Skip to main content

The European Union’s Institutions

  • Chapter
Research Agendas in EU Studies

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics ((PSEUP))

  • 326 Accesses

Abstract

Until the early 1990s the literature on the EU’s institutions, like the literature on the European integration process more generally, was somewhat sparse. Not only was it sparse but much of it was also narrowly focused, not least in that it was mainly of an essentially descriptive and non-theoretical nature. Since the early 1990s, however, published work on the institutions has mushroomed, both in its empirical range and in that it has become increasingly conceptually and theoretically based. In this chapter we review these developments in the study of EU institutions. In so doing, we seek to highlight the main features of the different approaches that have been used, show what sort of knowledge has been attained, and identify key areas where understanding is still lacking and where further research and analysis is necessary. Given space constraints, we do not attempt to provide a complete literature review, but rather a broad overview of trends in research and the associated writing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abélès, M. and Bellier, I. (1996) ‘La Commission Européenne: Du Compromis Culturel á la Culture Politique du Compromis’, Revue Française de Science Politique 46(3): 431–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Achen, C.H. (2006) ‘Evaluating Political Decision-Making Models’, in R. Thomson, F.N. Stokman, C.H. Achen and T. König (eds) The European Union Decides (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) 264–98.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ackrill, R. and Kay, A. (2006) ‘Historical Institutionalist Perspectives on the Development of the EU Budget System’, Journal of European Public Policy 13(1): 113–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, K. and Bulmer, S. (1998) The Governance of the Single European Market (Manchester: Manchester University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Aspinwall, M and Schneider, G. (2000) ‘Same Menu, Separate Tables: The Institutionalist Turn in Political Science and the Study of European Integration’, European Journal of Political Science 38(1): 1–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bache, I. and George, S. (2006) Politics in the European Union (2nd edn) (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, R. and Widgren, M. (2004) ‘Council Voting in the Constitutional Treaty. Devil in the Details’, Brussels, Centre for European Policy Studies Brief, 6–7 July.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beach, D. (2005) The Dynamics Of European Integration: Why and When EU Institutions Matter (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Beach, D. and Mazzucelli, C. (2007) Leadership in the Big Bangs of European Integration (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Beetham, D. and Lord, C. (1998) Legitimacy and the European Union (London: Longman).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Best, E., Christiansen, T. and Settembri, P. (eds) (2009) The Institutions of the Enlarged European Union, Governance of the Wider Europe: EU Enlargement and Institutional Change (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar).

    Google Scholar 

  • Beyers, J. (2005) ‘Multiple Embeddedness and Socialization in Europe: The Case of Council Officials’, International Organization, 59(4)): 899–936.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulmer, S. (1994) ‘The Governance of the European Union: A New Institutionalist Approach’, Journal of Public Policy 13(4): 351–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bulmer, S. (2009) ‘Institutional and Policy Analysis in the European Union: From the Treaty of Rome to the Present’, in D. Phinnmemore and A. Warleigh-Lack (eds), Reflections on European Integration: 50 Years of the Treaty of Rome (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan) 109–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulmer, S. and Lequesne, C. (2005) (eds) The Member States of the European Union (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulmer, S. and Wessels, W. (1987) The European Council: Decision-Making in European Politics (London: Macmillan).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Burns, C. (2004) ‘Codecision and the European Commission: A Study of Declining Influence?’, Journal of European Public Policy 11(1): 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Checkel, J.T. (2006) ‘Constructivism and EU Politics’, in K.A., Pollack, M.A. and B. Rosamond (eds), Handbook of European Union Politics (London: Sage) 57–76.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Christiansen, T., Jorgensen, K-E., and Wiener, A. (1999) ‘The Social Construction of Europe’, special edition of Journal of European Public Policy 6(4).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cini, M. (1996) The European Commission: Leadership, Organisation and Culture in the EU Administration (Manchester: Manchester University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cini, M. (2000) ‘Administrative Culture in the Commission: The Cases of Competition and Environment’, in N. Nugent (ed.) At the Heart of the Union: Studies of the European Commission (2nd edn) (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan) 73–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cini, M. (2007) European Union Politics, (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Coombes, D. (1970) Politics and Bureaucracy in the European Community: A Portrait of the Commission of the EEC (London: George Allen & Unwin).

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbett, R. (2000) ‘Academic Modelling of the Codecision Procedure: A Practitioners Puzzled Reaction’, European Union Politics 1(3): 373–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbett, R., Jacobs, M., and Shackleton, M. (2007) The European Parliament (7th edn) (London: John Harper).

    Google Scholar 

  • Devuyst, Y. (2008) ‘The European Union’s Institutional Balance After the Treaty of Lisbon: Community Method and Democratic Deficit Reassessed’, Georgetown Journal of International Law 39(2): 247–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimitrakopoulos, D.G. (2004) The Changing European Commission (Manchester: Manchester University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, G. and Spence, D. (1997) (eds) The European Commission (2nd edn) (London: Cartermill).

    Google Scholar 

  • Egeberg, M. (2006) ‘Executive Politics as Usual: Role Behaviour and Conflict Dimensions in the College of European Commissioners’, Journal of European Public Policy 13(1): 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franchino, F. (2002) ‘Efficiency or Credibility: Testing the Two Logics of Delegation to the European Commission, Journal of European Public Policy 9(5): 677–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franchino, F. (2004) ‘Delegating Powers in the European Community’, British Journal of Political Science 34(2): 449–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franchino, F. (2007) The Powers of the Union: Delegation in the EU (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gerardin, D., Munoz, R. and Petit, N. (2005) Regulation Though Agencies: A New Paradigm of European Governance (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar).

    Google Scholar 

  • Grabbe, H. (2007) The EU’s Transformative Power: Europeanization through Conditionally in Central and Eastern Europe (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas, E.B. (1958) The Uniting of Europe: Political, Social and Economic Forces 1950–57 (Stanford: Stanford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Häge, F.M. (2008) ‘Who Decides in the Council of the European Union?’, Journal of Common Market Studies 46(3): 533–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagemann, S. and de Clerck-Sachsse, J. (2007) Old Rules, New Game: Decision-Making in the Council of Ministers After the 2004 Enlargement, CEPS Special Report, (Brussels: Centre for European Policy Studies), March; available at http://www.ceps.eu>

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagemann, S. and Hoyland, B. (2008) ‘Parties in the Council?’, Journal of European Public Policy 15(8): 1205–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P.A. and Taylor, R.C.R. (1996) ‘Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms’ Political Studies 44(5): 936–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes-Renshaw, F. and Wallace, H. (1995) ‘Executive Power in the European Union: The Functions and Limits of the Council of Ministers’, Journal of European Public Policy 2(4): 559–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes-Renshaw, F. and Wallace, H. (2006 [1997]) The Council of Ministers (2nd edn) (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes-Renshaw, F., Lequesne, C, and Lopez, P.M. (1989) ‘The Permanent Representations of the Member States to the European Communities’, Journal of Common Market Studies 28(2): 119–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes-Renshaw, F., Van Aken, W. and Wallace, H. (2006) ‘When and Why the EU Council of Ministers Votes Explicitly’, Journal of Common Market Studies 44(1): 161–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heisenberg, D. (2008) ‘How Should We Best Study the Council of Ministers?’, in D. Naurin, and H. Wallace (eds), Unveiling the Council of the European Union: Games Governments Play in Brussels (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan) 261–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hix, S. (2001) ‘Legislative Behaviour and Party Competition in the Post-1999 European Parliament: An Application of NOMINATE to the EU’, Journal of Common Market Studies 39(4): 663–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hix, S. (2002) ‘What Role for the European Parliament in a More Democratic European Union?’, One Europe or Several? — Newsletter, 7, Brighton: University of Sussex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hix, S. (2004) ‘Electoral Systems and Legislative Behaviour: Explaining Voter-Defection in the European Parliament’, World Politics 56(1): 194–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hix, S. (2005) The Political System of the European Union (2nd edn) (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hix, S. and Lord, C. (1997) Political Parties in the European Union (London: Macmillan).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hix, S., Noury, A.G. and Roland, G. (2007) Democratic Politics in the European Parliament (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann, A. and Wessels, W. (2008) T)er Vertrag von Lissabon-eine trag-faehige und abschliessende Antwort auf konstitutionelle Grundfragen?’, Integration 21(1): 3–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, S. (1966) ‘Obstinate or Obsolete: The Fate of the Nation State and the Case of Western Europe’, Daedelus 95: 862–915.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, S. (1982) ‘Reflection on the Nation State in Western Europe Today’, Journal of Common Market Studies 21(1–2): 21–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooghe, L. (1999) ‘Images of Europe: Orientations to European Integration Among Senior Officials of the European Commission’, British Journal of Political Science 29(2): 345–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooghe, L. (2001) The European Commission and the Integration of Europe: Images of Governance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooghe, L (2005) ‘Many Roads Lead to International Norms, But Few Via International Socialization’, International Organization 59(4): 861–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooghe, L. and Nugent, N. (2006) ‘The Commission’s Services’, in J. Peterson and M. Shackleton (eds), The Institutions of the European Union (2nd edn) (Oxford: Oxford University Press) 147–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hörl, B., Warntjen, A., and Wonka, A. (2005) ‘Built on Quicksand? A Decade of Procedural Spatial Models on EU Legislative Decision-Making’, Journal of European Public Policy 12(3): 592–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, F. and Corbett, R. (1990) The European Parliament (London: Longman).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordana, J. and Levy-Faur, D. (eds) (2004) The Politics of Regulation (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar).

    Google Scholar 

  • Judge, D. and Earnshaw, D. (2009) The European Parliament (2nd edn) (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasak, C. (2004) ‘The Legislative Impact of the European Parliament Under the Revised Co-Decision Procedure’, European Union Politics, 5(2): 241–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koepke, J.R. and Ringe, N. (2006) ‘The Second Order Election Model in an Enlarged Europe’, European Union Politics 7(3): 321–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohler-Koch, B. and Rittberger, B. (2007) Debating the Democratic Legitimacy of the European Union (Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreppel, A. (1999) ‘The European Parliament’s Influence Over EU Policy Outcomes’, Journal of Common Market Studies 37(3): 521–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreppel, A. (2000) ‘Rules and Ideology and Coalition Formation in the European Parliament: Past, Present and Future’, European Union Politics 1(3): 340–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreppel, A. (2002) The European Parliament and the Supranational Party System: A Study in Institutional Development (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurpas, S., Gron, C, and Kaczynski, P.M. (2008) The European Commission After Enlargement: Does More Add Up to Less?, CEPS Special Report, (Brussels: Centre for European Policy Studies), March; available at http://www.ceps.eu>

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindberg, L. (1963) The Political Dynamics of European Economic Integration (Stanford: Stanford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindberg, L. N., and Scheingold, S.A. (1970) Europe’s Would-Be Polity: Patterns of Change in the European Community (New York: Prentice Hall).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lodge, J. (1985) (ed.) Direct Elections to the European Parliament, 1984 (London: Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lodge, J. (1990) (ed.) Direct Elections to the European Parliament, 1989 (London: Macmillan).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lodge, J. (1996) (ed.) The 1994 Elections to the European Parliament (London: Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ludlow, P. (2002) The Seville Council (Brussels: Eurocomment).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ludlow, P. (2004) The Making of the New Europe: The European Councils in Brussels and Copenhagen 2002 (Brussels: Eurocomment).

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnette P. (2005) What is the European Union? (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Majone, G. (1992) ‘Regulatory Federalism in the European Community’, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 10(3): 299–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Majone, G. (1994) ‘The Rise of the Regulatory State in Europe’, West European Politics 17(3): 77–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Majone, G. (1996) Regulating Europe (London: Routledge).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Majone, G. (2006) Managing Europeanization: The European Agencies, in J. Peterson and M. Shackleton (eds) The Institutions of the European Union, 2nd edn, (Oxford: Oxford University Press) 190–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattila, M. (2004) ‘Contested Decisions — Empirical Analysis of Voting in the EU Council of Ministers’, European Journal of Political Research 31(1): 34–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattila, M. and Lane, J-E. (2001) ‘Why Unanimity in the Council? A Roll Call Analysis of Council Voting’, European Union Politics 2(1): 31–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, M. (2000) ‘Identities in the European Commission’, in Nugent, N. (ed.), At the Heart of the Union: Studies of the European Commission (2nd edn) (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan) 51–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGowan, F. and Wallace, H. (1996) ‘Towards a European Regulatory State’ Journal of European Public Policy 3(4): 560–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moravcsik, A. (1991) ‘Negotiating the Single European Act: National Interests and Conventional Statecraft in the European Community’, International Organization 45(1): 19–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moravcsik, A. (1993) ‘Preferences and Power in the European Community: A Liberal Intergovernmentalist Approach’, Journal of Common Market Studies 31(4): 473–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moravcsik, A. (1995) ‘Liberal Intergovernmentalism and Integration: A Rejoinder’, Journal of Common Market Studies 33(4): 611–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moravcsik, A. (1998) The Choice for Europe: Social Purpose and State Power from Messina to Maastricht (Ithaca: Cornell University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Naurin, D. and Wallace, H. (eds) (2008) Unveiling the Council of the European Union: Games Governments Play in Brussels (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuallin, CO. (1985) (ed.) The Presidency of the European Council of Ministers (London: Croom Helm).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nugent, N. (2000) At the Heart of the Union: Studies of the European Commission (2nd edn) (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nugent, N. (2001) The European Commission (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nugent, N. (2006) The Government and Politics of the European Union (6th edn) (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan) 219–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, M. (1981) The European Parliament (London: Pergamon).

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, J. and Bomberg, E. (1999) Decision-Making in the European Union (London: Macmillan).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pierson, P. (1996) The Path to European Integration: A Historical Institutionalist Analysis’, Comparative Political Studies 29(2): 123–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierson, P. (2000) ‘Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics’, American Political Science Review 94(2): 251–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierson, P. (2004) Politics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis (Princeton: Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollack, M.A. (1996) ‘The New Institutionalisms and EU Governance: The Promise and Limits of Institutionalist Analysis’, Governance 9(4): 429–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollack, M.A. (1997) ‘Delegation, Agency and Agenda Setting in the European Community’, International Organization 51(1): 99–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollack, M.A. (2003) The Engines of European Integration: Delegation, Agency and Agenda-Setting in the European Union (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pollack, M.A. (2006) ‘Rational Choice and EU Politics’, in K.E. Jorgenson, M.A. Pollack and B. Rosamond (eds) Handbook of European Union Politics (London: Sage) 31–55.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pollack, M.A. (2008) ‘The New Institutionalisms and European Integration’, conWEB-webpapers on Constitutionalism and Governance Beyond the State, 2008:1, available at <www.bath.ac.uk/esml/conWEB>

    Google Scholar 

  • Puchala, D.J. (1972) ‘Of Blind Men, Elephants and International Integration’, Journal of Common Market Studies 10(3): 267–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reif, K. (1985) (ed.) Ten European Elections: Campaigns and Results of the 1979/81 First Direct Elections to the European Parliament (Aldershot: Gower).

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J. (ed.) (2006) European Union: Power and Policy-Making (3rd edn) (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Risse, T. (2004) ‘Social Constructivism and European Integration’, in A. Wiener and T. Diez (eds), European Integration Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press) 159–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rittberger, B. (2007) ‘Political Preferences, Revealed Positions and Strategic Votes: Explaining Decision-Making in the EU Council’, Journal of European Public Policy 14(7): 1150–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, A. and Webb, A. (1985) The European Parliament in the EC Policy Process (London: Policy Studies Institute).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandholtz, W. and Stone Sweet, A. (eds) (1998) European Integration and Supranational Governance (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schalk, J., Torenvlied, R., Weesie, J., and Stokman, F. (2007) ‘The Power of the Presidency in EU Council Decision-Making’, European Union Politics 8(2): 229–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf, F.W. (1988) ‘The Joint Decision Trap: Lessons From German Federalism and European Integration’, Public Administration 66(3): 239–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf, F.W. (2006) ‘The Joint Decision-Trap Revisited’, Journal of Common Market Studies 44(4): 845–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schimmelfennig, F. (2001) The Community Trap: Liberal Norms, Rhetorical Action, and the Eastern Enlargement of the European Union’, International Organization 55(1): 47–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schimmelfennig, F. (2002) ‘Liberal Community and Enlargement: An Event History Analysis’, Journal of European Public Policy 9(4): 598–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schimmelfennig, F. (2004) ‘Liberal Intergovernmentalism’, in A. Wiener and T. Diez (eds) European Integration Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press): 75–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schimmelfennig, F. and Sedelmeier, U. (2005) The Politics of European Union Enlargement: Theoretical Approaches (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, S.K. (1998) ‘Commission Activism: Subsuming Telecommunications and Electricity Under European Competition Law’, Journal of European Public Policy 5(2): 169–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, S.K. (2000) ‘Only an Agenda Setter? The European Commission’s Power Over the Council of Ministers’, European Union Politics 1(1): 37–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, G. (2008) ‘Neither Goethe Nor Bismarck: On the Link between Theory and Empirics in Council Decision-Making Studies’, in D. Naurin, and H. Wallace (eds), Unveiling the Council of the European Union: Games Governments Play in Brussels (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan) 277–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Schoutheete, P. (2006) ‘The European Council’, in J. Peterson and M. Shackleton (eds), The Institutions of the European Union (2nd edn) (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • de Schoutheete, P. and Wallace, W. (2002) The European Council (Paris: Notre Europe), accessible at http://www.notre-europe.eu/en/>

    Google Scholar 

  • Scully, R. (2006) ‘Rational Institutionalism and Liberal Intergovernmentalism’, in M. Cini and A.K. Bourne (eds), Palgrave Advances in European Union Studies (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan) 19–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sedelmeier, U. and Schimmelfennig, F. (eds) (2005) The Europeanisation of Central and Eastern Europe (Cornell: Cornell University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Selk, T.J. (2006) Preferences and Procedures: European Union Legislative Decision-Making (Dordrecht: Springer).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Siotis, J. (1964) ‘Some Problems of European Secretariats’, Journal of Common Market Studies 2(3): 222–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence, D. (ed.) (2006) The European Commission (3rd edn) (London: John Harper).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, A. and Stevens, H. (2001) Brussels Bureaucrats? The Administration of the European Union (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone Sweet, A. and Sandholtz, W. (1997) ‘European Integration and Supranational Governance’, Journal of European Public Policy 4(3): 297–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, J. and Selck, J. (2007) ‘Political Preferences, Revealed Positions and Strategic Votes: Explaining Decision-Making in the EU Council’, Journal of European Public Policy 14(7): 1150–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tallberg, J. (2003) ‘The Agenda-Shaping Powers of the EU Council Presidency’, Journal of European Public Policy 10(1): 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tallberg, J. (2004) ‘The Power of the Presidency: Brokerage, Efficiency and Distribution in EU Negotiations, Journal of Common Market Studies 42(5): 999–1022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tallberg, J. (2008) ‘Bargaining Power in the European CounciP, Journal of Common Market Studies 46(3): 685–708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tallberg, J. and Johansson, K.M. (2008) ‘Party Politics in the European Council’, Journal of European Public Policy 15(8): 1222–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, R. (2008a) ‘The Council Presidency in the European Union: Responsibility With Power’, Journal of Common Market Studies 46(3): 593–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, R. (2008b) ‘The Relative Power of Member States in the Council: Large and Small, Old and New’, in D. Naurin, and H. Wallace (eds) Unveiling the Council of the European Union: Games Governments Play in Brussels (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, R., Stokman, F.N., Achen, C.H. and König, T. (2006) (eds) The European Union Decides (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Trondal, J. (2007) ‘Is the Commission a “Hothouse” for Supanationalism?’, Journal of Common Market Studies 45(5): 1111–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsebelis, G. (1994) ‘The Power of the European Parliament as a Conditional Agenda Setter’, American Political Science Review 88(1): 128–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsebelis, G. and Garrett, G. (1997) ‘Agenda Setting, Vetoes and the European Union’s Co-Decision Procedure’, Journal of Legislative Studies 3: 74–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsebelis, G. and Garrett, G. (2000) ‘Legislative Politics in the European Union’, European Union Politics 1: 5–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsebelis, G. and Garrett, G. (2001) ‘The Institutional Foundations of Intergovernmentalism and Supranationalism in the European Union’, International Organization 55(2): 357–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, H. (2007) Adapting to Enlargement of the European Union: Institutional Practice Since May 2004 (Brussels: TEPSA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, H. and Edwards. G. (1976) ‘European Community: The Evolving Role of the Presidency of the Council’, International Affairs 57(4): 535–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, H, Wallace, W. and Webb, C. (1977) (eds) Policy-Making in the European Communities (Chichester: John Wiley).

    Google Scholar 

  • Warntjen, A. (2008) ‘The Council Presidency: Power Broker or Burden? An Empirical Analysis’, European Union Politics 9(3): 315–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werts, J. (2008) The European Council (London: John Harper Publishing).

    Google Scholar 

  • Westlake, M. (1995) The Council of the European Union (London: Cartermill).

    Google Scholar 

  • Westlake, M. and Galloway, D. (2004) The Council of the European Union (3rd edn) (London: John Harper Publishing).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiener, A. (2006) ‘Constructivism and Sociological Institutionalism’, in M. Cini, and A.K. Bourne (eds), Palgrave Advances in European Union Studies (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan) 35–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woll, C. (2006) ‘The Road to External Representation: The European Commission’s Activism in International Air Transport’, Journal of European Public Policy 13(1): 52–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2010 Neill Nugent and William E. Paterson

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nugent, N., Paterson, W.E. (2010). The European Union’s Institutions. In: Egan, M., Nugent, N., Paterson, W.E. (eds) Research Agendas in EU Studies. Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230279445_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics