Skip to main content

China’s Catch-up and Innovation Model: A Case of the IT industry

  • Chapter
The Rise of Technological Power in the South

Abstract

In the decades during which the topic of catching up has received attention, two approaches and explanations have emerged that explain the catch-up process in the world. One approach is based on growth accounting. Using patents as an index for innovation capability, it has been used to find the key factors that determine catching-up processes in developing or newly developed countries. Furman and Hayes (2004) try to analyse this question in a qualitative way. Based on the growth model of Romer (1990), the theory of national competitive advantage (Porter, 1990) and national innovation systems (Nelson, 1993), they build a new framework and find that the factors behind catching up or standing still are the development of innovation-enhancing policies and infrastructure and the ever-increasing financial and human capital investment in innovation. However, their approach cannot explain country-specific factors in catching up. How can those factors work together to achieve the fast catch-up which has been achieved by some countries such as China?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Archibugi, D. and C. Pietrobelli (2003), ‘The globalization of technology and its implication for developing countries: Windows of oppurtunity or further burden’, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 70, 861–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, M. and K.L.R. Pavitt (1993), ‘Technological accumulation and industrial growth: Contrasts between developed and developing countries’, Industrial and Corporate Change, 2, 157–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cesaroni, F. (2004). ‘Technological outsourcing and product diversification: Do markets for technology affect firm’s strategies?’ Research Policy, 33, 1547–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, D. and L. Liu (2003), The Truth of Huawei (in Chinese). Beijing: Modern China Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H.W. (2003), Open Innovation, the New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagerberg, J. (1988), ‘Why growth rates differ’, in G. Dosi, C. Freeman, R. Nelson et al., Technical Change and Economic Theory. London: Pinter, 432–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, C. (1987), Technology Policy and Economic Performance. London: Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, C. (1988), ‘Japan: A new national system of innovation?’ in G. Dosi, C. Freeman, R. Nelson et al. (eds) Technical Change and Economic Theory. London: Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furman, J.L. and R. Hayes (2004), ‘Catching up or standing still? National innovative productivity among “follower countries”, 1978–1999’, Research Policy, 33, 1329–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao, S. (2004), ‘FDI and the technological progress in Chinese telecommunication equipment industry’, in Xaiozhuan Jiang (ed.) The Restructuring of S&T Resources and Chinese Industrial Technological Competence in the Process of Globalization. Beijing: Chinese Press of Social Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerschenkron, A. (1962), Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gold, A. R., G. Leibowitz and A. Perkins (2001), ‘A computer Lenovo in the making’, The McKinsey Quarterly, 3, 73–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobday, M. (1995), Innovation in East Asia: The Challenge to Japan. Brookfield, VT: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • IMD (2004), World Competitiveness Yearbook. Lausanne: IMD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, L. (1997), Imitation to Innovation. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kondo, R. and C. Watanabe (2003), ‘The virtuous cycle between institutional elasticity, IT advancement and sustainable growth: Can Japan survive in an information society?’ Technology in Society, 25, 319–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Keun and C. Lim (2001), ‘Technological regimes, catching up and leapfrogging: Findings from the Korean industries’, Research Policy, 30, 459–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Xielin (2006), ‘Dynamic innovation system of China’, Background paper for OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Xeilin (2008), ‘Globalization, catch-up and innovation (in Chinese). Beijing: Science Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Xielin and S. White (2001), ‘Comparing innovation systems: A framework and application to China’s transition context, Research Policy, 30, 1091–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, Feng and Feng Kaidong (2004), ‘Policy for developing domestic autonomous proprietary automobile industry’, Working Report of Ministry of Science and Technology (In Chinese). February.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mu, Q. and K. Lee, (2005), ‘Knowledge diffusion, market segmentation and technological catching-up: The case of the telecommunication industry in China’, Research Policy, 34, 759–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Bureau of Statistics (2006), China Yearbook of Statistics. Beijing: China Press of Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R.R., ed. (1993), National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perez, C. and L. Soete (1988), ‘Catching up in technology: Entry barriers and windows of opportunity’, in G. Dosi, C. Freeman, R. Nelson et al. (ed.) Technical Change and Economic Theory. London: Pinter, 458–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pisano, G. (1990), ‘The R&D boundaries of the firm: An empirical analysis’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 153–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M.E. (1990), The Competitive Advantage of Nation. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romer, P. (1990), ‘Endogenous technological change’, Journal of Political Economy, 98, 71–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veugelers, R. and B. Cassiman (1999), ‘Make and buy in innovation strategies: Evidence from Belgian manufacturing firms’, Research Policy, 28, 63–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (1993), The East Asian Miracle: Economic Growth and Public Policy. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xie, W. and S. White (2005), ‘Capability building in Lenovo: Strategic choice and path dependency’, working paper.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2010 Xielin Liu

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Liu, X. (2010). China’s Catch-up and Innovation Model: A Case of the IT industry. In: Fu, X., Soete, L. (eds) The Rise of Technological Power in the South. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230276123_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics