M., Sir Henry Barkly (1969);Google Scholar
  2. Oberholster J. J., Die Anneksasie van Griekwaland-Wes (AYB 1945);Google Scholar
  3. Robertson M., Diamond Fever: South African Diamond History, 1866–69 (1974);Google Scholar
  4. Sauer H., Ex Africa (1937); Shillington (n. 7.8); Shillington (n. 7.8);Google Scholar
  5. Simons P. B. (ed.), John Blades Currey, ‘Fifty Years in South Africa, 1850–1900’ (1986);Google Scholar
  6. Smith K. W., Alfred Aylward: The Tireless Agitator (1983);Google Scholar
  7. Van Jaarsveld F. A., Vaalrivier, Omstrede Grenslyn (1974). (See also 6.2 and 20.2).Google Scholar

8.6 Federal strategies, 1874–80: Carnarvon, Frere, Shepstone and the annexation of the Transvaal

  1. *Atmore and Marks; Brookes E. H., White Rule in South Africa (1974);Google Scholar
  2. Cope R. L., ‘Shepstone, the Zulus and the annexation of the Transvaal’, SAHJ 4 (1972) 45–63; and ‘Strategic and socio-economic explanations for Carnarvon’s confederation policy: the historiography and the evidence’, HIA 13 (1986) 13–34; De Kiewiet (n. 5.6);Google Scholar
  3. Dunn W. H., J. A. Froude (1961); Engelbrecht (1946) (n. 5.6);Google Scholar
  4. Etherington N. A., ‘Labour supply and the generation of South African Confederation in the 1870s’, JAH 20 (1979) 235–53;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Goodfellow C. F., Great Britain and South African Confederation (1966); Macmillan (n. 8.5);Google Scholar
  6. Schreuder D. M., The Scramble for Southern Africa, 1877–95 (1980);Google Scholar
  7. Solomon W. E. G., Saul Solomon (1948).Google Scholar

8.7 Republican independence again, 1881–4: the Pretoria and London Conventions; conflict over Basutoland and the ‘Road to the North’, 1880–5

  1. Agar-Hamilton (n. 7.5); Dachs (n. 7.10); Davenport (n. 6.2); Hall K. O., Imperial Proconsul: Sir Hercules Robinson and South Africa, 1881–9 (1980); Kruger D. W. (n. 5.5);Google Scholar
  2. Schreuder D. M., Gladstone and Kruger (1969) and (n. 8.6); Shillington (n. 7.8);Google Scholar
  3. Sillery A., John Mackenzie of Bechuanaland (1971);Google Scholar
  4. Van Jaarsveld F. A. et al., Die eerste Vryheidsoorlog, 1880–1 (1980).; Wilburn K. (D. Phil. thesis, Oxford, 1982) [railway politics]Google Scholar

8.8 The scramble for southern Africa: gold, railways and rival imperialisms, 1880–95

  1. Axelson E., Portugal and the Scramble for Africa (1962); Butler J., ‘The German factor in Anglo-Transvaal relations’, in *Gifford and Louis 179–214; Galbraith (n. 7.9); Hofmeyr J. H. in *Walker 551–64; Kubicek (1979) (n. 5.7); Marais (n. 5.5);Google Scholar
  2. Marks S., ‘Scrambling for southern Africa’, JAH 23 (1982) 97–113; Maylam (n. 7.8); Mendelsohn (n. 5.7);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Phimister I., ‘Rhodes, Rhodesia and the Rand’, JSAS 1 (1974) 74–90; Schreuder (n. 8.6);Google Scholar
  4. Van der Poel J., Railway and Customs Policies in South Africa, 1885–1910 (1933);Google Scholar
  5. Van Winter P. J., Onder Krugers Hollanders (1937); Van Helten (n. 5.7);Google Scholar
  6. Warhurst P. R., Anglo-Portuguese Relations in South-Central Africa, 1890–1900 (1962).Google Scholar

8.9 Chamberlain, Rhodes, Milner and Kruger, 1895–9

  1. Ally R., Gold and Empire: The Bank of England and South Africa’s Gold Producers, 1886–1920 (1994); Benyon (n. 8.1); Blainey (n. 5.7);Google Scholar
  2. Butler J., The Liberal Party and the Jameson Raid (1968);Google Scholar
  3. Cammack D., ‘The politics of discontent: the grievances of the uitlander refugees, 1899–1902’, JSAS 8 (1982) 243–70; *Carruthers; Davenport (n. 6.2); De Cecco (n. 8.1); *Duminy and Guest;Google Scholar
  4. FitzPatrick J. P., The Transvaal from Within (1896);Google Scholar
  5. and Further South African Memories (ed. D. Lavin, 1979);Google Scholar
  6. Hancock W. K., Smuts: The Sanguine Years (1962);Google Scholar
  7. Hobson J. A., The War in South Africa (1902); Kubicek (1972) (n. 5.7); Henshaw P., ‘“The Key to South Africa” in the 1890s: Delagoa Bay and the origins of the South African War’, JSAS 24, 3 (1998);Google Scholar
  8. Le May G. H. L., British Supremacy in South Africa (1965);Google Scholar
  9. Le Roux F. J. and Van Zyl D. (eds), [Smuts J. C.], Een Eeuw van Onreg (1985); Lewsen (1982) (n. 6.8);Google Scholar
  10. Makhuru T. J., ‘Another road to the Raid: the neglected role of the Boer-Bagananwa war as a factor, 1894–5’, JSAS 21 (1995) 257–68; Marais (n. 5.5);Google Scholar
  11. Marks S. and Trapido S., ‘Lord Milner and the S., A. state reconsidered’, in Twaddle M., Imperialism, the State and the Third World (1992) 80–94; Mendelsohn (n. 5.7) and in *Carruthers 55–88;Google Scholar
  12. Ovendale R., ‘Profit and patriotism: Natal, the Transvaal and the coming of the second Anglo-Boer war’, JICH 8 (1980) 209–34;Google Scholar
  13. Pakenham E., Jameson’s Raid (1960);Google Scholar
  14. Phimister I., ‘Unscrambling the scramble for southern Africa: the Jameson Raid and the South African War revisited’, SAHJ 28 (1993) 203–20;Google Scholar
  15. Porter A. N., The Origins of the South African War: Joseph Chamberlain and the Diplomacy of Imperialism, 1895–9 (1980); and ‘Sir Alfred Milner and the press, 1897–9’, HJ 16 (1973); and ‘The South African war (1899–1902): context and motive reconsidered’, JAH 31 (1990) 43–57; Rotberg (n. 6.2); Saunders C. C. in *Carruthers 239–50;Google Scholar
  16. Smith I. R., The Origins of the South African War, 1899–1902 (1996), and in *Carruthers 89–110; and in SAHJ 22 (1990) 24–60;Google Scholar
  17. Spies S. B., The Origins of the Anglo-Boer War (1972);Google Scholar
  18. Van der Poel J., The Jameson Raid (1951); Van Helten (n. 5.7), and ‘Empire and high finance: South Africa and the international gold standard, 1890–1914’, JAH 23 (1982) 529–48; Walker (n. 6.2); Wilde R. H., ‘Joseph Chamberlain and the South African Republic, 1895–9’, (AYB 1956);Google Scholar
  19. Wilburn K., ‘The drifts crisis and the Jameson Raid: a centennial review’, JICH 25 (1997) 219–39.Google Scholar

8.10 The Anglo-Boer War of 1899–1902

  1. Bailes H. L., ‘Military aspects’, in *Warwick 65–102; Belfïeld E., The Boer War (1975);Google Scholar
  2. Breytenbach J. J., Die Geskiedenis van die Tweede Vryheidsoorlog in Suid-Afrika, 1899–1902 (6 vols, 1969–77);Google Scholar
  3. Brits J. P. (ed.), The Diary of a National Scout: P. J. du Toit (1974);Google Scholar
  4. Cammack D., The Rand at War, 1899–1902 (1978); Davenport (n. 6.2);Google Scholar
  5. Davey A. M., The British Pro-Boers, 1877–1902 (1978); and ed., Lawrence Richardson’s Selected Correspondence, 1901–3 (1977); and ‘Breaker Morant and the Bushveldt Carbineers (VRS 2nd ser. 18, 1987);Google Scholar
  6. Davidson A. and Filatova I., The Russians and the Anglo-Boer War (1998);Google Scholar
  7. Denoon D. J. N., ‘Participation in the “Boer war”: people’s non-war, or non-people’s war?’, in Ogot B.A., War and Society in Africa (1972) 109–22;Google Scholar
  8. De Wet C. R., Three Years War (1902);Google Scholar
  9. Foxcroft E., Russia and the Anglo-Boer War (1981);Google Scholar
  10. Fuller J. F. C., The Last of the Gentlemen’s Wars (1937);Google Scholar
  11. Galbraith J. S., ‘The pamphlet campaign in the Anglo-Boer war’, JMH 24 (1952) 111–26;Google Scholar
  12. Grundlingh A., Hensoppers and Joiners (1998), and ‘Collaborators in Boer society’, in *Warwick 158–78; Hancock (n. 8.9);Google Scholar
  13. Judd D., The Boer War (1977);Google Scholar
  14. Koss S., The Anatomy of an Anti-War Movement: The Pro-Boers (1973);Google Scholar
  15. Krikler J., ‘The Transvaal agrarian class struggle in the S.A. War, 1899–1902’, SD 12 (1986) 1–30; and (n. 7.11); Le May (n. 8.9); Lewsen P. (1982) (n. 6.8) and Selections from the Correspondence of]. X. Merriman (1966);Google Scholar
  16. Magnus P., Kitchener: Portrait of an Imperialist (1958);Google Scholar
  17. Marquard L. (ed.), Letters from a Boer Parsonage (1967);Google Scholar
  18. Morton R. F., ‘Linchwe I and the Kgastla campaign in the S.A. war, 1899–1902’, JAH 26 (1985) 169–92;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Nasson W. R., Abraham Esau’s War: A Black South African War in the Cape, 1899–1902 (1991);Google Scholar
  20. Pakenham T., The Boer War (1979);Google Scholar
  21. Plaatje S. T., Boer War Diary, ed. J. Comaroff (1973); Porter B., ‘Pro-Boers in Britain’, in *Warwick 239–57;Google Scholar
  22. Preller G. (ed.), Scheepers se Dagboek (1938);Google Scholar
  23. Pretorius F-J, Life on commando (1999), and in *Warwick 103–23;Google Scholar
  24. Price R., An Imperial War and the British Working Class (1972);Google Scholar
  25. Reitz D., Commando (1931); Snyman J. H., ‘Rebelle Verhoor in Kaapland, 1899–1902’ (AYB 1962);Google Scholar
  26. Spies S. B. and Nattrass G. (eds), Jan Smuts: Memoirs of the Boer War (1994), also in Van der Poel and Hancock (n. 9.1) 537–663; and ‘Women and the war’, in *Warwick 161–85;Google Scholar
  27. Strydom C. J. S., Kaapland in die Tweede Vryheidsoorlog (1937);Google Scholar
  28. Surridge K. T., Managing the South African War, 1899–1902: Politicians v. Generals (1998);Google Scholar
  29. Travers T. H. E., ‘Technology, tactics and morale: Jean de Bloch, the Boer War and military theory, JMH 51 (1979) 264–86;Google Scholar
  30. Van Reenen R. (ed.), Emily Hobhouse: Boer War Letters (1984);Google Scholar
  31. Van Wyk Smith M., Drummer Hodge: The Poetry of the Anglo-Boer War, 1899–1902 (1978);Google Scholar
  32. Viljoen B., My Reminiscences of the Anglo-Boer War (1903); *Warwick P., ed., and Black People in the Anglo-Boer War (1984);Google Scholar
  33. Wright H. M. (ed.), Sir James Rose Innes: Selected Correspondence 1884–1902 (1972).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© T. R. H. Davenport and Christopher Saunders 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. R. H. Davenport
    • 1
  • Christopher Saunders
    • 2
  1. 1.Rhodes UniversityGrahamstownSouth Africa
  2. 2.University of Cape TownSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations