Abstract
Since the early 1980s many literary critics have held firmly to the assumption that Collins’s best-known works are subversive because they question the links between appearance and reality.1 Yet, as my preceding chapters have aimed to show, if the main effect of Collins’s fiction was to reveal how hidden energies lurked beneath false appearances, his works could hardly claim to be subversive or innovative because the concept of ‘outward show’ not correlating with ‘inner realities’ was already a ubiquitous Victorian idea. Studies like Gilbert and Gubar’s Madwoman in the Attic (1979) have established how such ideas were pivotal to nineteenth-century conceptualisations of femininity. As an example, William Black earnestly warned the male readers of Temple Bar against female flirts in 1869. ‘Let all men beware’, he ominously advised, of ‘the typical flirt — the vampire who lives upon the hearts of men. […] This terrible woman […] generally comes in the most innocent guise — generally that of a little, soft, bigeyed girl’.2 Collins’s fiction was not unique in representing a non-correlative relationship between appearance and reality. Instead, it appears to have drawn upon a widespread concept that was often used to substantiate the era’s most oppressive gender norms as well as to question them. Modern studies that aim to demonstrate how Collins ‘lifts the veneer’ of nineteenth-century respectability thus reproduce a Victorian binary that, I argue, the author sought to exploit and unravel.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
In 1980, for example, Winifred Hughes argued that Collins ‘aims directly at the foundation of Victorian social dogma [... because he] explores forbidden territories and releases hidden sources of energy’. Similarly, Philip O’Neill notes the way ‘Collins is deliberately subverting the popular literary representation of women’ by revealing how ‘little can be taken at face value [and] appearance is not to be trusted’. More recently, Deborah Wynne has claimed that the author ‘probed the underside of respectable domesticity, laying bare its conuptions and areas of vulnerability’. Winifred Hughes, The Maniac in the Cellar: Sensation Novels of the 1860s (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1980), p. 144
Philip O’Neill, Wilkie Collins: Women, Property and Propriety (London: Macmillan, 1988), p. 5
Deborah Wynne, The Sensation Novel and the Victorian Family Magazine (Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2001), p. 149.
[William Black], ‘Flirts and Flirtation’, Temple Bar, 26 (1869), pp. 58–67.
Jenny Bourne Taylor, In The Secret Theatre of Home: Wilkie Collins, Sensation Narrative, and Nineteenth-Century Psychology (London: Routledge, 1988), p. 7.
[James Hinton], ‘The Fairy Land of Science’, Cornhill Magazine, 5 (1862), pp. 36–42.
Forbes Winslow, On the Obscure Diseases of the Brain and Disorders of the Mind (1860; London: John Churchill and Sons, 1868), p. xi.
Wilkie Collins, ‘A Shockingly Rude Article (Communicated by a Charming Woman)’ (1858), in My Miscellanies (1863; London: Chatto and Windus, 1875), pp. 18–29.
Lillian Nayder, Wilkie Collins (New York: Twayne Publishers, 1997), p. 15.
Alexander Grinstein, Wilkie Collins: Man of Mystery and Imagination (Madison, CT: International Universities Press, 2003), p. 101.
Virginia Monis, Double Jeopardy: Women Who Kill in Victorian Fiction (Kentucky: The University Press of Kentucky, 1990), p. 105.
Wilkie Collins, The Woman in White, ed. by John Sutherland (1860; Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998), p. 569.
Anon., quoted in ‘Dr. Forbes Winslow’s Evidence in the Townley Case’, Journal of Mental Science, 14 (1864), pp. 295–7.
[J. W Kaye], ‘On Growing Old’, Cornhill, 5 (1862), pp. 495–507.
For particularly insightful examples see chapter four of Ann Cvetkovich, Mixed Feelings: Feminism, Mass Culture, and Victorian Sensa ti on a H sm (N e w Jersey: Rut ger s University Press, 1992)
Walter M. Kendrick, ‘The Sensationalism of The Woman in White’, in Wilkie Collins, ed. by Lyn Fykett (London: Macmillan Press, 1998), pp. 70–87.
Wilkie Collins, No Name, ed. by Virginia Blain (1862; Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998), p. 146.
[Margarent Oliphant], Review of No Name, Blackwood’s Edinburgh Magazine, 94 (1863), p. 170.
[Eneas Sweetland Dallas], ‘On Physiognomy’ and ‘The First Principle of Physiognomy’, Cornhill, 4 (1861), pp. 472–81.
Isaac Baker Brown, On the Curability of Certain Forms of Insanity, Epilepsy, Catalepsy and Hysteria in Females (London: Robert Hardwicke, 1866), p. 17.
Ornella Moscucci, The Science of Woman: Gynaecology and Gender in England 1800–1929 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990; repr. 1993), p. 115.
Mary Poovey Uneven Developments: The Ideological Work of Gender in Mid-Victorian England (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1988), pp. 24–50.
Forbes Winslow, Lettsomian Lectures on Insanity (London: John Churchill, 1854), p. 11.
Wilkie Collins, Armadale, ed. by Catherine Peters (1866; Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999), pp. 54–5.
Henry Maudsley, The Physiology and Pathology of Mind, reprinted and revised as Pathology of Mind (1867; New York: D. Appleton, 1894), p. 88.
Wilkie Collins, The Legacy of Cain (1889; Gloucestershire: Sutton Publishing, 1995), p. 326.
Jessica Maynard, ‘Black Silk and Red Paisley: The Toxic Woman in Wilkie Collins’s Armadale’, in Varieties of Victorianism: The Uses of a Past, ed. by Gary Day (London: Macmillan, 1998), pp. 63–79.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2007 Andrew Mangham
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mangham, A. (2007). Hidden Shadows: Dangerous Women and Obscure Diseases in the Novels of Wilkie Collins. In: Violent Women and Sensation Fiction. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230286993_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230286993_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-36070-3
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-28699-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)