Abstract
The Camisea Natural Gas Project, Peru’s largest energy development project, sparked national hopes and expectations with its promise of economic development and a path toward energy independence. The Project was expected to boost Peru’s GDP by nearly a percentage point, and lead to the commercialization of secondary gas products, generating conditions favourable to developing a national petrochemical industry. But the US$1.6 billion Project to exploit Peru’s largest gas reserve — 13 trillion cubic feet — carried with it significant potential for damaging impacts. The Project threatened vulnerable communities and ecosystems from the lower Urubamba River valley in the upper Amazon basin, a region of extraordinary biodiversity and home to several indigenous peoples, through the Andes, to the Peruvian coast and the buffer zone of the Paracas National Reserve, Peru’s only protected marine area. Finally, the fact that Camisea was intended as the project that would open the Peruvian Amazon to a new era of oil and gas development meant that this Project would set precedents for the management of future projects. Concerns about these issues motivated a broad civil society coalition within Peru and internationally to seek to influence the Project’s management by advocating for the resolution of key problems before it could receive financing from the US Export-Import Bank (Ex-Im Bank) and the Inter-American Development Bank (IDB).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
F. Dallmeier and A. Alonso (1997) Biodiversity Assessment and Long-Term Monitoring, Lower Urubamba Region, Peru (Washington DC: Smithsonian Institution), pp. iii–iv.
For more on Shell’s experience in Camisea in the 1990s, see P. May et al. (1999) Corporate Roles and Rewards in Promoting Sustainable Development: Lessons Learned from Camisea, (Berkeley: Energy and Resources Group, University of California).
P. Caffrey (2002) ‘An independent Environmental and Social Assessment of the Camisea Gas Project’, Available at http://www.bicusa.org/en/Project. Resources.5.aspx. Accessed in November 2008.
J. Maughan (2003) Camisea Natural Gas Project Environmental Evaluation (Washington DC: Global Village Engineers).
Apoyo Consultoria (2007) Proyecto Camisea: El impacto sobre el mercado de gas natural y estimación de los beneficios económicos. Documento elaborado para el Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo, pp. 7, 65–6. Available at http://idbdocs.IDB.org, date accessed 30 November 2008.
M. Keck and K. Sikkink (1998) Activists Beyond Borders (Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press) pp. 22–5.
Copyright information
© 2009 Catherine Ross
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ross, C. (2009). Case Study: Natural Gas Project in Peru. In: Globalizing Social Justice. International Political Economy Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230277939_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230277939_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-30664-0
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-27793-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)