Skip to main content

Abstract

Foreign language learning in primary and secondary schools shares common characteristics worldwide. It takes place in the formal context of a classroom, it follows a syllabus, learners accomplish tasks in order to achieve learning objectives and receive marks on the basis of their scores on language tests.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ágreda, M. (2006) Motivation in English as a Compulsory Subject at the End of Primary and Secondary School. Unpublished Master Thesis. University of La Rioja, Department of English Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agustín Llach, M. P. and Terrazas Gallego, M. (2008) ‘Gender Differences in Receptive Vocabulary Size in EFL Primary School Learners: A Longitudinal Study’, Paper presented at AEDEAN Annual Conference held at Universitat de les Illes Balears.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agustín, M. P., Moreno, S. and Fernandez, A. (2005) ‘Responding to different composition topics: A quantitative analysis of lexical error production’, Glosas didácticas: revista electrónica international de didáctica de las lenguasysus culturas, 13, 128–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnaud, P. J. L. (1992) ‘Objective lexical and grammatical characteristics of L2 written compositions and the validity of separate-component tests’, in Vocabulary and Applied Linguistics. Arnaud, P. J. L. and Bejoint, H. (eds) London: Mcmillan, 133–145.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bacon, S. (1992) ‘The relationship between gender, comprehension, processing strategies and cognitive and affective response in second language listening’, The Modern Language Journal, 76, 160–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, J. P. (1987) ‘Sex differences in listening vocabulary’, Language Learning, 37, 273–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brantmeier, C. (2003) ‘Does gender make a difference? Passage content and comprehension in second language reading’, Reading in a Foreign Language, 15, 1, 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bygate, M. (1999) ‘Tasks as context for the framing, reframing and unframing of language’, System, 27, 33–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bygate, M., Skehan, P. and Swain, M. (2001) Researching Pedagogic Tasks, Second Language Learning and Testing. Harlow: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, L. (2002) ‘Measuring vocabulary size in English as an additional language’, Language Teaching Research, 6, 2, 145–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carcedo, A. (1998) ‘Tradición y novedad en las aportaciones hispanicas a los estudios de disponibilidad lexica’, Lingüística, 10, 5–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chavez, M. (2000) Gender in the Language Classroom. Boston: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chavez, M. (1996) ‘Non-revised writing, revised writing, and error detection by learner characteristics’. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 6, 2, 3–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich, S. (1997) ‘Gender as social practice: Implications for second language acquisition’, SSLA, 19, 121–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrman, M. and Oxford, R. (1989) ‘Effects of sex differences, career choice, and psychological type on adult language learning strategies’, The Modern Language Journal, 73, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Germany, P. and Cartes, N. (2000) ‘Léxico disponible en inglés como segunda lengua en instruction personalizada’, Estudios Pedagogicos, 26, 39–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faerch, C., Haastrup, K. and Phillipson, R. (1984) Learner Language and Language Learning. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, 14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fan, M. (2000) ‘How big is the gap and how to narrow it? An investigation into the active and passive vocabulary knowledge of L2 learners’, RELC Journal, 31, 2, 105–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S. (1997) Effective Language Learning. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellekant, J. (1994) ‘Are multiple-choice tests unfair to girls?’, System, 22, 349–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, J. and Meyerhoff, M. (2003) ‘Different voices, different views: An introduction to current research in language and gender’, The Handbook of Language and Gender. London: Blackwell Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, H. L., Zingraf, D. R.,Wormuth, S. A., Hartfiel, V. F. and Hughey, J. B. (1981) Testing ESL Composition: A Practical Approach. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiménez Catalán, R. M. and Ojeda Alba, J. (2010) ‘Girls’ and boys’ lexical availability in EFL’, ITL International Applied Linguistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiménez Catalán, R. M. and Terrazas, M. (2009) ‘The receptive vocabulary of English foreign language young learners: Data from Spanish primary schools’, Journal of English Studies, 5, 171–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiménez Catalán, R. M. and Ojeda Alba, J. (2008) ‘The English vocabulary of girls and boys: Similarities or differences? Evidence from a quantitative study’, in Gender and Language Research Methodologies. Harrington, K., Litosseleti, L., Sauntson, H. and Sunderland, J. (eds) London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiménez Catalán, R. M. and Moreno Espinosa, S. (2005) ‘Promoting vocabulary research in primary and secondary education: Test review and test selection criteria’, ES Review, 25 (2003–2005), 171–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiménez Catalán, R. M. (2003) ‘Sex differences in L2 vocabulary learning strategies’, International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 13, 1, 54–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiménez Catalán, R. M. (2002) ‘La representation del factor sexo/genero en manuales y revistas en la lingmstica aplicada’, in Genero, Sexo, Discurso. A. Vigara Tauste and R. M. Jiménez Catalán (eds) Madrid: Editorial El Laberinto. Coleccion Hermes, 229–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiménez Catalán, R. M. (1992) Errores en la producción escrita del inglés y posi- bles factores condicionantes. Madrid: Editorial de la Universidad Complutense. Coleccion Tesis Doctorales, 73/92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koda, K. (1993) ‘Task-induced variability in FL composition: Language-specific perspectives’, Foreign Language Annals, 26, 3, 332–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laufer, B. and Nation, I. S. P. (1995) ‘Vocabulary size and use: Lexical richness in L2 written production’, Applied Linguistics, 16, 307–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laufer, B. (1998) ‘The development of passive and active vocabulary in a second language: Same or different?’, Applied Linguistics, 19, 255–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laufer, B. and Paribakht, S. (1998) ‘The relationship between passive and active vocabularies: Effects of language learning context’, Language Learning, 48, 3, 365–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linnarud, M. (1986) Lexis in Composition: A Performance Analysis of Swedish Learner’s Written English. Malmö, Sweden: Liber Förlag Malmö.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lumley, T. and O’Sullivan, B. (2005) ‘The impact of test taker characteristics on speaking test task performance’, Language Testing, 22, 4, 415–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, L. (1998) ‘Differences in men’s and women’s ESL writing at the junior college level: Consequences for research on feedback’, The Canadian Modern Language Review, 55, 2, 219–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nation, I. S. P. (1983) ‘Testing and teaching vocabulary’, Guidelines, 5, 12–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nation, I. S. P. (1990) Teaching and Learning Vocabulary. New York: Heinle and Heinle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nation, I. S. P. (2001) Learning Vocabulary in Another Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Norton, B. and Pavlenko, A. (2004) Gender and English Language Learners. Alexandria, VA: TESOL Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ojeda, J. and Jiménez Catalán, R. M. (2007) ‘The worlds children’s words build’, Didáctica (Lengua y Literatura), 19, 155–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxford, R. and Niykos, M. (1989) ‘Variables affecting choice of language learning strategies by university students’, Modern Language Journal, 73, 291–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pavlenko, A. (2001) ‘Bilingualism, gender, and ideology’, The International Journal of Bilingualism, 5, 2, 117–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Read, J. (2000) Assessing Vocabulary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, N., Schmitt, D. and Clapham, C. (2001) ‘Developing and exploring the behaviour of two new versions of the vocabulary levels test’, Language Testing, 18, 1, 55–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, M. (1996) Word Smith Tools. Version 2. 0. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shohamy, E. (1984) ‘Does the testing method make a difference? The case of reading comprehension’, Language Testing, 1, 147–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shohamy, E. (1997) ‘Testing methods, testing consequences: Are they ethical? are they fair?’, Language Testing, 14, 3, 340–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sunderland, J. (2000) ‘Issues of language and gender in second and foreign language education’, Language Teaching: The International Abstracting Journal for Language Teachers, Educators and Researchers. Special feature, 203–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waring, R. (1997) ‘A comparison of the receptive and productive sizes of second language learners’, Immaculata (Notre Dame Seishin University, Okayama) 1, 53–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, D. (1993) ‘A comparison of assessment tasks used to measure FL reading comprehension’, The Modern Language Journal, 77, iv, 473–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2010 Rosa María Jiménez Catalán

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Catalán, R.M.J. (2010). Gender Tendencies in EFL across Vocabulary Tests. In: Catalán, R.M.J. (eds) Gender Perspectives on Vocabulary in Foreign and Second Languages. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230274938_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics