Advertisement

South Africa pp 377-398 | Cite as

Trek into the Wilderness, 1948–60

  • T. R. H. Davenport
  • Christopher Saunders

Abstract

Dr Malan’s coalition Government was the first fully bilingual government in the history of the Union, and the first to consist of Afrikaners only. Its members had resolutely opposed taking part in the war against Nazi Germany. It was not easy under these circumstances for ex-soldiers and English-speakers to see that some members of the ruling party had been less attracted to Nazism than others; nor was it easy for the Nationalists, who had been bred on resentment at the treatment of their own people by Imperial Britain, to understand the revulsion with which their wartime attitude was regarded by Europeans (Continental as well as British) who had suffered as a result of the war.

Keywords

Civil Disobedience Group Area Work Peasant Coloured People Native Affair 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliographical Notes

14.1 The first purely Afrikaner government

  1. Ballinger (n. 12.1); Blackwell L., Blackwell Remembers (1971); Bradlow (n. 10.4);Google Scholar
  2. Carter G. M., The Politics of Inequality (1959); Heard (n. 13.2); Malan D. F. (nn. 10.6 and 11.2); Malan M. P. A. (n. 10.1);Google Scholar
  3. Marquard L., The Peoples and Policies of South Africa (1952);Google Scholar
  4. O’Meara D., Forty Lost Years: The Apartheid State and the Politics of the National Party, 1948–94 (1996);Google Scholar
  5. Schoeman B. M., Van Malan tot Verwoerd (1973);Google Scholar
  6. Seegers A., ‘Towards an understanding of the Afrikanerisation of the South African state’, Africa 63 (1993) 477–97, and ‘One state, three faces: policing in South Africa, 1910–90’, SD 17 (1991) 36–48; Thorn (n. 11.2); Watson (n. 16.4).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

14.2 The Coloured vote issue and new Opposition groups

  1. Ballinger (n. 12.1); Beinart B., ‘Sovereignty and the law’, THRHR 15 (1952) 101–34; Carter (n. 14.1);Google Scholar
  2. Cowen D. V., Parliamentary Sovereignty and the Entrenched Clauses of the South Africa Act (1951);Google Scholar
  3. Daniels E., There and Back (1998); Hahlo and Kahn (n. 12.4); Irvine D., ‘The Liberal Party, 1953–68’ in *Butler, Elphick and Welsh 116–35; Lewis (n. 9.5); Mouton (n. 12.2);Google Scholar
  4. Robertson J., Liberalism in South Africa 1953–63 (1971); Schoeman (n. 14.1);Google Scholar
  5. Spink K., Black Sash: The Beginning of a Bridge in South Africa (1991);Google Scholar
  6. Vigne R., Liberals against Apartheid: A History of the Liberal Party of South Africa. 1953–68 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

14.3 The politics of the Defiance Campaign

  1. Benson (n. 12.2); Carter C., ‘The defiance campaign — a comparative analysis of the organisation, leadership and participation in the eastern Cape and Transvaal’, ICS 2 (1971) 76–97;Google Scholar
  2. Feit E., South Africa: The Dynamics of the African National Congress (1962); Gerhart (n. 12.2); Ginwala F., ‘Women in the ANC’, ICS (1990);Google Scholar
  3. Johns S. and Davis H., Mandela, Tambo and the African National Congress (1991); Karis and Carter (n. 12.1); Google Scholar
  4. Kuper L., Passive Resistance in South Africa (1957); Lambert R. V. ‘Trade unionism, race, class and nationalism in the 1950s resistance movement’, in *Bonner, Delius and Posel 275–95; Lodge (n. 13.4); Google Scholar
  5. Luthuli A., Let My People Go (1963); Mager A. and Minkley G., ‘Reaping the whirlwind: the East London riots of 1952’, in *Bonner, Delius and Posel 229–51; Mandela (n. 15.2); Maylam (n. 4.1); Meli (n. 10.3); Google Scholar
  6. Ngubane J., An African Explains Apartheid (1963); Sampson (n. 13.5); Walshe (n. 10.3). Google Scholar

14.4 Tomlinson, Verwoerd and the ideology of apartheid

  1. Adam H. and Giliomee H., Ethnic Power Mobilised (1979); Ballinger (n. 12.1);Google Scholar
  2. Brookes E. H., Apartheid: A Documentary Study of Modern South Africa (1968);Google Scholar
  3. Cell J. W., The Highest Stage of White Supremacy: The Origins of Segregation in South Africa and the American South (1982);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Coetzee J. M., ‘The mind of apartheid: G. Cronje’, SD 17 (1991) 1–35;Google Scholar
  5. Cronje G., ’n Tuiste vir die Nageslag (1945), and Regverdige Rasse-Apartheid (1947); Dubow S., ‘Race, civilisation and culture: the elaboration of segregationist discourse in the inter-war years’, in *Marks and Trapido 71–94;Google Scholar
  6. Dvorin E. P., Racial Separation in South Africa: An Analysis of the Apartheid Theory (1952); Eiselen W. W. M., ‘The meaning of apartheid’, RR (1948) 69–86; Google Scholar
  7. Evans M. S., Black and White in South East Africa: A Study in Sociology (1911); Google Scholar
  8. Fredrickson G. M., White Supremacy: A Comparative Study in American and South African History (1981); Giliomee H., ‘Apartheid, verligtheid and liberalism’, in *Butler, Elphick and Welsh 363–83; Greenberg S. B., ‘Ideological struggles within the South African State’, in *Marks and Trapido 389–418; Google Scholar
  9. Hepple A., Verwoerd (1967); Hexham (n. 9.7); Hirson B. (n. 16.8); Hoernle (n. 13.3); Hyslop J. (n. 12.3); Google Scholar
  10. Kenney H. F., Architect of Apartheid: H. F. Verwoerd — an Appraisal (1980); Lazar J., ‘Verwoerd and the visionaries: SABRA and apartheid, 1948–61’, in *Bonner, Delius and Posel 362–92; Legassick M., ‘The making of South African “native policy”, 1903–23: the origins of segregation’, ICS (1972); MacCrone (n. 7.1); Google Scholar
  11. Macmillan H., ‘“Paralysed conservatives”: W. M. Macmillan, the social scientists and the common society’, in Macmillan H. and Marks S., Africa and Empire: W. M. Macmillan, Historian and Social Critic (1989) 72–90;Google Scholar
  12. Macmillan W. M., My South African Years (1975); Google Scholar
  13. Meer Y. S. and Mlaba M. D., Apartheid — Our Picture (1983); Miller (n. 12.3); Google Scholar
  14. Pelzer A. N., Verwoerd Speaks (1966); Google Scholar
  15. Posel D., The Making of Apartheid, 1948–61: Conflict and Compromise (1991); and ‘Curbing African urbanization in the 1950s and 1960s’, in *Swilling, Humphries and Shubane 19–32; Rhoodie N. J. ed. (n. 15.4), and with Google Scholar
  16. Venter N. J., Apartheid (1959); Google Scholar
  17. Rich P., White Power and the Liberal Conscience: Racial Segegation and South African Liberalism (1984), and Hope and Despair: English-speaking Intellectuals and South African Politics, 1896–1976 (1993); Google Scholar
  18. SABRA, Integration and Separate Development (1952); Serfontein (n. 12.3); Schoeman (n. 14.1); Google Scholar
  19. Scholtz G. D., Dr H. F. Verwoerd (1974); Summary of the Report of the [ Tomlinson ] Commission for the Socio-Economic Development of the Bantu Areas (1955); Tatz (n. 10.2); Google Scholar
  20. Thompson L. M., The Political Mythology of Apartheid (1985); Google Scholar
  21. Vail L., ed., The Creation of Tribalism in South Africa (1989); Google Scholar
  22. Van Biljon P., Grensbakens tussen Blank en Swart in Suid-Afrika (1947); Verwoerd H. F. in Senate Debates (1951) cols. 2203–35, (1952) cols. 3587–614, (1954) cols. 2595–620, (1955) cols. 4527–46, (1956) cols. 3861–908 [policy motion speeches]. Google Scholar

14.5 The Strijdom interlude

  1. Basson (n. 13.8); Carter (n. 14.1); Malan D. F. (n. 14.1); Schoeman (n. 14.1).Google Scholar

14.6 The defeat of the Coloured parliamentary struggle

  1. Ballinger (n. 12.1); Carter (n. 12.1) 146–63, Dlamini C. R. M., ‘The senate case revisited’. SALJ 105 (1988) 470–8; Hahlo and Kahn (n. 12.4); Lewis (n. 9.5);Google Scholar
  2. Mansergh N., Documents and Speeches on Commonwealth Affairs, 1952–62 (1963) 306–32; Miller (n. 15.6); Robertson (n. 19.2); Schoeman (n. 14.1); Sher (n. 14.2); Spink (n. 14.2);Google Scholar
  3. Van der Ross R. E., The Rise and Decline of Apartheid: A Study of Political Movements among the Coloured People of South Africa, 1880–1965 (1986);Google Scholar
  4. Wiechers M., ‘The fundamental laws behind our constitution’, in Kahn E. (ed.), Fiat Justifia: Essays in Memory of O. D. Schreiner (1983).Google Scholar

14.7 Residential and cultural apartheid

  1. Adler G., ‘Trying not to be cruel: local government resistance to the application of the group areas act in Uitenhage, 1945–62’, ICS 15 (1990) 168–85; Beale (n. 20.5); Brookes (n. 14.4); Cronje (n. 14.4);Google Scholar
  2. Davenport T. R. H., Black Grahamstown: The Agony of a Community (SAIRR, 1980); Eiselen (n. 14.4); Hoernlé (n. 13.3); Horrell M. (ed.), Survey of Race Relations (SAIRR: annual volumes), and The Group Areas Act: Its Effect on Human Beings (SAIRR 1956) and Group Areas: The Emerging Pattern (SAIRR 1966); Mesthrie U. S. (n. 20.5b);Google Scholar
  3. Nixon R., ‘The devil in the black box: ethnic nationalism, cultural imperialism and the outlawing of television under apartheid’, ICS 19 (1993) 120–37;Google Scholar
  4. Pinnock D., The Brotherhoods: Street Gangs and State Control in Cape Town (1984); Rhoodie and Venter (n. 14.4);Google Scholar
  5. Rive R., Buckingham Palace, District Six (1986);Google Scholar
  6. Western J., Outcast Cape Town (1981).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© T. R. H. Davenport and Christopher Saunders 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. R. H. Davenport
    • 1
  • Christopher Saunders
    • 2
  1. 1.Rhodes UniversityGrahamstownSouth Africa
  2. 2.University of Cape TownSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations