Abstract
Since the publication of Vineta Colby’s The Singular Anomaly: Women Novelists of the Nineteenth Century (1970), Vernon Lee’s work on aesthetics has received most attention from feminist literary critics (Colby 2003, 235–304). Gillian Beer has written that ‘Vernon Lee does not “fit”’ (Beer 1997, 109) and this statement seems to hold especially true for Lee’s numerous writings on the perception of form, beauty and ugliness, as well as on psychological and physiological aesthetics. In this chapter I take a new angle on these works and their reception, beginning with a survey of the secondary literature on Lee’s treatises on aesthetics and comparing this to existing and potential readings of similar writings by the connoisseur and art historian, Bernard Berenson, Lee’s acquaintance and neighbour in Florence who famously accused Lee of plagiarism in 1897.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2006 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Briggs, J. (2006). Plural Anomalies: Gender and Sexuality in Bio-Critical Readings of Vernon Lee. In: Maxwell, C., Pulham, P. (eds) Vernon Lee. Palgrave Studies in Nineteenth-Century Writing and Culture. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230287525_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230287525_10
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-54332-8
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-28752-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)