Skip to main content

Abstract

The reach of the publicly funded sphere is being extended, as it increasingly incorporates the activities of a range of private actors. The large number of New Public Management (NPM) reforms, emphasizing the need for more market-like systems of control and production, constitute one driving force for these developments in the public sector from the 1980s onward. For with extended reliance on outsourcing, subcontracting, partnerships, and the like, private business firms are turning into important suppliers for the public sector in a range of fields, not least within services production.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Broadbent, J. and R. Laughlin (2003) “Public Private Partnerships: An Introduction,” Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 16: 332–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunsson, N. (1989) The Organization of Hypocrisy (Chichester: John Wiley and Sons).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunsson, N. (1994) “Politicization and ‘Company-ization’ — On Institutional Affiliation and Confusion in the Organizational World,” Management Accounting Research, 5: 323–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunsson, N. and J.P. Olsen (1993) “Reform and Power,” in N. Brunsson and J.P. Olsen (eds.) The Reforming Organization (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Child, J. and S.B. Rodrigues (2003) “Corporate Governance and New Organizational Forms: Issues of Double and Multiple Agency,” Journal of Management and Governance, 7: 337–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R. (1983) “The Other: A Model of Human Structuring,” in G. Morgan (ed.) Beyond Method: Strategies for Social Research (Newbury Park: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Czarniawska, B. (1985) “The Ugly Sister: On the Relationship Between the Private and the Public Sector in Sweden,” Scandinavian Journal of Management Studies, 2: 83–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Favarel-Garrigues, G., T. Godefroy and P. Lascoumes (2008) “Sentinels in the Banking Industry: Private Actors and the Fight Against Money Laundering in France,” British Journal of Criminology, 48: 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forssell, A. and D. Jansson (1996) “The Logic of Organizational Transformation: On the Conversion of Non-Business Organizations,” In B. Czarniawska and G. Sevón (eds.) Translating Organizational Change (Berlin: de Gruyter).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadde, L.-E. and H. Håkansson (1993) Professional Purchasing (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Greve, C. and G. Hodge (2005) “Introduction,” in G. Hodge and C. Greve (eds.) The Challenge of Public-Private Partnerships: Learning From Experience (Cheltenham: Edgar Elgar).

    Google Scholar 

  • Klijn, E.-H. and G.R. Teisman (2005) “Public-Private Partnerships as the Management of Co-Production: Strategic and Institutional Obstacles in a Difficult Marriage,” in G. Hodge and C. Greve (eds.) The Challenge of Public-Private Partnerships: Learning from Experience (Cheltenham: Edgar Elgar).

    Google Scholar 

  • Law, J. and M. Akrich (1994) “On Customers and Costs: A Story from Public Sector Science,” in M. Power (ed.) Accounting and Science (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, T. (1960) “Marketing Myopia,” Harvard Business Review, 4: 45–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Llewellyn, S. (1994) “Managing the Boundary: How Accounting is Implicated in Maintaining the Organization,” Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 7: 4–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubatkin, M.H., P.J. Lane, S.-O. Collin, and P. Very (2005) “Origins of Corporate Governance in the USA, Sweden and France,” Organization Studies, 26: 867–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, Y. (2005) “How does Globalization Affect Corporate Governance and Accountability? A Perspective from MNEs,” Journal of International Management, 11: 19–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J.W., D.J. Frank, A. Hironaka, E. Shofer, and N. Brandon Tuma (1997) “The Structuring of a World Environmental Regime, 1870–1990,” International Organization, 51: 623–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, P. (1994) “Accounting as Social and Institutional Practice: An Introduction,” in A.G. Hopwood and P. Miller (eds.) Accounting as Social and Institutional Practice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mörth, U. (2008) European Public-Private Collaboration: A Choice Between Efficiency and Democratic Accountability? (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar).

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, O., J. Guthrie, and C. Humphrey (eds.) (1998) Global Warning! Debating International Developments in New Public Financial Management (Oslo: Cappelen).

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrone, V., A. Zaheer, and B. McEvily (2003) “Free to be Trusted? Organizational Constraints on Trust in Boundary Spanners,” Organization Science, 14: 422–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perrow, C.B. (1986) Complex Organizations: A Critical Essay, third edition (New York: McGraw-Hill).

    Google Scholar 

  • Power, M. (1994) “The Audit Society,” in A.G. Hopwood and P. Miller (eds.) Accounting as Social and Institutional Practice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramirez, F.O. and J.W. Meyer (1998) “Dynamics of Citizenship Development and the Incorporation of Women: A Global Institutionalization Agenda,” in C. McNeely (ed.) Public Rights, Public Rules: Constituting Citizens in the World Policy and National Policy (New York: Taylor Francis).

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, J. (2005) “Agency Theory, Ethics and Corporate Governance,” Advances in Public Interest Accounting, 11: 249–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Røvik, K-A (1992) “InstitusjonaliserteStandarderogMultistandardorganisasjoner,” Norsk Statsvitenskapelig Tidsskrift, 8 (4): 261–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahlin, K. (2006) “Corporate Social Responsibility: A Trend and a Movement, but of What and for What?” Corporate Governance, 6: 595–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandebring, A. (2006) “Att organisera privat-offentlig samverkan,” Licenciate Thesis, Stockholm School of Economics (Stockholm: EFI).

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, A.G. and G. Palazzo (2008) “Introduction: The Emergence of Corporate Citizenship: Historical Development and Alternative Perspectives,” in A.G. Scherer and G. Palazzo (eds.) Handbook of Research on Global Corporate Citizenship (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, R.W. (1987) “The Adolescence of Institutional Theory,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 32: 493–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaoul, J. (2005) “The Private Finance Initiative or the Public Funding of Private Profit?” in G. Hodge and C. Greve (eds.) The Challenge of Public-Private Partnerships: Learning from Experience (Cheltenham: Edgar Elgar).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shearer, T. (2002) “Ethics and Accountability: From the for-Itself to the for-the-Other,” Accounting, Organizations and Society, 27: 541–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, A. (1995) “The Chameleon of Accountability: Forms and Discourses,” Accounting, Organizations and Society, 20: 219–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spekman, R.E. and E.W. Davis (2004) “Risky Business: Expanding the Discussion on Risk and the Extended Enterprise,” International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 34: 414–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svedberg Helgesson, K. (2009) “Företags ansvar,” Nordiske Organisasjonsstudier, 11: 30–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svedberg Nilsson, K. (2008) “Boundaries of Responsible Buying: Accountability for What and to Whom?” in M. Boström and C. Garsten (eds.) Organizing Transnational Accountability (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zelizer, V.A. (2005) The Purchase of Intimacy (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2010 Karin Svedberg Helgesson

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Helgesson, K.S. (2010). Partnerships, Boundary Blurring, and Accountable Actorhood. In: Bexell, M., Mörth, U. (eds) Democracy and Public-Private Partnerships in Global Governance. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230283237_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics