Skip to main content

Power Relationships in Research Teams

  • Chapter
Book cover Power, Knowledge and the Academy

Abstract

This is our first collaborative writing together even though our ‘we’ voice might suggest that we have previously belonged to the same research teams. We use ‘we’ as a device in this chapter to describe the range of our teamwork experiences in an anonymous way. We write from a position of feeling marginal inside academic institutions, even though we are surrounded by female, often ‘feminist’, colleagues (Reay 2000; Morley 1999). In common with other feminist academics, we feel more acknowledged and valued as researchers outside our institutions than within them. Partly, we realise this is linked to different discourses of performativity that dominate in specific settings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bell, L. and Nutt, L.(2002) Divided loyalties, divided expectations: research ethics, professional and occupational responsibilities, in Mauthner, M., Birch, M., Jessop, J. and Miller, T.(eds), Ethics in Qualitative Research, London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, M.(2004) A feminist critique of public policy discourses about educational effectiveness, in Ali, S., Benjamin, S. and Mauthner, M.(eds), The Politics of Gender and Education: Critical Perspectives, Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deem, R.(2002) Talking to university managers–methodological dilemmas and feminist research strategies, Sociology 36(4) 835–855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deem, R.(2004) Gender, organisational cultures and the practices of manager-academics in UK Universities, Gender, Work and Organisation, 10(2) 239–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, M.(2005a) Killing Thinking: Death of the University, London/New York: Continuum International Publishing Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, M.(2005b) Too bad, ‘good girl’, The Times Higher Education, 22 July.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, H. & Harding, N.(2005) We went looking for the organisation but could find only the metaphysics of its presence, Sociology 38(4) 815–830.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hey, V.(2001) The construction of academic time: sub/contracting academic labour in research, Journal of Education Policy, 16(1) 67–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holland, J., Ramazanoglu, C., Sharpe, S. and Thomson, R.(with Rhodes, T.)(1998) The Male in the Head: Heterosexuality and Power, London: Tufnell Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • hooks, b.(1996) Sisterhood, in Penny Weiss and Marilyn Friedman(eds), Feminism and Community, Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddox, B.(2003) Rosalind Franklin: The Dark Lady of DNA, Glasgow: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mauthner, M.(2002) Sistering: Power and Change in Female Relationships, Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morley, L.(1999) Organising Feminisms. The Micropolitics of the Academy, New York: St Martins Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Morley, L.(2003) Quality and Power in Higher Education, Buckingham: Open SRHE and University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakley, A.(1995) Women and children first and last: parallels and differences between children’s and women’s studies, in B. Mayall(ed.), Children’s Childhoods, Sussex: Falmer Press, pp. 13–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Leary, V. and Mitchell, J.(1990) Women connecting with women: networks and mentors, in S.S. Lie and V. O’Leary(eds), Storming the Tower: Women in the Academic World, London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reay, D.(2000) ‘Dim dross’: marginalised women both inside and outside the academy’, Women’s Studies International Forum, 23(1) 13–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sagaria, M.A.D. and Rychener, M.A.(2004) Inside leadership circles and the managerial quagmire: key influences on women administrators’ mobility and opportunity in US Higher Education, in Ali, S., Benjamin, S. and Mauthner, M.(eds), The Politics of Gender and Education: Critical Perspectives, Palgrave: Basingstoke.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trowler, P.(2001) Captured by the discourse? The socially constitutive power of new higher education discourse in the UK, Organization, 8(2) 183–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weedon, C.(1987) Feminist Practice and Poststructuralist Theory, Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2007 Melanie Mauthner and Linda Bell

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mauthner, M., Bell, L. (2007). Power Relationships in Research Teams. In: Gillies, V., Lucey, H. (eds) Power, Knowledge and the Academy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230287013_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics