Advertisement

South Africa pp 267-299 | Cite as

Union under Stress: Botha and Smuts, 1910–24

  • T. R. H. Davenport
  • Christopher Saunders

Abstract

General Louis Botha’s Government took office on 31 May 1910 in the sunshine of Imperial approval, and dedicated to conciliation between Briton and Boer. The ministry contained almost as many British as Dutch names. In choosing it, Botha had drawn carefully from all provinces. Because of the manoeuvrings which had preceded his own appointment and the pressure inside his own party for the spoils of office, Botha could neither abandon party lines and choose a ministry of all the talents, nor divide the nation along lines which he would probably have preferred — with Jameson and the Unionists on the government benches, and Hertzog in opposition. This was ironic, for when the electorate went to the polls in September 1910 the policies of the South African and Unionist parties were difficult to distinguish. As Thompson has noted, both stressed the idea of a single South African nation (white by implication), both professed a non-doctrinaire native policy, both wanted white but not Asian immigration, material development, and Imperial preference, and neither sought special protection for the Afrikaner. Both hoped, in effect, that the spirit of tolerance would continue to grow in an atmosphere of ethnic peace. Problems arising from the relationship between blacks and whites did not appear to cloud the scene, for all save a few discerning thinkers like Abdullah Abdurahman, Olive Schreiner and M. K. Gandhi were inclined to leave these for the broader shoulders of the future.

Keywords

Active Citizen Labour Party White Worker General Strike Privy Council 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliographical Notes

10.1 Louis Botha’s accession to power and quarrel with Hertzog

  1. Davenport (n. 6.2); Engelenburg (n. 9.7); Garson N. G., Louis Botha or John X. Merriman: The Choice of South Africa’s First Prime Minister (1969); Hancock (n. 8.9), and Smuts: The Fields of Force (1968); Hancock and Van der Poel eds, (1966) (n. 9.1);Google Scholar
  2. Kruger D. W., South African Parties and Policies, 1910–60 (1960); Lewsen P., (1982) (n. 6.8); and Merriman Correspondence (1969);Google Scholar
  3. Malan M. P. A., Die Nasionale Party van Suid-Afrika, 1914–64 (1964);Google Scholar
  4. Spies F. du T., Kruger D. W. and Oberholster J. J., Hertzog-Toesprake (6 vols, 1977); Thompson (n. 9.10); Van den Heever (n. 9.7), Yudelman (n. 20.2)Google Scholar

10.2 The segregation strategy of the Botha-Smuts regime

  1. Davenport (n. 9.4); Feinberg H., ‘The 1913 Natives Land Act in South Africa: politics, race and segregation in the early 20th century’, IJAHS 26 (1993) 654–110;Google Scholar
  2. Kallaway P., ‘F. S. Malan, the Cape liberal tradition and South African politics, 1908–24’, JAH 15 (1974) 113–29;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Lacey M. J., Working for Boroko: The Origins of a Coercive Labour System in South Africa (1981); Legassick M., ‘The making of South African “native policy”, 1903–23; the origins of “segregation”’ (unp., ICS, 1972); Phillips H. ‘“Black October”: the impact of the Spanish influenza epidemic of 1918 on South Africa’ (AYB 1990/I);Google Scholar
  4. Plaatje S. T., Native Life in South Africa (2 ed., 1995); Rich (n. 6.8); Smuts (1929) (n. 11.2);Google Scholar
  5. Swanson M. W., ‘The sanitation syndrome: bubonic plague and urban native policy in the Cape Colony, 1900–9’, JAH 18 (1977) 387–410;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Tatz C. M., Shadow and Substance in South Africa (1962);Google Scholar
  7. Wickins P. L., ‘The Natives Land Act of 1913: a cautionary essay on simple explanations of complex change’, SAJE 49 (1981) 105–29;Google Scholar
  8. Willan B., ‘The Anti-Slavery and Aborigines Protection Societies and the South African Native Land Act of 1913’, JAH 20 (1979) 83–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

10.3 The growth of African political opposition: the SANNC and the ICU

  1. Baines G. (M.A. thesis, Rhodes, 1988) [Port Elizabeth Strike, 1920]; Beinart and Bundy (n. 15.1); Benson M., The Struggle for a Birthright (1966); Bonner P. L. in *Bozzoli, Labour, Township and Protest 273–97; Bradford (n. 11.5);Google Scholar
  2. Bundy C., ‘A voice in the big house: the career of headman Enoch Mamba’, JAH 22 (1981) 531–50;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Duncan D., ‘The state and African trade unions, 1904–28’, SD 18 (1992) 55–74;Google Scholar
  4. Kadalie C., My Life and the ICU (ed. S. Trapido) (1970); *Karis and Carter I; Lacey (n. 10.2);Google Scholar
  5. La Hausse P., ‘The message of the warriors: the ICU, the labouring poor and the making of a popular political culture in Durban’, ICS 15 (1990) 104–27; Maylam (n. 4.1);Google Scholar
  6. Meli F., South Africa Belongs to Us: A History of the A.N.C. (1988); Odendaal (n. 6.3); Perry (n. 4.3); Plaatje (n. 10.2);Google Scholar
  7. Roux E., Time Longer than Rope (1964 edn);Google Scholar
  8. Simons H. J. and R. E., Class and Colour in South Africa (1969); Van Onselen (n. 19.1);Google Scholar
  9. Walshe P., The Rise of African Nationalism in South Africa: The ANC, 1912–52 (1970); Wells (n. 11.5);Google Scholar
  10. Wickins P. L., The Industrial and Commercial Workers Union (1978);Google Scholar
  11. Willan B., Sol Plaatje: Selected Writings (1997).Google Scholar

10.4 Indian affairs: the climax of the Gandhi-Smuts encounter and the defiance of Sapru

  1. See entries under (nn. 6.7, 9.6 and 11.3).Google Scholar

10.5 White worker resistance, 1913–14

  1. Christie R., ‘Slim Jannie and the forces of production: South African industrialisation, 1915–25’, ICS 8 (1977) 94–114; Davies (n. 20.4b); Doxey (n. 20.4c); Hancock (n. 8.9); Hutt (n. 20.4c); Johnstone F. A. (n. 19.3); Katz (n. 20.4b);Google Scholar
  2. Marais A. H. (ed.), Politieke Briewe, 1909–12 (1971–3); Simons (n. 10.3);Google Scholar
  3. Moroney S., ‘Mine worker protest on the Rand, 1901–12’, in *Webster E. (ed.), Essays in Southern African Labour History (1978); Yudelman (n. 20.3c).Google Scholar

10.6 The invasion of German South West Africa and the Afrikaner rebellion of 1914

  1. Bottomley J., ‘The OFS and the rebellion of 1914: the influence of industrialisation, poverty and poor whiteism’, in *Morrell (n. 11.6); Davenport T. R. H., ‘The South African rebellion of 1914’, EHR 77 (1963) 73–94; Ehlers A., ‘Die Helpmekaar beweging in Suid-Afrika: die storm en drang jare 1915–20’ (AYB 1991/I);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Garson N. G., ‘The Boer rebellion of 1914’, HT 12 (1962) 132–9; Hancock (n. 8.9);Google Scholar
  3. Kemp J. C. G., Die Pad van die Veroweraar (1946);Google Scholar
  4. Maritz S. G., My Lewe en Strewe (1939);Google Scholar
  5. Naude J. D., General Hertzog en die Ontstaan van die Nasional Party, 1913–14 (1970);Google Scholar
  6. Scholtz G. D., General C. F. Beyers (1941), and Die Rebellie (1942); Snyman A., ‘Stem van ’n profeet’, SD 21 (1995);Google Scholar
  7. Stadler A. W., ‘The Afrikaner in opposition, 1910–48’, JCPS 7 (1969) 204–15;Google Scholar
  8. Steinmeyer J., Spykers met Koppe (1946).Google Scholar

10.7 South Africa in the Great War

  1. Buchan J., The South African Forces in France (1920);Google Scholar
  2. Garson N. G., ‘South Africa and World War I’, JICH 8 (1979) 68–85;Google Scholar
  3. Grundlingh A. M., Black Men in a White Man’s War: South African Blacks and the First World War (1986); Hancock (n. 8.9); Lacey M. J., ‘Platskiet politiek: the role of the U.D.F., 1910–24’ in *Cock and Nathan 28–39; Phillips H. ‘Black October: the impact of the Spanish influenza epidemic of 1918 on South Africa’ AYB, 1990/I; Seegers (n. 17.1);Google Scholar
  4. Spies S. B., ‘The outbreak of the first world war and the Botha government’, SAHJ 1 (1969) 47–57;Google Scholar
  5. Ticktin D., ‘The war and the collapse of the South African Labour Party’, SAHJ 1 (1969) 59–80; The Union of South Africa and the Great War, 1914–18 (1924);Google Scholar
  6. Willan B. P., ‘The South African Native Labour contingent, 1916–18’, JAH 19 (1978) 61–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

10.8 Party realignments, 1915–21

  1. Bouch R. J., ‘Farming and politics in the Karoo and eastern Cape, 1910–24’, SAHJ 12 (1980) 48–64; Hancock (n. 8.9) and (1968) (n. 10.1); Lewsen, Merriman Correspondence (VRS 50, 1969); Marais A. H., ed. (n. 10.1); and ‘Aspekte van die 1915 verkiesing’, SAHJ 5 (1973) 61–93;Google Scholar
  2. Reid B., ‘The general elections of 1920 and 1921 in Natal: Labour in triumph and defeat’, JNZH 2 (1979) 37–48; Spies et al. (n. 10.1).Google Scholar

10.9 Smuts at Versailles, the South West African mandate, and the bid to incorporate Southern Rhodesia and the Protectorates

  1. Chanock M., Britain, Rhodesia and South Africa, 1900–45: The Unconsummated Union (1977);Google Scholar
  2. Curry G., ‘Woodrow Wilson, Jan Smuts and the Versailles settlement’, AHR 66 (1961) 963–86;Google Scholar
  3. Hailey, Lord, The Republic of South Africa and the High Commission Territories (1963); Hancock (nn. 8.9, 9.1 and 10.1), and Survey of British Commonwealth Affairs I (1937);Google Scholar
  4. Hyam R., The Failure of South African Expansion, 1908–48 (1972);Google Scholar
  5. Lee M. E., ‘The origins of the Rhodesian responsible government movement’, RH 6 (1975) 33–52; and ‘An analysis of the Rhodesian referendum, 1922’, RH 8 (1977) 71–98;Google Scholar
  6. Long B. K., Drummond Chaplin (1941);Google Scholar
  7. Smuts J. C., The League of Nations: A Practical Suggestion (1917); and Africa and some World Problems (1929);Google Scholar
  8. Van der Poel J., Selections from the Smuts Papers V (1973);Google Scholar
  9. Warhurst P. R., ‘Rhodesian-South African relations, 1900–23’, SAHJ 3 (1971) 92–107; and ‘Smuts and Africa: a study in sub-imperialism’, SAHJ 16 (1984) 82–100.Google Scholar

10.10 Shadows over the Smuts regime, 1921–2: Bondelswarts, Bulhoek and the Rand rebellion

  1. Bonner (n. 10.3); Davey A. M., The Bondelswarts Affair (UNISA, 1961); Davies (n. 19.3);Google Scholar
  2. Edgar R. R. Because They Chose the Plan of God: The Story of the Bulhoek Massacre (1988);Google Scholar
  3. Freislich R., The Last Tribal War (1964); Hancock (1968) (n. 10.1);Google Scholar
  4. Herd N., 1922: The Revolt on the Rand (1966); Hunter (n. 4.4); Johnstone (n. 20.3); Kelly R. D. G., ‘The religious Odyssey of African radicals: notes on the Communist Party of South Africa, 1921–34’, RHR (1991) 5–24; Meli (n. 10.3); Roux (n. 19.3); Simons (n. 10.3); Sundkler (1961) (n. 9.5);Google Scholar
  5. Walker I. L. and Weinbren B., 2000 Casualties (1961); Yudelman (n. 20.3c).Google Scholar

10.11 The Nationalist-Labour pact and the 1924 General election

  1. Creswell M., An Epoch in the History of South Africa: The Life of F. H. P. Creswell (1956); Hancock (1968) (n. 10.1); Kruger (n. 10.1); Lewis (n. 9.5);Google Scholar
  2. O’Dowd C. E. M., ‘The general election of 1924’, SAHJ 2 (1970) 54–76; Spies et al. (n. 10.1); Van den Heever (n. 9.7).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© T. R. H. Davenport and Christopher Saunders 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. R. H. Davenport
    • 1
  • Christopher Saunders
    • 2
  1. 1.Rhodes UniversityGrahamstownSouth Africa
  2. 2.University of Cape TownSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations