Skip to main content

Different Faces of Risky Speech

  • Chapter
Game Theory and Pragmatics

Abstract

Suppose two individuals agreed to meet each other tonight at 10.00 o’clock in Amsterdam, but forgot to agree on a place (and don’t have the chance anymore to make an agreement). The two are now facing a coordination problem: only if they make a ‘correlated’ decision, will they land up at the same place and meet each other as desired.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Asher, N. and M. Williams (2005). Pragmatic reasoning, defaults and discourse structure. In this volume.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, J. L. (1962). How To Do Things With Words. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, H. H. (1996). Using Language. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Harsanyi, J. C. and R. Selten (1988). A General Theory of Equilibrium Selection in Games. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D. (1969). Convention: A Philosophical Study. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parikh, P. (2001). The Use of Language. CSLI Publications, Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Rooij, R. (2004). Evolution of conventional meaning and conversational principles. Synthese (Knowledge, Rationaltiy & Action), 139, 331–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Rooij, R. and K. Schulz (2004). Exhaustive interpretation of complex sentences. Journal of Logic, Language, and Information, 13, 491–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, J. J. (1755). Discours sur l’origine et les fondements de l’inégalité les hommes. Marc Michel Rey, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sally, D. (2003). Risky speech: behavioral game theory and pragmatics. Journal of Pragmatics, 35, 1223–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schelling, T. (1960). The Strategy of Conflict. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech Acts. An essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sevenster, M. (2004). Signaling games and non-literal meaning. In P. Egré et al., eds., Proceedings of the ESSLLI 2004 student session.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skyrms, B. (1990). The Dynamics of Rational Deliberation. Harvard University Pres, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skyrms, B. (2004). The Stag Hunt and the Evolution of Social Structure. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2006 Robert van Rooij and Merlijn Sevenster

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

van Rooij, R., Sevenster, M. (2006). Different Faces of Risky Speech. In: Benz, A., Jäger, G., van Rooij, R. (eds) Game Theory and Pragmatics. Palgrave Studies in Pragmatics, Language and Cognition. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230285897_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics