Skip to main content

individual learning in games

  • Chapter
  • 2312 Accesses

Part of the book series: The New Palgrave Economics Collection ((NPHE))

Abstract

Economic experiments on strategic games typically generate data that, in early rounds, violate standard equilibrium predictions. However, subjects normally change their behaviour over time in response to experience. The study of learning in games is about how this behavioural change works empirically. This empirical investigation also has a theoretical payoff: if subjects’ behaviour converges to an equilibrium, the underlying learning model becomes a theory of equilibration. In games with multiple equilibria, this same model can also serve as a theory of equilibrium selection, a long-standing challenge for theorists.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Anderson, C. and Camerer, C. 2000. Experience-weighted attraction learning in sender-receiver signaling games. Economic Theory 16, 689–718.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, G. 1951. Iterative solution of games by fictitious play. In Activity Analysis of Production and Allocation. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camerer, C.F. and Ho, T.-H. 1999. Experience-weighted attraction learning in normal-form games. Econometrica 67, 827–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camerer, C., Ho, T.-H. and Chong, J.-K. 2002. Sophisticated learning and strategic teaching. Journal of Economic Theory 104, 137–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camerer, C.F., Ho, T.-H. and Chong, J.-K. 2004. A cognitive hierarchy model of one-shot games. Quarterly Journal of Economics 119, 861–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chong, J.-K., Camerer, C. and Ho, T.-H. 2006. A learning-based model of repeated games with incomplete information. Games and Economic Behavior 55, 340–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, D. and Kagel, J. 2004. Learning and transfer in signaling games. Working paper, Ohio State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cournot, A. 1960. Recherches sur les principes mathématiques de la théorie des richesses. Trans. N. Bacon as Researches in the Mathematical Principles of the Theory of Wealth. London: Haffner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erev, I. and Roth, A. 1998. Modelling predicting how people play games: reinforcement learning in experimental games with unique, mixed-strategy equilibria. American Economic Review 88, 848–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, D. 1991. Evolutionary games in economics. Econometrica 59, 637–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fudenberg, D. and Levine, D. 1998. The Theory of Learning in Games. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harley C. 1981. Learning the evolutionary stable strategies. Journal of Theoretical Biology 89, 611–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ho, T.-H., Camerer, C. and Weigelt, K. 1998. Iterated dominance and iterated best-response in p-beauty contests. American Economic Review 88, 947–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ho, T.-H., Camerer, C. and Chong, J.-K. 2007. Self-tuning experience-weighted attraction learning in games. Journal of Economic Theory 133, 177–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, E. 2002. Two competing models of how people learn in games. Econometrica 70, 2141–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKelvey R. and Palfrey, T. 1995. Quantal response equilibria for normal form games. Games and Economic Behavior 10, 6–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mookerjhee, D. and Sopher, B. 1994. Learning behavior in an experimental matching pennies game. Games and Economic Behavior 7, 62–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mookerjee, D. and Sopher, B. 1997. Learning and decision costs in experimental constant-sum games. Games and Economic Behavior 19, 97–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, A.E. and Erev, I. 1995. Learning in extensive-form games: experimental data and simple dynamic models in the intermediate term. Games and Economic Behavior 8, 164–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selten, R. and Stoecker, R. 1986. End behavior in sequences of finite Prisoner’s Dilemma supergames: a learning theory approach. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 7, 47–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, D. 2000. Rule learning in symmetric normal-form games. Games and Economic Behavior: Theory and Evidence 32, 105–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weibull, J. 1995. Evolutionary Game Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2010 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ho, T.H. (2010). individual learning in games. In: Durlauf, S.N., Blume, L.E. (eds) Behavioural and Experimental Economics. The New Palgrave Economics Collection. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230280786_20

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics