Skip to main content

The Irrelevance of J.K. Rowling

  • Chapter
Re-Reading Harry Potter
  • 408 Accesses

Abstract

What about the author? I can see this question creeping up upon me from several directions. Did she intend that her books have the social and political effects that they have had? Is she responsible for those effects?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. W.K. Wimsatt and M.C. Beardsley, ‘The Intentional Fallacy’, Sewanee Review 54, 1946, pp. 468–88.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Roland Barthes, ‘The Death of the Author’, Image-Music-Text, trans. Stephen Heath (London: Fontana, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Karl Miller, Authors (Oxford: Clarendon, 1989), p. 164.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sean Burke, The Death and Return of the Author: Criticism and Subjectivity in Barthes, Foucault and Derrida (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1992), p. 154.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2009 Suman Gupta

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gupta, S. (2009). The Irrelevance of J.K. Rowling. In: Re-Reading Harry Potter. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230279711_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics