Abstract
In its extreme form, the redistributive model is a model of autarchy: everything necessary is to be found inside the oikos, be it the household or the state. If nevertheless certain products have to be obtained from the outside, two means are employed by the central state to overcome the ideological difficulty that this produces. First, the foreign goods are dismissed as coarse ‘raw materials’ that have no significance until processed and utilized by the only civilized country. Secondly, acquisition of the foreign goods is cited as evidence of central control of the entire world; thus self-sufficiency is extended rather than renounced.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
J. V. Canby in OA, 15 (1976), pp. 33–42.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2001 Mario Liverani
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Liverani, M. (2001). Self-sufficiency vs. Interdependence. In: International Relations in the Ancient Near East, 1600–1100 BC. Studies in Diplomacy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230286399_25
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230286399_25
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-41439-0
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-28639-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)