Abstract
This chapter looks at recent attempts to shed light on communication using game theory. It is divided into three parts. First, motivations for a game-theoretic approach to communication are briefly investigated. In the second part, one of the most fully developed game-theoretic accounts of communication is examined: Prashant Parikh’s post-Gricean utterance-by-utterance account (Parikh 1990, 1991, 2001). Doubts are raised about some of the aspects of Parikh’s treatment and suggestions are made for refinements of cost factors to improve predictive power. A more fundamental problem is that the model drops a Gricean constraint on inference in communication. I argue that this leaves it without an account of the content of implicatures. Some comparisons are made with relevance theory (Sperber and Wilson, 1986/95), a non-game-theoretic utterance-by-utterance account of communication, which retains a form of the Gricean constraint.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Asher, N., I. Sher, and M. Williams (1999). Game-theoretical foundations for gricean constraints. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth Amsterdam Colloquium. ILLC, Amsterdam.
Carston, R. (1998). Information, relevance and scalar implicature. In Carston and Uchida, eds., Relevance Theory: Applications and Implications, pp. 179–236. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
Carston, R. (2002). Thoughts and Utterances: The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication. Blackwell, Oxford.
Chomsky, N. (2001). Beyond explanatory adequacy. In MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics, volume 20. MITWPL, Cambridge, MA.
Colman, A. M. (2003). Cooperation, psychological game theory, and limitations of rationality in social interaction. In The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, volume 26, pp. 139–15.
Doyle, A. C. (1892/1957). The blue carbuncle. In J. Murray, ed., The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes. London. References are to the 1957 edition.
Gigerenzer, G., P. Todd, and the ABC Research Group (1999). Simple Heuristics that Make Us Smart. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Green, M. (1995). Quantity, volubility, and some varieties of discourse. Linguistics and Philosophy, 18, 83–112.
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole and J. Morgan, eds., Syntax and Semantics of Speech Acts, pp. 41–58. Academic Press, New York. Reprinted in Grice, H. P. (1989) Studies in the Way of Words. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 22–40. References here are by page numbers in Grice (1975).
Groenendijk, J. and M. Stokhof (1984). Studies on the Semantics of Questions and the Pragmatics of Answers. Ph.D. thesis, University of Amsterdam.
Happé, F. (1993). Communicative competence and theory of mind in autism: A test of relevance theory. Cognition, 48. 2, 101–19.
Horn, L. (1984). Towards a new taxonomy of pragmatic inference: Q-based and r-based implicature. In D. Schiffrin, ed., Meaning, Form, and Use in Context: Linguistic Applications, volume GURT84, pp. 11–42. Georgetown University Press, Washington.
Lewis, D. (1969). Convention. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Lewis, D. (1979). Scorekeeping in a language game. In R. Bäuerle et al., eds., Semantics from Different Points of View, pp. 172–87. Springer, Berlin.
Philosophical Logic, 8:339–59.
Parikh, P. (1991). Communication and strategic inference. Linguistics and Philosophy, 14, 473–513.
Parikh, P. (2000). Communication, meaning and interpretation. Linguistics and Philosophy, 23, 185–212.
Parikh, P. (2001). The Use of Language. CSLI Publications, Stanford, California.
van Rooij, R. (2003). Being polite is a handicap: Towards a game-theoretical analysis of polite linguistic behaviour. In Proceedings of TARK 9.
van Rooij, R. (2004a). Pragmatic meaning and non-monotonic reasoning: The case of exhaustive interpretation. Available from http://turing.wins.uva.nl/r,vanrooy/papers.html.
van Rooij, R. (2004b). Signaling games select Horn strategies. Linguistics and Philosophy, 27, 493–527.
Sally, D. (2003). Risky speech: behavioral game theory and pragmatics. Journal of Pragmatics, 35, 1223–1245.
Sperber, D. and D. Wilson (1986/95). Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Blackwell, Oxford, 2nd edition.
Sperber, D. and D. Wilson (1997). The mapping between the mental and the public lexicon. In UCL Working Papers in Linguistics, volume 9, pp. 107–25.
Reprinted in Carruthers, P. and Boucher, J., eds., (1998) Language and Thought: Interdisciplinary Themes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 184–200.
Stalnaker, R. (1973). Presuppositions. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 2, 447–57.
Wilson, D. and T. Matsui (1998). Recent approaches to bridging: Truth, coherence, relevance. In UCL Working Papers in Linguistics, volume 10, pp. 173–20.
Wilson, D. and D. Sperber (2004). Relevance theory. In G. Ward and L. Horn, eds., Handbook of Pragmatics, pp. 607–32. Blackwell, Oxford.
References here are to the longer version, Wilson, D. and Sperber, D. (2002) Relevance theory. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics, volume 14, pp. 249–287, also available online at http://www.phon.ucl.ac.uk/home/deirdre/.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2006 Nicholas Allott
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Allott, N. (2006). Game Theory and Communication. In: Benz, A., Jäger, G., van Rooij, R. (eds) Game Theory and Pragmatics. Palgrave Studies in Pragmatics, Language and Cognition. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230285897_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230285897_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-52317-7
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-28589-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Language & Linguistics CollectionEducation (R0)